F
foolishmortal
Guest
The question I have is, what do I say about Communion? I don’t know if he can have Jesus or not anymore. I know, even if he says he has done something that would be seriously sinful, it still might not be a mortal sin in his case.
Also, if someone says something bad about the Virgin Mary, what is best to do? One of the other foreigners, where I’m at, snickered about the idea of her being a virgin. I could not think of the best way to counter it. Using sharp words like “sophmoric”, which seems to be the mind of many expats, including me (but in a conservative context in my case) might show a bad example to those who think any devout Christian is a reactionary-type. I’m never sure, because it could result in more saying of seriously sinful matter if the person is an angry person. What if there is an underlying thorn in his soul or intellect that will be driven in further by a scornful or even phlegmatic philosophical rebuke that shows some lack of understanding? Still, people might respect defending the Faith, subconsciously. I think they know I’m an orthodox Catholic.
Maybe I’m just a bookworm who’s really a wimp when the Faith is challenged, but I do feel a fight inside me between whether to rebuke or avoid the person putting their foot further in hell (even our indult traditional priest told us not to remind the likely too hard-hearted about their actions being seriously sinful as he/she would then definitely have full-knowledge). I am scrupulous and wonder if it’s even a bad idea to set someone straight who thinks with possible hidden anger or their sexuality. Does it really matter for them as it would for a concerned or interested confused Catholic or firebrand Evangelical?
What would G.K. Chesterton do?
Please do tell about this and/or the first question! Thank you!
Phil
BTW Should I bring up the argument about Mary’s virginity again as a misconception about the brother of Jesus hoax?
Also, if someone says something bad about the Virgin Mary, what is best to do? One of the other foreigners, where I’m at, snickered about the idea of her being a virgin. I could not think of the best way to counter it. Using sharp words like “sophmoric”, which seems to be the mind of many expats, including me (but in a conservative context in my case) might show a bad example to those who think any devout Christian is a reactionary-type. I’m never sure, because it could result in more saying of seriously sinful matter if the person is an angry person. What if there is an underlying thorn in his soul or intellect that will be driven in further by a scornful or even phlegmatic philosophical rebuke that shows some lack of understanding? Still, people might respect defending the Faith, subconsciously. I think they know I’m an orthodox Catholic.
Maybe I’m just a bookworm who’s really a wimp when the Faith is challenged, but I do feel a fight inside me between whether to rebuke or avoid the person putting their foot further in hell (even our indult traditional priest told us not to remind the likely too hard-hearted about their actions being seriously sinful as he/she would then definitely have full-knowledge). I am scrupulous and wonder if it’s even a bad idea to set someone straight who thinks with possible hidden anger or their sexuality. Does it really matter for them as it would for a concerned or interested confused Catholic or firebrand Evangelical?
What would G.K. Chesterton do?
Please do tell about this and/or the first question! Thank you!
Phil
BTW Should I bring up the argument about Mary’s virginity again as a misconception about the brother of Jesus hoax?
