A Protestant view of the Mother of God

  • Thread starter Thread starter Ite_ad_Ioseph
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
=RonTheNewJew;To PJM:
The same author (the apostle Paul) who wrote Philippians 2:12 also wrote Phil. 2:13. Paul also wrote: “For by grace you have been saved through faith, and that not of yourselves; it is the gift of God, not of works, lest anyone should boast.” Eph. 2:8-9. This is in line with what Jesus taught in Jh 15, that our connection must be to Himself and then we will bear fruit (works of loving service and obedience).
Shalom Ron,

I’m curious what brought you to Judism, and what’s you’re goal being on CAF?

Ron, please tolerate my edits of you’re excellent post, but as you know we are limited to space.

In reading all of Eph.,and Rom. as well, it is evident that “works” in many cases refer to “works of the OLD Torah” law, and at times [good] works of the New Covenant. Eph.2:10
"0 For we are his workmanship, **created in Christ Jesus for good works, **which God prepared beforehand, that we should walk in them.

So one must read the entire meaasge to gain wisdom and understanding.
The Bible teaches a unified message. Paul did not contradict Jesus Christ, nor did Paul teach one thing in one verse and the opposite in another verse. It is very clear from Scripture that our good works are the evidence that we have received Christ’s gift of salvation. The robe of Christ’s righteousness that justifies us also works in us through the power of the Holy Spirit to produce fruitful obedience (good works). “For we are His workmanship, created in Christ Jesus for good works, which God prepared beforehand that we should walk in them.” Ephesians 2:10. Paul never supported willful disobedience. We are to choose to receive Christ’s righteousness and choose to be obedient to His will, His commandments as explained in the Moral Law. God looks for fruit in our lives as the evidence that salvation is effective in our lives. It is by the fruit (our obedient works) that we are judged.
Amen! Pat {"I believe!}
So what does Philippians 2:12 mean? Here is the entire verse: “Therefore, my beloved, as you have always obeyed, not as in my presence only, but now much more in my absence, work out your own salvation with fear and trembling.” The first thing we notice is that Paul is writing to converted believers who are obedient. He says they have always obeyed. Always? Clearly “always” began with the time they were converted and were first instructed. The phrase “work out” is from the Greek word katergazomai and means “to carry out to completion.” Paul is exhorting the Philippians to continue to live an obedient, Christian life. This verse is not to be seen as teaching the opposite of the next verse: “For it is God who works in you both to will and to do for His good pleasure.” (Phil. 2:13). In verse 13 Paul explains how it is possible to be obedient, as he has instructed in verse 12.
Ron, I’m confused. I agree with what this states, what is the point of difference you’d like to address?
Referring to Matthew 25 and the two groups at the Second Coming of Christ: Again, it is the fruit that God looks for - the obedient good works that are the evidence that salvation has been effective in the life. Jesus taught this same teaching in Matthew 7:21-23: “Not everyone who says to Me, ‘Lord, Lord,’ shall enter the kingdom of heaven, but he who does the will of My father in heaven. Many will say to Me in that day, ‘Lord, Lord, have we not prophesied in Your name, cast out demons in Your name, and done many wonders in Your name?’ And then I will declare to them, 'I never knew you; depart from Me, you who practice lawlessness!” [are law breakers]
Here people are denied entrance into the Kingdom, even though they have done good works: they have prophesied, cast out demons and done many wonders. But they have not obeyed God’s law. There are people who do good works - they look good on the outside - but they disobey the plain teachings of Scripture.
Now I think I get what you’re saying, and again we agree.

Works by themselves, will not assure one access to heaven. The Catholic Church teaches that we “CANNOT” earn by ourselves, in any way, shape or form, access to heaven.

Salvation is a Gift from God, as is GRACE. BUT they are “gifts with strings attached.”

We must be Baptised [Jn.3:5] we must obey all of the Commandments [Mt.19:16] we must confess our sins [Jn.20:23-24, Mt.16;18-20, Mt.18:18] and we must be charitable.

It is no sigle “thing” or group of “things” that assure heaven, for heaven too is a Gift from God, who however does factor in and make conditional what these verses require, as is His Divine right.
So do we obey God? Take a look at the Moral Law in Exodus 20, 21, 22, and 23. It starts with the Ten Commandments and continues on to the statutes and judgments. By these commandments we will be judged…
Remember, it was the pre-incarnate Christ who spoke the Moral law to the people and to Moses. These precepts lay out God’s law of love - they teach us what it means to love God with all our heart, mind and soul, and our neighbor as ourselves. These are as much Christ’s commandments as anything recorded in the Gospels. It seems we have plenty to work on to be obedient to Scripture without adding traditions that oppose Scripture.
Ron, help me out here. Which Traditions are you speaking of?
Jesus said, “I am the way, the truth and the life. NO ONE COMES TO THE FATHER EXCEPT THROUGH ME.” (John 14:6). Jesus HAS a way, a truth and a life - we must always be obedient, through the power of the Holy Spirit, to Jesus’ way, truth and life. Jesus’ way, truth and life are laid out in Scripture.
Shalom in Yeshua!
Ron my friend in Christ,

What is you’re understanding of Christ? Who and what is He in you’re understanding?

