Diana,
Please. I’m trying to have a conversation here. If you just want to respond with snarky sarcasm I think it proves you have weak arguments.
Actually, let me refresh your memory:
dianaiad:
You are missing the part, I think, that your argument is as much against God in any form, spirit or not, as it is against God having a physical body.
After all, if God is apart from the universe He created, then it doesn’t much matter what He is comprised of, does it?
To which you replied to my use of the word “if” in the second sentence, rather than the actual point, which was that your argument is “as much against God in any form, spirit or not, as it is against God having a physical body.”
In that second sentence, I used a perfectly acceptable cause/effect relationship of “if/then”.
IF God is apart from the universe He created, THEN it doesn’t matter what matter/spirit/whatever forms His substance, does it? It is His, apart from the universe He created.
So you come back, not with an argument against my point, but rather an invalid criticism of my grammar…and that, sir, is a classic strawman. I called you on it. If that’s considered ‘snarky,’ so be it.
However, since it is important to you, I will phrase it differently–especially since we agree that God created the universe.
God created the universe. Since He created it, and it did not create Him, we don’t get to dictate what He looks like, of what matter/spirit/substance He is formed. He can have a body, or not, as He actually IS, whether it messes with our sensibilities or not.
Everything I have read points to that. He created the universe. He has a body…and it is utter silliness to insist that because He is ‘apart from the universe’ He cannot have a physical body. There is no way we can impose such a restriction upon God. There is no way we can impose ANY restriction/requirement upon Him.