A compelling non-Catholic argument

  • Thread starter Thread starter OnlyAmbrose
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
I’d like to see a scripture that says that. I don’t believe that you can provide one.Really? The New Testament says different.

Matthew 28:18 And Jesus coming, spoke to them, saying: All power is given to me in heaven and in earth. 19 Going therefore, teach ye all nations; baptizing them in the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Ghost. 20 Teaching them to observe all things whatsoever I have commanded you: and behold I am with you all days, even to the consummation of the world.Among other things, but you cannot provide a scripture that says that is all it is.Really? I defy you to provide scripture that supports that interpretation. You won’t find it because it’s not there.
The bible is the Word of God. The word of God is Christ. Who must you have faith in to gain salvation?

There are teachers within the Church, but the Church itself is not a teaching institution. Is it not evident that not all are apostles and not all are teachers.

Ephrsians 2:11-22
**One in Christ **
11Therefore, remember that formerly you who are Gentiles by birth and called “uncircumcised” by those who call themselves “the circumcision” (that done in the body by the hands of men)— 12remember that at that time you were separate from Christ, excluded from citizenship in Israel and foreigners to the covenants of the promise, without hope and without God in the world. 13But now in Christ Jesus you who once were far away have been brought near through the blood of Christ.
14For he himself is our peace, who has made the two one and has destroyed the barrier, the dividing wall of hostility, 15by abolishing in his flesh the law with its commandments and regulations. His purpose was to create in himself one new man out of the two, thus making peace, 16and in this one body to reconcile both of them to God through the cross, by which he put to death their hostility. 17He came and preached peace to you who were far away and peace to those who were near. 18For through him we both have access to the Father by one Spirit.

19Consequently, you are no longer foreigners and aliens, but fellow citizens with God’s people and members of God’s household, 20built on the foundation of the apostles and prophets, with Christ Jesus himself as the chief cornerstone. 21In him the whole building is joined together and rises to become a holy temple in the Lord. 22And in him you too are being built together to become a dwelling in which God lives by his Spirit.
 
You would have to abandon your personal opinions - and you’ll have to do that before you die, anyway, in order to get to Heaven, so why not get in a little practice here and now? 😉

In the same way that when you put your key in the car, you have to follow the rules of the road, instead of driving on the sidewalks or ignoring the signs and signals - the rules are there to keep us safe on our journey to Heaven. And just as having a car and following the rules of the road leads to freedom, so does having rules in the Church - especially since it is God, who knows what we need better than anybody, who gave us those rules in the first place. 🙂
This is my point. My beliefs are based on my own examination of scripture. I would not throw away that which was given to me by the HS to adopt another doctrine. If Christ is in me and I live by the Spirit, I see no other requirements for my salvation.

Also thanks for the clarifiacation about the 73/46 books.
 
You’d have to abandon falsehood, yes. As well as the sin of pride which leads you to believe your belief or disbelief is somehow the supreme consideration of the Church.

The Church is not Ikea. She cares for the Truth, not what you choose to buy or not buy.
You assume that I believe that all my opinions are absolute. Understand that I am fallible. I am strong in my faith. I am only proud of the things that God has done through me. For I have done nothing of myself that is of any worth. I never made a claim that it was supreme. I stated that I have the same(or equall) authority to interprete scripture.
 
The bible is the Word of God. The word of God is Christ.
The Bible is not Christ, though. The Bible is one of many products of the Holy Tradition that was given to the Apostles by Christ, and passed down by them through their successors (the Bishops) to us.
 
This is my point. My beliefs are based on my own examination of scripture.
And you are more likely to be right than thousands of theologians and mystics from all over the world, working together for 2,000 years, who have all come to the same conclusions as the Catholic Church?
I would not throw away that which was given to me by the HS to adopt another doctrine. If Christ is in me and I live by the Spirit, I see no other requirements for my salvation.
“If” - yes. What if you are not, in fact, being led by the Holy Spirit, but only by your own personal opinions? What if you are leaning on your own understanding? (Proverbs 3)
 
Unfortunately, it is more complicated than this. The Apostles defined with clarity what one must believe in order to be considered a “Christian”. All the denominations that have been spawned since the Reformation have rejected a little or a lot of these criteria.
Yet I do not require your aproval, nor the aproval of the Catholic church. I AM a christian, and only God can Judge the truth of my claim.
But unity is the fruit of adherance to Truth, and there will never be unity until there is adnerance to the Truth. Since, for most, “truth” is based on one’s perceptions, so long as there are so many different perceptions we will be separated from one another.
No. Unity comes from seeking a common goal, despite other differences. Our unity is in Christ.
We do, and we recognize that God has entered into human history, and that the HS works through people, who exist in time, and within an historical context.
So you think that the HS can not stand on its own, without the words or writtings of men?
I think it would be more accurate to say that some of God’s revelation is found in the Scripture, some in the Church, and some in the believer. Humanity is quite unable to contain the whole revelation of God.
What does 1 Corinthians 2 say about the Truth?
ALL revelation comes from the HS.
Weed them out by using which standard?
The bible has many ways to root out false prophets. Fruits of the Spirit is one. It also is clear that in order to know a man as a false prophet, one must be living in the Spirit himself.
 
