A question concerning the ontological argument

  • Thread starter Thread starter Philus
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
Therefore, an existence is not greater than non-existence and therefore a being that which no greater can be conceived must not necessarily exist. If the previous statement is accurate, then the ontological argument fails to prove that god must exist.
Well, this is just off the top of my head, but it seems to me that God does not “exist” or “not exist”. God is existence itself.

God does not love. God is love.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top