A question about Romans 9

  • Thread starter Thread starter Timothy524
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
Fruit = words (deeds) that glorify God

John 15:5 “I am the vine, you are the branches. Those who abide in me and I in them bear much fruit, because apart from me you can do nothing. Whoever does not abide in me is thrown away like a branch and withers; such branches are gathered, thrown into the fire, and burned. If you abide in me, and my words abide in you, ask for whatever you wish, and it will be done for you. My Father is glorified by this, that you bear much fruit”

As Jesus, Christians do wonders that glorify God, with words.
Yes. Our words, and our deeds. James says (in places like 2:14 & 17), faith that produces no good works can NOT save you, CAN it! (Me-dunamai) It is a dead, unsaved faith.

People of the world are watching us; we are ambassadors for God, 2Cor5:20. They scrutinize the words we say, and they watch critically all the words we say IN BETWEEN our words. For our actions speak far more words than do our mouths! What they know of Him, they know from us!

Do they see Him in us enough that they want what we have? Dear God, let it be so!

:gopray2:
 
Hi, James! 🙂

This is a Catholic board; I’m not going to “argue waterbaptism”. If you’re willing, I would like to cite a couple of verses, and let you make up your own mind.

“But I have a baptism to be baptized with, and how distressed I am until it is accomplished!” Luke12:50

But Jesus said to them, “You do not know what you are asking. Are you able to drink the cup that I drink, or to be baptized with the baptism with which I am baptized?” Mark10:38

Jesus had already been waterbaptized — and He wasn’t going to be waterbaptized again. This “baptism” (the Greek baptizo simply means “immersed”), is speaking of His death and resurrection; the baptism, the cup. The “cup” is His death, Matt26:39, Jn18:11. I don’t think those two verses are speaking of “water”. Do you?

So – my question, when you or I read Romans6:3-5 (united with Him through baptism-into-death), and Eph4:5 (one Lord, one faith, one baptism) — are those two particular verses speaking of water?

Or do you not know that all of us who have been baptized into Christ Jesus have been baptized into His death?
Therefore we have been buried with Him through baptism into death, so that as Christ was raised from the dead through the glory of the Father, so we too might walk in newness of life.
For if we have become united with Him in the likeness of His death, certainly we shall also be (united with Him) in the likeness of His resurrection,

What do you think?
It is refers to water baptism in Romans. Which is why several people prefer immersing people in water as opposed to sprinkling.
 
Yes. Our words, and our deeds. James says (in places like 2:14 & 17), faith that produces no good works can NOT save you, CAN it! (Me-dunamai) It is a dead, unsaved faith.

People of the world are watching us; we are ambassadors for God, 2Cor5:20. They scrutinize the words we say, and they watch critically all the words we say IN BETWEEN our words. For our actions speak far more words than do our mouths! What they know of Him, they know from us!

Do they see Him in us enough that they want what we have? Dear God, let it be so!

:gopray2:
That’s how it started for me, I saw and heard the Father and Jesus in a good catholic priest 🙂 and shortly thereafter connected the dots 🙂
 
It is refers to water baptism in Romans.
Hi, James.

Not to argue – just wanting to know, do you believe Luke12:50 and Mark10:38 are speaking of “waterbaptism”?
Which is why several people prefer immersing people in water as opposed to sprinkling.
You know, JESUS was immersed; so were the Apostles. Historically, many early churches did have “baptismal fonts”, shallow constructions (with drains) and pitchers. But — caught up in the whole “becoming saved” thing, isn’t there a level of …excitement? Why wouldn’t one want to be baptized “just like Jesus and the Apostles”? 🤷

For those with more cash than they can use, there are excursions to the very waters where Jesus & the Apostles were baptized, and you can get “re-dunked”.

(Of course I was “submerged”!)

😃
 
That’s how it started for me, I saw and heard the Father and Jesus in a good catholic priest 🙂 and shortly thereafter connected the dots 🙂
Very kewl. 🙂

Paul said (Rom10), “How shall they believe in Whom they have not heard, and how shall they hear without a preacher?”