You assume that I believe that all my opinions are absolute. Understand that I am fallible.
Why is this supposed to be a good thing? :confused:

If you can be wrong and change your mind, then aren’t you building your house on shifting sand?

Instead, you should build your house on the Rock of Peter!! 🙂
 
The on-line Catholic bible
drbo.org/
Hi Protestant Man, This is just a side note:

If you have never read the Deutercanonical Books they are really interesting and fill in a lot of holes.

Anyway as a kid I always wondered about the Jewish celebration of Hanukkah-- The Jews are a people of the Book- They celebrate this Festival of Lights, it is suppose to be a great miracle- So why isn’t it mentioned in the Old Testament?

Well surprise it is. It is in the First Book of Maccabees 🙂
 
No I have not. I do not even know where to get a hold of these books.
They are in the back of most Protestant Bibles under the name of “The Apocrypha.”
This is my point. My beliefs are based on my own examination of scripture. I would not throw away that which was given to me by the HS to adopt another doctrine.
You assume that I believe that all my opinions are absolute. Understand that I am fallible.
Do you not see how you contradict yourself here? On the one hand, you say that your reading of scripture comes directly from the Holy Spirit. On the other, you say you’re fallible. So which is it? Your reading of scripture is from the Holy Spirit and is infallible, or your reading of scripture is your own and is fallible?
 
This is my point. My beliefs are based on my own examination of scripture. I would not throw away that which was given to me by the HS to adopt another doctrine. If Christ is in me and I live by the Spirit, I see no other requirements for my salvation.

Also thanks for the clarifiacation about the 73/46 books.
I very much admire your commitment to the study of God’s Word. Something many Catholics can not claim to have done. That being said, you know very well that their is no absolute assurance that your, or anyone else’s in protestantism, interpretation of the Word is* the* true one. No one in protestantism claims infallible interpreting abilities, therefore you can in no way be totally, without a doubt, sure that your interpretation is more right than protestant A or Z.

The Catholic Church IS Christ’s Church and He promised to be with it and guide it into all truth. Not some truth, or a pretty good guess about the truth, but the whole, honest, and only truth. The scriptures command us to stay away from those who teach doctrine contrary to what Christ and the apostles taught and the only Churches that can contend to hold the beliefs that can be traced back to the time of the early church are the Catholic and Orthodox Churches.

The Catholic Church is the fullness of Christianity, meaning that other churches may hold part of it. But if you know there has to be a Church around with the fullness of the faith, with assurance of the truth, then you must seek it out. And there IS a Church around with that fullness, since Christ Himself promised that nothing would defeat it.

Be prayin for ya man…as I am sure you are praying for us.
 
1 Corinthians 2:6-16
Wisdom From the Spirit **
6We do, however, speak a message of wisdom among the mature, but not the wisdom of this age or of the rulers of this age, who are coming to nothing. 7No, we speak of God’s secret wisdom, a wisdom that has been hidden and that God destined for our glory before time began. 8None of the rulers of this age understood it, for if they had, they would not have crucified the Lord of glory. 9However, as it is written:
“No eye has seen,
no ear has heard,
no mind has conceived
what God has prepared for those who love him”
— 10but God has revealed it to us by his Spirit**.
The Spirit searches all things, even the deep things of God. 11For who among men knows the thoughts of a man except the man’s spirit within him? In the same way no one knows the thoughts of God except the Spirit of God. 12We have not received the spirit of the world but the Spirit who is from God, that we may understand what God has freely given us. 13This is what we speak, not in words taught us by human wisdom but in words taught by the Spirit, expressing spiritual truths in spiritual words.[c] 14The man without the Spirit does not accept the things that come from the Spirit of God, for they are foolishness to him, and he cannot understand them, because they are spiritually discerned. 15The spiritual man makes judgments about all things, but he himself is not subject to any man’s judgment:
16"For who has known the mind of the Lord
that he may instruct him?"[d] But we have the mind of Christ.
It is relevant that you have not included 1-5.

When I came to you, brothers, proclaiming the mystery of God, I did not come with sublimity of words or of wisdom. For I resolved to know nothing while I was with you except Jesus Christ, and him crucified. I came to you in weakness and fear and much trembling, and my message and my proclamation were not with persuasive (words of) wisdom, but with a demonstration of spirit and power, so that your faith might rest not on human wisdom but on the power of God.