We are not too far apart at this juncture.

Shalom my friend,
Pat
 
To: PJM

I identify myself as a Messianic Jew with a Protestant background. As I have traveled the path of faith my goal has been to come closer in practice to the religion of the Bible. Moving on has not so much involved “dumping” one religion for another; it has rather involved leaving errors behind while embracing truth more in line with Scripture. As the saying goes, “We don’t know what we don’t know, until we know it!”

In Messianic Judaism I find a religion that is close to the practice and beliefs of the apostles as described in the New Testament. I believe it was the pre-incarnate Christ who spoke to Moses. Yahweh/Jehovah of the Old Testament is the one who humbled Himself in the incarnation to take on human flesh and walk among men. Yahweh/Jehovah of the Old Testament is Yeshua/Jesus of the New Testament. Thus, Mosaic Judaism was established by Christ. Messianic Mosaic Judaism was further unfolded by the Messiah, Jesus Christ. While Jesus in His day criticized and even denounced those man-made traditions that were opposed to Scripture, He showed the true Messianic meaning of those things given to Moses. Paul elaborates on this in Hebrew 7-10 and shows the true Antitypes that the types pointed to. We now look to Jesus our heavenly High Priest as He ministers in the heavenly sanctuary, pleading His bood shed once to bear the sins of many, interceding on our behalf before the Mercy Seat of the throne of God.

John 1:1-3 clearly says that Jesus is one with God from the beginning. Jesus is the Creator. He came to be our only Redeemer, our only Mediator, and He ordained that the Holy Spirit is to be His only Dispensor of grace to humanity. I believe this is what Scripture teaches.

Much more could be said. I have already said much on this blog!

My brother in Christ, I do want to wish you Shabbat Shalom, and a blessed New Covenant Pentecost. May the Holy Spirit lead us into all truth - truth revealed by the Holy Spirit through Scripture.

Shalom in Yeshua
 
=RonTheNewJew;5261073]To: PJM
I identify myself as a Messianic Jew with a Protestant background. As I have traveled the path of faith my goal has been to come closer in practice to the religion of the Bible. Moving on has not so much involved “dumping” one religion for another; it has rather involved leaving errors behind while embracing truth more in line with Scripture. As the saying goes, “We don’t know what we don’t know, until we know it!”
In Messianic Judaism I find a religion that is close to the practice and beliefs of the apostles as described in the New Testament. I believe it was the pre-incarnate Christ who spoke to Moses. Yahweh/Jehovah of the Old Testament is the one who humbled Himself in the incarnation to take on human flesh and walk among men. Yahweh/Jehovah of the Old Testament is Yeshua/Jesus of the New Testament. Thus, Mosaic Judaism was established by Christ. Messianic Mosaic Judaism was further unfolded by the Messiah, Jesus Christ. While Jesus in His day criticized and even denounced those man-made traditions that were opposed to Scripture, He showed the true Messianic meaning of those things given to Moses. Paul elaborates on this in Hebrew 7-10 and shows the true Antitypes that the types pointed to. We now look to Jesus our heavenly High Priest as He ministers in the heavenly sanctuary, pleading His bood shed once to bear the sins of many, interceding on our behalf before the Mercy Seat of the throne of God.
John 1:1-3 clearly says that Jesus is one with God from the beginning. Jesus is the Creator. He came to be our only Redeemer, our only Mediator, and He ordained that the Holy Spirit is to be His only Dispensor of grace to humanity. I believe this is what Scripture teaches.
Much more could be said. I have already said much on this blog!
My brother in Christ, I do want to wish you Shabbat Shalom, and a blessed New Covenant Pentecost. May the Holy Spirit lead us into all truth - truth revealed by the Holy Spirit through Scripture.
Shalom in Yeshua
My dear friend in Christ,

THANK YOU SO VERY MUCH!

I passed one of your Bretherns “church’s” a couple of days ago in Ormond Beach Florida. I was wondering about the name as its the first time I encountered it.

Ron, if you have any questions of the Catholic Faith, I’d be honored to share out teachings with.

It has been a delight and a pleasure discussing Faith with you.