We very much can change eternal destinies; both “destroying brothers for whom Christ died” (Rom14:15), AND “saving others snatching them from the fire”! (Jude23)

Let our words serve and proclaim Him, and let our words between our words not differ!

👍
 
Hi, James.

Not to argue – just wanting to know, do you believe Luke12:50 and Mark10:38 are speaking of “waterbaptism”?

You know, JESUS was immersed; so were the Apostles. Historically, many early churches did have “baptismal fonts”, shallow constructions (with drains) and pitchers. But — caught up in the whole “becoming saved” thing, isn’t there a level of …excitement? Why wouldn’t one want to be baptized “just like Jesus and the Apostles”? 🤷

For those with more cash than they can use, there are excursions to the very waters where Jesus & the Apostles were baptized, and you can get “re-dunked”.

(Of course I was “submerged”!)

😃
For the record, Jesus was speaking of His Passion when he spoke of baptism.
 
i was laughing at the use of “darn”, rather than a stronger expletive. 🙂

sometimes i do tell jokes. If we can’t laugh, what’s the point?
Hi!

…I may have left out the “n” (damned)… But Ii actually do find it amusing and sometimes, unexpectedly, laugh out loud… I cannot fathom how they could have come to such conclusions, in spite of the fact that they are placing god as the cause of evil… and they seem to not comprehend how far they are stretching their theology… in the wrong direction! :banghead::banghead::banghead:
That’s why i have listened to them, written down all the verses they use, and discovered scripture that refutes them.
Here is an example of how far some people will go to continue a doctrine:
2pet3:9 "god is patient, not decreeing to perish only those he’s ordained not to perish
(of course he does decree most to perish!), but patiently waits for repentance from all to whom he has decreed repentance and determined the time of their repentance (nevermind, he’s not waiting for anything)!

there are those who really contend god only decrees not-perish, those he has decreed not to perish, and waits even though he’s not really waiting! Is it just me, or is that silly?

It’s mostly because of the assault “sovereign predestined salvation” does on god’s character. No matter how one tries to dodge the issue, god would be responsible for man’s sins!
…wow, I thought only Jehovah Witnesses filtered the Word of God through the Chinese acrobatic academy!

…again; this continues to demonstrate how wrong it is to attempt to understand Scriptures through a selective process.
Have you ever heard their verses separated into “primaries” and “secondaries” before? Some have said acts13:48 should be raised to a primary; but it’s easily refuted both by verse 46, and by the greek. The primaries seem to assert predestined-salvation more directly, and are less obviously refuted.
The deepest desire of my heart is to be a willing and successful vessel for him to reach as many as possible through me. “lord, change me, as you will!”
they apply the “catch-22” — “if a person is unsaved now, then he was never truly saved in the first place.”
this causes wild interpretations (as i just cited above), stamping clear verses with “not really”, and rewriting scripture (like in jn10:26 & 28 they add “not-even-yourselves” to “no one can snatch you from his hand”.

They redefine words; take heb6:4-6 — “photizo-enlightened” becomes superficial (not really), “geuomai-taste” becomes only sample but not really partake (in spite of heb2:9 "jesus tasted death" — i have good information that he really died!). And “metochos-partners” in the holy spirit is somehow unsaved, when “metochos” is fully saved in 3:1, 3:14, and 12:8!

“all” becomes only “some-of-all-types” in 1tim2:1-4 (in spite of “all” including kings and all authority), also in rom5:17-19

that’s exactly the issue! In that, “living-in-sin” is possible! In 1cor10:1-13, “don’t crave evil, don’t be immoral, don’t be covetous” – any of those things read as “not really possible” for the saved? The consequence, “therefore let he who thinks he stand take heed lest he fall”!

