In an earlier post I remarked, “…P]erhaps my main concern is for the potential detrimental effects upon [the perception of] Christianity if an [unjustified or unwarranted], “it’s O.K. when Paul did/does it.” mentality is cultivated or endorsed; especially if/when the potential change in the perpetrator’s religious status is unknown or irrelevant.” I will clarify and elaborate upon these words/concepts.
During the revelation process I inherently underwent an assessment of the potential justification(s) for the authorization of the opportunity.
That is to say that, after being aware of the details of the revelation, [it was as though] I asked myself, “Why would God allow something like this to happen?”
I understand that this is a difficult question to answer and one for which there may be many varying and diverse opinions.
From my interpretation [at the time of revelation], the content of Galatians 4 is central to the allowance of the eventuality of the event(s) wherein the perpetrator’s life [and cognitive function] is preserved. For this, in turn, would allow for a

[Islamic] [written] non-violent rebuttal to any of the inappropriate and/or offensive content of , at least,] the aforementioned work.
For this, and other, reason(s) I would like to state/remind that I do not endorse, in part, or in full, Paul’s writings/teachings/etc.
However, I am not [necessarily] advocating a

automatic/necessary preeminence of any other work.
In closing, I would like to bring to remembrance the words of John the Baptist:
“And think not to say within yourselves, We have Abraham to our father: for I say unto you, that God is able of these stones to raise up children unto Abraham.”
– Matthew 3:9 KJV