May our Lord hold you in the palm of His hands, and grant you health, joy, and prosperity, and most of al Shalom!

Love and prayers Ron,
God Bless you!
 
I have a lot more to write, but I have some thoughts:
Jesus said to the Samaritan woman at the well, “For, verily I say unto thee, woman, salvation is of the Jews.” He did not say, “Salvation is of the Catholic Church.” The real historical fact is that, even though there was a Bishop of Rome within the first 100 to 125 years after Christ, there were two other Bishops, one in Alexandria, Egypt, and another in Antioch. They each controlled a segment of what was then the Christian fellowship (the Church.

The use of the word, “Catholic” came nearly 1,000 years after Christ. Up to that time, it was broadly known as "the Patriarchate of Rome. There were a few who used the term Catholic in the period of the time when Mohammed put together his religion based on Christianity, Judaism, and some pagan conceptions that pre-existed the 6th century after Christ. But it was not the common term used.
  1. I always understood that verse to mean that salvation comes from the Jews through Christ, who was a Jew. I never understood it to mean Judaism itself.
  2. That is plain false history. The term Catholic is from circa 100. Read my sig line. That is the most absurd statement about the term “Catholic” I have ever heard.
Also, the ‘acts of Polycarp’, circa same era, use the term. And it’s always used with the word Church: ‘Catholic Church’
 
steve,
thanks for the scriptures. 😃
I know catholics do not like ‘scrpture alone.’ They like traditions added Traditions of men. .
See Rev.22:18-19

God bless,jean
Too bad for Sola Scriptura is a tradition of maen invented by a heretic.
 
As for Stephentlig and the fact that not everything in our faith comes from scripture we’ve had 2000 years of the Christian faith and God has still revealed himself through the lives of the saints and their teaching. Although our scripture stops 2000 years ago as far as I know God has still spoken to his Church so the Catechism is still seen to have been inspired by God. Some non-Conformist faiths wanted to create new churches based on the early Church. This seems to be forgetting about 2000 years of Church history and there has been progression in the Christian faith although we should still stay rooted in the words and actions of Christ.
 
Whoa, what happened? There’s some great posts on here, but I thought this thread was supposed to be about Mary! :confused: 🙂
 
steve,
thanks for the scriptures. 😃
I know catholics do not like ‘scrpture alone.’ They like traditions added Traditions of men. .
See Rev.22:18-19

God bless,jean
Jean dear friend, we too [Catholics"] LOVE the Bible, all if it!

And so does Christ who too LOVED TRADITIONS.

2 Cor. 2: 13 “But we are bound to give thanks to God always for you, brethren beloved by the Lord, because God chose you from the beginning * to be saved, through sanctification by the Spirit * and belief in the truth. 14 To this he called you through our gospel, so that you may obtain the glory of our Lord Jesus Christ. 15* So then, brethren, stand firm and hold to the traditions which you were taught by us, either by word of mouth or by letter.”

**2 Tim. 3:16 16 All scripture is inspired by God and profitable for teaching, for reproof, for correction, and for training in righteousness, 17 that the man of God may be complete, equipped for every good work." **

Jean, my friend, do you think Maybe God would like us to accept everything He Teaches?

Rev. 22: 18-19 “I warn every one who hears the words of the prophecy of this book: if any one adds to them, God will add to him the plagues described in this book, 19 and if any one takes away from the words of the book of this prophecy, God will take away his share in the tree of life and in the holy city, which are described in this book.”

**II Timothy 3:16 (KJV)

“All scripture is given by inspiration of God, and is profitable for doctrine, for reproof, for correction, for instruction in righteousness”**

Its so nice when we can agree on these things😛

Love and prayer’s

Pat
 
Whoa, what happened? There’s some great posts on here, but I thought this thread was supposed to be about Mary! :confused: 🙂
It started out that way, but they ALWAYS turn into Sola Scriptura threads because somewone will eventually ask “Where does the Bible tell us to worship Mary?” At which point we must then explain the difference between veneration and worship, and follow up with the errors of Sola Scriptura.
 
It started out that way, but they ALWAYS turn into Sola Scriptura threads because somewone will eventually ask “Where does the Bible tell us to worship Mary?” At which point we must then explain the difference between veneration and worship, and follow up with the errors of Sola Scriptura.
Ah, I see. Lol, I probably could have figured that out myself, but I am too lazy and too busy to read all the posts. 😛
 
First, I have taken a liking to of calling Mary Mother of God like the Greeks, who never say Mary alone, but either use her title or her title and name together. It offends Protestants even more but I don’t care.