Fall — as in, “not really”? Oh yes, really!
I’ve come across it… though not worded in such terms (their religious affiliations were not revealed–though on did right on this forum; can’t recall the denomination)… basically they dissect Scriptures as though they are taking apart a mystery novel… they go to the end of it and construct an interpretation, from their cut-n-paste format, of the outcome as they see fit (not necessarily the author’s intent); then, from their determination, they proclaim and “teach” the “truth” of the story.
Exactly. There are many places where men are judged according to their deeds (rom2:6-8, rev20:13, etc.) — but good deeds never save anyone, and evil deeds never condemn anyone; our deeds, expose where our heart was. A heart that did good deeds knew jesus
, and a heart that did evil did not. That’s the connection with these verses — as john says in 1:5:10 (echoed in places like jn3:18-20), some are condemned because they have not believed the testimony. Their unbelief exposed because of their evil deeds!

Seems so simple – what can we do to stop many from missing it??? :confused:

Exactly that. And – the king clothes us with his righteousness. Matt22:2-14, isaiah61:10, etcetera.
It is this relationship that they completely miss… all through Scriptures we find God allowing man to choose:
I have set before you life and death, blessings and curses. Now choose life, so that you and your children may live
(Deuteronomy 30:19b)
…how dim must the lightbulb be for anyone to think that God does not decree Salvation (Life) for all?

His Concern is that we: “Chose Life!”

God offers man a choice… if man is not able to make a choice (Divine election for some to Salvation and Divine election for all others to damnation), God’s Word is not only disingenuous but totally impotent… is that what God has decreed about His Word?:
11 so is my word that goes out from my mouth:
It will not return to me empty,
but will accomplish what I desire
and achieve the purpose for which I sent it.
(Isaiah 55:11)
It all comes down to “draw near to god that he draws near to you”!
Exactly!

Man retains the choice to seek and abide in God or forfeit Salvation–every single man; all of humanity!

Maran atha!

Angel
 
:amen: !!!

Some things that we perceive as punishments are trials, and some are consequences we inadvertently chose by making wrong decisions. We can linger in hurt from them, or we can learn and grow.

James says (1:12) “blessed is he who perseveres under trials; for when he has (dokimos!) passed the test, he will will receive the Crown of Life, which the Lord has promised to those who love Him.” Dokimos also appears in 2Tim2:15, “be diligent to show yourself approved”.

GoodFella, well done – that is one of the best posts I’ve ever read on the internet.

:grouphug:
Hi!

I fully concur!

St. Paul admonishes the Believers to persevere in Christ, understanding that nothing can separate us from God, if we acknowledge the mystery of our relationship with Him:
35 Who shall separate us from the love of Christ? Shall trouble or hardship or persecution or famine or nakedness or danger or sword? 36 As it is written:
“For your sake we face death all day long;
we are considered as sheep to be slaughtered.”
37 No, in all these things we are more than conquerors through him who loved us. 38 For I am convinced that neither death nor life, neither angels nor demons,[k] neither the present nor the future, nor any powers, 39 neither height nor depth, nor anything else in all creation, will be able to separate us from the love of God that is in Christ Jesus our Lord.
(Romans 8:35-39)
…so we can use our experiences to bolster our resolve and gain spiritual growth… it is Christ Who can fortify and rescue us:
28 “Come to me, all you who are weary and burdened, and I will give you rest. 29 Take my yoke upon you and learn from me, for I am gentle and humble in heart, and you will find rest for your souls. 30 For my yoke is easy and my burden is light.”
(St. Matthew 11:28-30)

Maran atha!

Angel
 
Ask a Calvinist, “Why would they WANT to sneak in and pretend to be saved”? Their doctrine is conflicted!
  1. Unless God sovereignly (monergistically) changes their heart first, they can only desire to pursue sin and reject God!
  2. But some can WANT to be saved (they look at Christians and envy their attitude), they can even believe and be JOYFUL (Lk8:13), but they’re not really saved, God never actually loved or wanted them!
Huh? 🤷

Yes. And “impugns God’s character”, charges Him with causality in sin (doesn’t matter if it’s direct or indirect), denies our responsibility, destroys the motivation to share the Gospel, on and on.

😦
Hi!

…all I can get from this is that spirit of complete dissolution of personal responsibility: ‘I can do no wrong for Christ done it all for me’ or ‘no matter what I do God has already rejected me and damned me for eternity, so why bother.’