As you reflect on this section, I ask you to pray for discernment on who is “we” in the text that you provided. Might it be Paul speaking on behalf of the Church to tell them that their views are in error so they are to listen to him as he speaks with authority? Might he be saying that the “we” doesn’t include you and I but the Church for whom he speaks? It has profound implications on the meaning of what you reference.
 
They are in the back of most Protestant Bibles under the name of “The Apocrypha.”
Actually they aren’t. I was a Protestant(Fundamentalist/Evangelical) for over 20 years and had several different versions and they weren’t in a one of them. The Only exception was one my Mom had from Her Anglican Church (I can’t remember what version it was) and it had them in the back.
 
Actually they aren’t. I was a Protestant(Fundamentalist/Evangelical) for over 20 years and had several different versions and they weren’t in a one of them. The Only exception was one my Mom had from Her Anglican Church (I can’t remember what version it was) and it had them in the back.
Ah, thanks for that. I am most familiar with the Episcopal Church and our bibles had them.
 
The Church is anyone who believes in the Bible. The church is not a teaching institution, it is a fellowship of believers. The Bible is the source for teaching.
This is unbiblical. The Church are those who believe in Jesus and DO as He commands and instructs. Catholics worship God in His Three Persons. We do not worship the Bible.

James
 
By virtue of your Baptism, you should wear this proudly.
I do, but only by the grace of God.
Do you not think that maybe the Scripture that Church Militant pasted regarding “contention” shows that Christ (and the Early Church) knew this was going to be a problem and thus exerted authority? Why do you think Christ would believe that “contention” and “disunity” would be ok in the future? Why do you doubt that Christ wouldn’t provide a protection from contention and disunity by ordaining a temporal authority which His flock could look to with confidence and assurance?
I have never disagreed with authority in the church. I do however believe that the Catholic Church has used their authority in a way that caused dissunity.
I don’t say this to be harsh or uncharitable but ask yourself “May this also apply to me?”
Absolutely. I dig into the scriptures to draw closer to God. If I continue to seek hi and the HS, I am guarded from falling into this trap of Satan. I am but a child in my faith, but there is definate evidence in my life, that the HS is preparing me for solid food. I judge myself harsher than anyone. I feel that I have recieved a gift that I do not deserve. I find it hard to believe that Christ willingly sacrificed himself so that I might recieve that gift. I never proclaim my good deeds to be of my own doing, but rather the action of the HS living in me.
Disagreement is not the work of Christ but Satan.
Agreed, and this is exactly what I was refering to. Outside the basis of Christ, is Satans playground.
Structure is not an issue in the Catholic Church and not dependent on what the current Pastor sets up.
Well of course. It was set up many years ago. Why would the pastor need to set up something that already exists. But in Protestant churches, it has not always been established.
There is a way. Come Home!
If only I were freely welcomed. As I have adressed that I am not in another post.😦
First of all, this question must be rhetorical because even yourself have said that believers are part of Christ.
Yes but not before creation. And we are part of the Body of Christ in which Christ himself is the Head. We are not actually Christ.
When Christ created the Priesthood at the Last Supper He mysteriously and mystically joined Himself to the Priesthood. When the Holy Spirit descended on the Apostles at Pentecost, the Church was mysteriously and mystically joined to Christ. When the Holy Spirit inspired the authors of Scripture and to the Church, Holy Scripture, Holy Tradition, and Holy Teaching was mysteriously and mystically joined to Christ. And, when we are baptized, we are mysteriously and mystically joined to Christ.
Not mystically joined. That is an improper way to word it. Christ established the Church upon himself. The church is built on the foundation of Christ. It is not as though the foundation is somehow mystically intertwined with the rest of the building.
What is illuminating is that Christ promised to the Church that the Gates of Hell would not prevail against us meaning that union with Him and His Church would never be broken. But He made no such promise to us. Many times Scripture tells us that we must preserve, be diligent, etc. lest we will be lost. Our union requires our cooperation.
Our cooperation requires the HS. Your interpretation of the meaning of “Gates of Hell” are just that, an interpretation. It does not say that the church is protected against the Hosts of Hell. I have thought of that phrase to be based on a final judgement. When will a sinner see the gates of Hell? He will see them upon the completion of his judgement. This is an example of where I think the church has made an interpretation based on what they want to believe. Notice, it also says nothing about infallibility teaching.
There is a way. Come Home! It is where you are called to be
On the day I am freely welcomed, I will.
 
I know I can find them online. Where can I get an actual bible with the deuterocanonal books in it?
Amazon.com

Try the RSV Catholic Ed.

RSV=Revised Standard Version

Actually you have to type the Long name Revised Standard Version Catholic Ed. in the search- it didn’t like just RSV 👍
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top