4
4elise
Guest
I read the articles you posted and of course the young woman who had her fashion design pulled from the runway must be disappointed, the institute should have had clear direction on what would and would not be allowed much earlier.PETA scores a victory by scaring organisers out of allowing garments made from rabbit fur to be displayed. In Australia, where rabbits are a multi-billion dollar pest.
Oh, the power these crazies have! Given into by moral cowards.
These animal welfare groups are fast losing any credibility they still might have.
The promotion of rabbit hunting and rabbit eating and utilising rabbit fur should be on the agenda of any sane organisation that cares about the environment.
Equally important is ensuring that the rabbits do not impact the work of farmers - your second source noted that warren destruction is the favored method.
The ‘crazies’ who protest fur do so not only to protect the rabbits, which are apparently a huge problem for farmers in Australia, but for the production of fur and any hide product. (interesting to see that the rabbits were an introduction to the environment) To prepare fur and hides it is necessary to use chemicals which are not environmentally sustainable, cause damage to air and the water tables, etc - this young woman’s little corner of the world, and her small production may be just a drop in the bucket - but it is the issue of larger scale awareness of this issue that causes the ‘crazies’ to work to make a point at every opportunity.
There are many things that are environmentally damaging - synthetic products that use petrol - so always a balancing act, trying to make the best choices. Working to make the point that wearing dead animals for ‘fashion’ is certainly on the agenda of many groups - for some it is just the thought of a dead animal - for others it is the issue of the environmental damage.