This elaborate construct allows the “Believer/Christian” to persevere in sin into infinity and precludes the unrighteous from the guilt of his/her actions since ‘it’s God’s decree!’

…it is as Christ said:
39 “Can the blind lead the blind? Will they not both fall into a pit?"
(St. Luke 6:39b)
…this is so interesting… as I highlighted the Scripture this second passage came to mind:
40 Some Pharisees who were with him heard him say this and asked, “What? Are we blind too?” 41 Jesus said, “If you were blind, you would not be guilty of sin; but now that you claim you can see, your guilt remains.
(St. John 9:40-41)
Christ demonstrates that those who are blind (ignorant) to the Truth (Christ) cannot lead others to the Truth; they will simple fail together… yet, if one is blind to the Truth but persists in his/her blindness (ignorance of the Truth) he/she will perish remaining in darkness (sin).

Maran atha!

Angel
 
Hi, James.

Not to argue – just wanting to know, do you believe Luke12:50 and Mark10:38 are speaking of “waterbaptism”?

You know, JESUS was immersed; so were the Apostles. Historically, many early churches did have “baptismal fonts”, shallow constructions (with drains) and pitchers. But — caught up in the whole “becoming saved” thing, isn’t there a level of …excitement? Why wouldn’t one want to be baptized “just like Jesus and the Apostles”? 🤷

For those with more cash than they can use, there are excursions to the very waters where Jesus & the Apostles were baptized, and you can get “re-dunked”.

(Of course I was “submerged”!)

😃
Hi!

…so all those poor souls that the early Church could not dunk in… they were never Baptized… and all those imprisoned who received Christ through sprinkling, simply failed to meet the “model?”

(…just interjecting a little so as to keep people from flying to the Holy Land or from going broke trying to build pools for immersions!)

Maran atha!

Angel
 
2Pet3:9 "God is patient, not decreeing to perish only those He’s ordained not to perish (of course He does decree most to perish!), but patiently waits for repentance from all to whom He has decreed repentance and determined the time of their repentance (nevermind, He’s not waiting for anything)!

There are those who really contend God only decrees not-perish, those He has decreed not to perish, and waits even though He’s not really waiting! Is it just me, or is that silly?
What Bible version are you citing? Or are you paraphrasing the text according to Calvinist thought? We have this in the KJV:

The Lord is not slack concerning his promise, as some men count slackness; but is longsuffering to us-ward, not willing that any should perish, but that all should come to repentance. - 2 Peter 3, 9***

Calvinists will tell us that Peter is referring to the elect, not mankind. But this doesn’t make sense, since the elect are supposed to have already come to repentance and are saved. Anyway, Peter is referring to God’s antecedent will, viz., God’s desire. It is by His consequent will that God decrees the unrepentant to eternal damnation, while “God desires everyone to be saved and come to the knowledge of the truth” (1 Tim 2:4).

:heaven:
 
For the record, Jesus was speaking of His Passion when he spoke of baptism.
Yes – Luke12:50 and Mark10:38 are speaking of “His Passion” (death on the Cross); not water.

And I think that’s enough said for now; each can relate those verses to Rom6:3-6 and Eph4:5 for himself or herself. If there’s not perfect agreement on what Paul meant, what of it? The day will come when we will all be together with Jesus when He returns; and that’s more important than agreeing on every single point.

Thanx for your answers!

🙂
 
Hi!

…I may have left out the “n” (damned)… But Ii actually do find it amusing and sometimes, unexpectedly, laugh out loud… I cannot fathom how they could have come to such conclusions, in spite of the fact that they are placing God as the cause of evil… and they seem to not comprehend how far they are stretching their theology… in the wrong direction! Keep in mind the motivation — it’s the same thing told to Even in the Garden, "Don’t worry, you won’t really die."

As we discussed, probably the greatest irony ever is the fact that — given the theme of their doctrine – they cannot know they’re saved, until their very last breath!

RE “God associating with evil” – one would think Matt12:25-31 would be scary enough.
…wow, I thought only Jehovah Witnesses filtered the Word of God through the Chinese acrobatic academy!
 