A YouTube video discussed the difference between the ‘Catholic Mary and the Bible Mary.’ The main topic was that when God has a plan it happens with out a choice. That is, if Mary said no during the Annunciation, it would have happened anyway. They used Jonah and the whale through a picture, never spoke about it: Jonah didn’t want to do something but God made a whale swallow him and he did the job anyway. Also, it said Mary would have been scared like every other Jewish teenager should be, and that Gabriel was basically telling her, not asking, what was going to go down. Now I am not saying anything; just thinking. Your thoughts? I never thought about this before.
Most Protestants know little about the Virgin Mary. Please don’t assume they know nothing at all.
The bible clearly teaches Mary gave birth to the son of God. and who is the son? he is God robed in flesh, the Incarnation.
Mt.1:23 reads “The virgin will be with child and will give birth to a son, and they will call him Immanuel, which means “God with us.”
Jesus said in Jn.8:58 “I tell you the truth,” before Abraham was born, I am!” 59. At this time, they (the Jews) picked up stones to stone him, but Jesus hid himself
See Ex.3:14-15

God bless,
jean
 
Too bad for Sola Scriptura is a tradition of maen invented by a heretic.
betts,
This heritic you are referring to? Is it Luther?
Martin Luther never intended to leave the Church. His argument was initially about indulgencies as you may know. However, this is history. We can’t judge another man salvation.
Have you read about Johnt Tetzel? please go to en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Johann_Tetzel

God bless,
jean
 
Another very important aspect of Mary life as mentioned in scripture is the first Miracle,the wedding feast at Cana as enumerated in John 2.When Mary mentioned to Jesus that there was no Wine she had an expectation and perhaps a wish that he would come to the rescue of the bridal party as she would have known about his divine powers.Jesus said his time had not yet come but nevertheless performed the Miracle.This is one reason why Catholics look upon her as an intercessor we believe that he will never say no to his Mother.
 
betts,
This heritic you are referring to? Is it Luther?
Martin Luther never intended to leave the Church. His argument was initially about indulgencies as you may know. However, this is history. We can’t judge another man salvation.
Have you read about Johnt Tetzel? please go to en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Johann_Tetzel

God bless,
jean
Yes, his argument was initially about indulgences, and that abuse was rectified. However he was a heretic. He tried to change the Bible, he invented Sola Scriptura and Sola Fide.
 
Yes, his argument was initially about indulgences, and that abuse was rectified. However he was a heretic. He tried to change the Bible, he invented Sola Scriptura and Sola Fide.
Luther was a very educated man. He had a Law degree for one.
He also was translating the Latin Bible into German. I don’t think he was stupid enough to change anything. His Interpretation of scriptuure was certainly different from the scholars of that time on certain points. Just as we differ today. That doesn’t make a person a heretic to disagree. We all have the same Lord and Savior, Jesus Christ.
The person who denies Jesus Christ is a heretic.

God bless,
jean
.
 
Because the Catholic church teaches that we were Catholic from the day of Pentecost.
steve,
You neglected to provide scripture for your statment. 🙂
The early church was referred to as apostolic. Believers were first called christians at Antioch. Acts11:26 See also Acts 1:25
See 2Tim.3;16. It will give you the author of scripture and why. 🙂

God bless,
jean
 
steve,
You neglected to provide scripture for your statment. 🙂
The early church was referred to as apostolic. Believers were first called christians at Antioch. Acts11:26 See also Acts 1:25
See 2Tim.3;16. It will give you the author of scripture and why. 🙂

God bless,
jean
The Scriptures are incomplete. We must also rely on Sacred Tradition and the teachings of the Early Church Fathers
 
Luther was a very educated man. He had a Law degree for one.
He also was translating the Latin Bible into German. I don’t think he was stupid enough to change anything. His Interpretation of scriptuure was certainly different from the scholars of that time on certain points. Just as we differ today. That doesn’t make a person a heretic to disagree. We all have the same Lord and Savior, Jesus Christ.
The person who denies Jesus Christ is a heretic.

God bless,
jean
.
How would Luther’s education prevent him from changing something? Can you explain this logic to me?
Can you apply it to Satan? It seems he also had a high level of education.
 
Luther was a very educated man. He had a Law degree for one.
He also was translating the Latin Bible into German. I don’t think he was stupid enough to change anything. His Interpretation of scriptuure was certainly different from the scholars of that time on certain points. Just as we differ today. That doesn’t make a person a heretic to disagree. We all have the same Lord and Savior, Jesus Christ.
The person who denies Jesus Christ is a heretic.

God bless,
jean
.
He most certainly DID attempt to chcnge the Bible! Learn your history. He removed 7 books form the OT Canon. He attempted to remove James, Revelation, Jude, and 3 John. He added the word “alone” to Romans 3:28. He promulgated false teachings, making him a heretic.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top