V
valient_Lucy
Guest
I’m well aware that Christopher West is a populizer of TOB by JP2. I read chapters out of Good News about Sex and Marriage a few months ago. The advice focused on what singles couldn’t do, and the only advice that he gave was wait (in other words, don’t live in the present, live in a future fantasy world) pray (good advice) and to remind us that we’ll be married to Christ in heaven and we’ll be part of the communion of saints. In other words, “Don’t worry single person, you’ll be dead soon!”Actually West is a popularizer of JPII, so for me he saves me from reading the formidable TOB (a huge book that sits on my bookshelf unread). The post I recommended to you is JPII via his popularizer West. It is loaded with quotes from the Catechism, Aquinas and John Paul II. Hardly West’s opinion but his marshalling of sources to answer questions.
Perhaps a better reference for you might be Dawn Eden. I reworked a list of reasons she gave for being chaste here:
payingattentiontothesky.com/2009/12/30/dawn-eden%e2%80%99s-reasons-to-be-chaste-a-short-list/
Bad advice usually comes from nitwits – whether they are married or not is of little consequence (I would imagine). I became interested in the topic of prudence and temperance (of which chastity is a subset) so there are a number of readings on the topic at payingattentiontothesky.
I always found hating oneself is a developed taste. Glad you had an epiphany on the topic: I wish I had one but have nothing to offer. Please share if it is not too personal. PM me if you like.
dj
Yeah, super helpful.
I was on retreat this weekend. The retreat was about Mary, and a priest was talking about how Mary is a model for all vocations. When the priest talked about the vocation to the priesthood and religous life, he talked about the vow of chastity, and how single people aren’t properly living the virtue of chastity, otherwise they would understand the vocation of priests and religous. He said, “If a priest is trying to live chastity as a negative, ie, he views chastity as ‘I can’t do this, I can’t do that’ good luck!” He stressed that priests, religous, and singles must learn to integrate their sexuality into their whole person, and to give themselves completely to everyone. He urged us to “lose sleep over the salvation of others.”
In that moment, I realized two things.
- My understanding of chastity was negative, ie, purely a list of things I couldn’t do.
2 As an unmarried person, I am called to love everyone, and to give myself to everyone right now. No married person had ever taught me this. I understood that virginity and chastity isn’t limiting. If anything, marriage is limiting, becaue you are only called to love your spouse and children. If you’re not married, you’re called to love everyone!
A married person could not have answered those questions. They would be simply baffled by the first question. That’s not speculation. Many of the married posters who responded to this thread were kind, but utterly confused and horrified by what I was feeling. And they would be incapable of giving the advice that the priest gave me about how to live at this present moment, because they are not called to integrate their sexuality into their whole person in order that they might love everyone. They could explain the teachings of the Church, but they can’t give advice on how to live that, and they certainly cannot exemplfy this in their lives, because that is not their calling.
I’m not really angry at them. I see them a bit like the Apostles. They fished all night, but they caught nothing.