Hi!

I fully concur!

St. Paul admonishes the Believers to persevere in Christ, understanding that nothing can separate us from God, if we acknowledge the mystery of our relationship with Him:
That’s one of the Primaries (Rom8:29-35). But the passage begins with verse 28 — those WHO love God. Everything follows from that; we who love God are predestined for Christlikeness. (We are not predestined TO love God – that would make Matt22:37 silly!)
…so we can use our experiences to bolster our resolve and gain spiritual growth… it is Christ Who can fortify and rescue us:
Matt11:28-31 ONLY makes sense if we really have a choice!

Again, excellent citation.
 
Hi!

…all I can get from this is that spirit of complete dissolution of personal responsibility: ‘I can do no wrong for Christ done it all for me’ or ‘no matter what I do God has already rejected me and damned me for eternity, so why bother.’
You know about “Compatibilism”? They claim “we have responsibility”, but deny the definition of “responsible” — accountable of CAUSE of something within one’s POWER or CONTROL. Exactly what does a Predestinationist think we cause, or control? :confused:
This elaborate construct allows the “Believer/Christian” to persevere in sin into infinity and precludes the unrighteous from the guilt of his/her actions since ‘it’s God’s decree!’
IOW, “complacency”. Reminds me of this:

“'I know your deeds, that you are neither cold nor hot; I wish that you were cold or hot.
…because you are lukewarm, and neither hot nor cold, I will vomit you out of My mouth.” Rev3

God really doesn’t like complacency…
…it is as Christ said:
39 “Can the blind lead the blind? Will they not both fall into a pit?" (St. Luke 6:39b)
…this is so interesting… as I highlighted the Scripture this second passage came to mind:
40 Some Pharisees who were with him heard him say this and asked, “What? Are we blind too?” 41 Jesus said, “If you were blind, you would not be guilty of sin; but now that you claim you can see, your guilt remains. (St. John 9:40-41)
Christ demonstrates that those who are blind (ignorant) to the Truth (Christ) cannot lead others to the Truth; they will simple fail together… yet, if one is blind to the Truth but persists in his/her blindness (ignorance of the Truth) he/she will perish remaining in darkness (sin).
Above I cited two verses in Rev3 “he who has an ear let him hear”; it’s the same in Lk8:18 “take care how you listen”, and Matt13:16 “blessed are your eyes because they see, and your ears because they hear”. Remember Matt13:15 says “they close their OWN eyes”.

Over and over it says, “Open your eyes, and your ears”!
 
Hi!

…so all those poor souls that the early Church could not dunk in… they were never Baptized… and all those imprisoned who received Christ through sprinkling, simply failed to meet the “model?”

(…just interjecting a little so as to keep people from flying to the Holy Land or from going broke trying to build pools for immersions!)
You and I agree on “intent” (like with the Thief on his cross). I bet we also agree that it’s not actually the water that forgives sins; else we would have to keep getting waterbaptized every time we sin.

1Jn1:8-9 says we will sin, but if we (repent) confess our sins He is faithful and just to forgive our sins and to cleanse us from all unrighteousness.
 
What Bible version are you citing? Or are you paraphrasing the text according to Calvinist thought?
Calvinistic paraphrasing (bet you can’t say THAT five times quickly!)

That really is how they understand it, as I’ve learned from years of conversing!
We have this in the KJV:

The Lord is not slack concerning his promise, as some men count slackness; but is longsuffering to us-ward, not willing that any should perish, but that all should come to repentance. - 2 Peter 3, 9***
Calvinists will tell us that Peter is referring to the elect, not mankind. But this doesn’t make sense, since the elect are supposed to have already come to repentance and are saved.
Exactly that. It’s the same with Matt9:12-13; for whom did Jesus-the-Physician come? He said He came for sinners; but (per Calvinism) no one can repent WITHOUT monergistic heart-change (He could not have come for sinners!). But neither could He have come for the REGENERATED, who (by regeneration) are righteous/healthy and do not NEED a Savior/Physician!

