F
Freddy
Guest
Trying to understand you…Freddy:
Good, good.
And do you know what you are trying to do?
Trying to understand you…Freddy:
Good, good.
And do you know what you are trying to do?
I don’t now why either, probably a computer glitch.I’m not sure why this lengthy post about bioethics was forwarded to me. My post was about BIBLICAL evidence in Revelation 13: 18 and Revelation 17: 8 that diploid cells (46 chromosome cells) contain the human soul.
I used to believe this. Now I think it will be a team of corporate researchers looking to enslave humanity for shareholders’ profits and leadership’s infinite power.Most likely it will be a team of scientists. PhD’s and MDs with well-funded research endowments and university administration.
Oh, yes, 100% agree.Not sure how the guilt for such collective sin will parse out. Something like creating nuclear weapons.
OK, that’s a goal (perhaps an intermediate goal).Trying to understand you…
Reading your posts might be a good idea.Freddy:
OK, that’s a goal (perhaps an intermediate goal).Trying to understand you…
So, do you have a plan to achieve that goal? Have you chosen some means to achieve it?
If one takes the cloning premise, and applies it to Revelation, there are a large number of “dots” in Revelation, which connect very well.That said, having a fundamentalist independent baptist background as a child, I respectfully disagree with your interpretation of scriptures(which reflect very similar interpretations of cloned humans or IVF humans by fundamentalists) about human clones.
Hopefully, that is not the only step in the plan, for that would only work if I would have written all you want to understand explicitly.Reading your posts might be a good idea.
I’m mildly insulted. I’m not sure how old you are, Mpat. Or how long your ‘plan’ has been running. But I’ve been around the block quite a few times and I’m not just starting out thinking ‘gee, I wonder what all this is about…’Freddy:
Hopefully, that is not the only step in the plan, for that would only work if I would have written all you want to understand explicitly.Reading your posts might be a good idea.
Anyway, you have a goal, you have at least a partial plan - now you can go, implement it, report back the results. Unless, of course, you are going to improve your plan first.
“Amen I say to you, unless you be converted, and become as little children, you shall not enter into the kingdom of heaven.” (Matthew 18:3)…I certainly don’t need you to help me form such a plan and then send me off to investigate under your guidance and report back like a kid with a school project.
And yet, you do not seem to be all that happy, nor do you seem to be someone who does not need instructions and guidance.I’ve reached where I need to be and I’m happy to be there. I am happy to listen to you about your journey and discuss the differences in approach but I definitely don’t need any guidance or instructions from you.
I finf the best way to learn something is to question everything.Freddy:
Actually, you also won’t learn anything, unless you will be willing to “become as little children” (humble, willing to find truth about something etc.).I certainly don’t need you to help me form such a plan and then send me off to investigate under your guidance and report back like a kid with a school project.
Does this “everything” include your own virtue, competence and the like?I finf the best way to learn something is to question everything.
That’s first off the block. As Feynman said: ‘The easiest person to fool is yourself’.Freddy:
Does this “everything” include your own virtue, competence and the like?I finf the best way to learn something is to question everything.
So, let’s look at things you wrote just before:That’s first off the block. As Feynman said: ‘The easiest person to fool is yourself’.
Always doubt yourself first and foremost.
Did you remember to doubt your ability to do without those “any guidance or instructions”? And if you did doubt, what defeated those doubts?I’ve reached where I need to be and I’m happy to be there. I am happy to listen to you about your journey and discuss the differences in approach but I definitely don’t need any guidance or instructions from you.
You’ve taken a different path. I can see you over there from over here. If you are confident in the direction you have taken and are happy where you are then you don’t need any instructions or guidance from me.Freddy:
So, let’s look at things you wrote just before:That’s first off the block. As Feynman said: ‘The easiest person to fool is yourself’.
Always doubt yourself first and foremost.
Did you remember to doubt your ability to do without those “any guidance or instructions”? And if you did doubt, what defeated those doubts?I’ve reached where I need to be and I’m happy to be there. I am happy to listen to you about your journey and discuss the differences in approach but I definitely don’t need any guidance or instructions from you.
I lose smarts with this technique. But I question anyway.I finf the best way to learn something is to question everything.
That is not a description of any technique to avoid self-deception, nor is it a description of technique to detect it.You’ve taken a different path. I can see you over there from over here. If you are confident in the direction you have taken and are happy where you are then you don’t need any instructions or guidance from me.
The reverse applies.
Why is that last sentence in quotes? Who said it?So, can you see any other reason to believe those things about yourself, other than “The alternative looks scary and humiliating.”?
Let’s try again with a tiny change.Why is that last sentence in quotes? Who said it?
That is not a description of any technique to avoid self-deception, nor is it a description of technique to detect it.You’ve taken a different path. I can see you over there from over here. If you are confident in the direction you have taken and are happy where you are then you don’t need any instructions or guidance from me.
The reverse applies.
Who said it’s ‘scary and humiliating’?Freddy:
Let’s try again with a tiny change.Why is that last sentence in quotes? Who said it?
That is not a description of any technique to avoid self-deception, nor is it a description of technique to detect it.You’ve taken a different path. I can see you over there from over here. If you are confident in the direction you have taken and are happy where you are then you don’t need any instructions or guidance from me.
The reverse applies.
And in the same text you cited, Feynman demands actual effort with real techniques to avoid self-deception, like proper experimental design.
So, can you see any other reason to believe those things about yourself, other than something mostly equivalent to “The alternative looks scary and humiliating.”?
Quotation marks are not just used for quoting something someone else said, but also for giving various propositions, when they are being discussed.Who said it’s ‘scary and humiliating’?
That is not a description of any technique to avoid self-deception, nor is it a description of technique to detect it.You’ve taken a different path. I can see you over there from over here. If you are confident in the direction you have taken and are happy where you are then you don’t need any instructions or guidance from me.
The reverse applies.
You being there and me being here is not a technique to determine self deception. To avoid deception you need to question your own views. To argue against them. You meed to take the opposite view. To actually listen to the views of others who think differently with an open mind.So, can you see any other reason to believe those things about yourself, other than something mostly equivalent to “The alternative looks scary and humiliating.”?