For whom did Jesus come? :confused:
Anyway, Peter is referring to God’s antecedent will, viz., God’s desire. It is by His consequent will that God decrees the unrepentant to eternal damnation, while “God desires everyone to be saved and come to the knowledge of the truth” (1 Tim 2:4).
Read the context of 1Tim2:1-4 — they try to say “all” (pas) is really some-of-all-TYPES. Can’t be that, because it includes kings and ALL AUTHORITY (exceeding who will be saved). Has to mean “all everyone”. 1Tim4:10 applies, He is the savior of all men malista/specially/above-all believers.

All provision, specially those who receive it. Rom5:17-19!!!
 
Keep in mind the motivation — it’s the same thing told to Even in the Garden, "Don’t worry, you won’t really die."

As we discussed, probably the greatest irony ever is the fact that — given the theme of their doctrine – they cannot know they’re saved, until their very last breath!

RE “God associating with evil” – one would think Matt12:25-31 would be scary enough.

That really is how they understand 2Pet3:9!

I believe the technical term, is “a priori”. “Formed or conceived beforehand”.

It’s parallel to an old adage, “my mind is already made up, don’t confuse me with the facts”.

That’s why it’s necessary to confront Reformed Theology, in its entirety. Only when the whole thing is disassembled, do they begin to doubt what heretofore seemed sound.

We’re supposed to form our conclusions after reading what the Apostles wrote, not trying to figure out how their words could fit what we already “know to be true”.

To be fair, the refutation of the four Primaries does seem to be “a priori”. For instance, Eph1:4-5 — understanding that it was JESUS “foreknown before time” (1Pet1:20-21), and God’s predestined plan was bestowed on us in the Beloved. But engaging the four Primaries after dealing with all fifty-five (plus!) Secondaries, and being forced to accommodate them to the clear “you-can-fall-from-salvation” verses (like 2Cor11:3), the Primaries refutations are sound.

Deut30 is an excellent citation. And stronger, its connection with Rom10:6-10, absolutely establishes that “the word-of-faith” is in the hearts of BOTH those who believe AND those who turn away. 100% choice. Did you comment on Deut30:12 being a foundational refutation of Monergism, the basis of Reformed Theology?

“A-priori”. RT is a superior position; it’s pleasing thinking oneself “a special favorite of God”. Not meaning to insult anyone, that’s really the mindset.

Amen! Why did God set it up so that A&E could fall? It may be that was the only possibility for LOVE. 1Cor13:5 “love cannot demand its own way”.

God is love!

Not only does God offer us a choice, but it’s the SAME choice tomorrow, and the next day and the next! Which part of 1Cor10:1-13 (especially 12-13) is unclear? 🤷

How can so much of Scripture be warning over and over (and over again) to “abide in salvation”, and still there are many OSAS proponents?

I think we discussed Rev3:5, 3:6, 3:12, 3:21-22, and especially 3:11?
Hi!

…for me it boils down to this:
11 He came unto his own, and his own received him not. 12 But as many as received him, he gave them power to be made the sons of God, to them that believe in his name. 13 Who are born, not of blood, nor of the will of the flesh, nor of the will of man, but of God.
(St. John 1:11-13)
God Salvific Plan was in effect from before the Creation of the world; Salvation was hidden in Christ Jesus so that all could be Saved; yet, due to man being Created in God’s Image and Likeness (part of which is his free will) this allows him to choose or reject God’s Salvific Plan, which is Found only in Jesus…

By rejecting Jesus, man forfeits becoming a child of God, thusly loosing Salvation; conversely, by Receiving Jesus, man accepts God’s Gift of Life!

All of Scriptures point to this very fact. We can choose to reject God’s Salvific Plan but we cannot compel God to “Save” us because we have come up with a construct of our own.

Maran atha!

Angel
 
Hi, JCRichton!
…for me it boils down to this:
11 He came unto his own, and his own received him not. 12 But as many as received him, he gave them power to be made the sons of God, to them that believe in his name. 13 Who are born, not of blood, nor of the will of the flesh, nor of the will of man, but of God. (St. John 1:11-13)
That’s as good a refutation of Calvinism as was ever required. Per Reformed Theology, the “right to be sons of God”, is predestined by God, being set before the Creation.

But here is John saying "no, the right to become sons of God, is not granted until someone receives Him." (That of course fits Eph2:3, “we were children of wrath the same as the rest”)
God Salvific Plan was in effect from before the Creation of the world; Salvation was hidden in Christ Jesus so that all could be Saved;
Why did God create a world where man could fall? Clearly He knew about the fall, before He created things; why did He make it this way? It’s a valid question. My personal understanding is that because He is love, it’s the only way He could have created it.

We are commanded to love God; if we were not free to say “yes” or “no”, it would not be love.
yet, due to man being Created in God’s Image and Likeness (part of which is his free will) this allows him to choose or reject God’s Salvific Plan, which is Found only in Jesus…
“For (Christ) was foreknown before the foundation of the world, but has appeared in these last times for the sake of you
who through Him are believers in God, who raised Him from the dead and gave Him glory, so that your faith and hope are in God.” 1Pet1:20-21

“Foreknown” — proginōskō, King James “foreordained”.

Before any atom was formed, before space or time itself existed, Jesus was ordained.
By rejecting Jesus, man forfeits becoming a child of God, thusly loosing Salvation; conversely, by Receiving Jesus, man accepts God’s Gift of Life!
Yes. And – over and over and over we’re warned against “being deceived away from Jesus”. A true child-of-God can become “illegitimate” by ceasing to submit to His discipline. Heb12:7-9.

There is no fear in our salvation, because it is a gift of grace and God will never revoke our gift; but there must be fear in our walk with Him — “do not be conceited, but fear; for if God did not spare the natural branches, neither will He spare you. Behold then the kindness and severity of God — to those who fell severity, to you kindness if you CONTINUE in His kindness else you also will be cut off!”

:eek:

It’s not that we hang over the very fires of Hell as we cling with trembling muscles to the rim; no, we walk confidently with our hand in His, painfully aware of our weakness and ability to turn away from Him.

If I was married — would I have to consciously work on increasing my relationship? Of course. Why would God be any different?
All of Scriptures point to this very fact. We can choose to reject God’s Salvific Plan but we cannot compel God to “Save” us because we have come up with a construct of our own.
There is no sin too great, no offense too horrible, to turn God’s love away from anyone. God so loved every person reading this, that Jesus died so that each of us could live. The secret of Christianity is that “we are new creations” – we put on the new man (or woman!), we are therefore not the same person as the one who did that offense, in God’s eyes it is as if we never sinned. This is a position absolutely entered by conscious choice — and it’s the same choice tomorrow, and the next day, and the next.

This is my motivation – whether talking to Protestants, to Catholics, or to anyone else — to encourage brothers and sisters closer to Him. To stop trying to “be good for God”, but rather to learn how to let Him be our goodness through us. To not promote a complacent “sit-back-and-let-God-do-everything”, but to truly take His hand, and let Him lead us in paths of righteousness; picking up our own feet to firmly follow in His footsteps.

(Hope I worded that right!)

:grouphug:
 
It’s not that we hang over the very fires of Hell as we cling with trembling muscles to the rim; no, we walk confidently with our hand in His, painfully aware of our weakness and ability to turn away from Him.

If I was married — would I have to consciously work on increasing my relationship? Of course. Why would God be any different?

This is my motivation – whether talking to Protestants, to Catholics, or to anyone else — to encourage brothers and sisters closer to Him. To stop trying to “be good for God”, but rather to learn how to let Him be our goodness through us. To not promote a complacent “sit-back-and-let-God-do-everything”, but to truly take His hand, and let Him lead us in paths of righteousness; picking up our own feet to firmly follow in His footsteps.
“Take care, brethren, that there not be in any one of you an evil, unbelieving heart that falls away from the living God.
But** encourage one another day after day,** as long as it is still called “Today,” so that none of you will be hardened by the deceitfulness of sin.
For we have become partakers (partners!) of Christ, if we hold fast the beginning of our assurance firm until the end.” Heb3:12-14

🙂
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top