M
Mickey_Finn
Guest
I know you are Irish, and I have a passing knowledge of your history.
Living under a government that has set out to brutally exploit your homeland and your people is never pleasant regardless of the government type.What would the Irish know about living under a Monarchy?
Oh that’s right, never mind.![]()
I was just joking there.Living under a government that has set out to brutally exploit your homeland and your people is never pleasant regardless of the government type.
North Korea is an example of the state being the religion. I can’t imagine the religion being the state can go much better.I think any theocracy, regardless of the religious tradition on which it is based, ends up being essentially North Korea. If you liked Sharia…
Looks awkwardly at the first crusade, Charlemagne, the Spanish inquisition, and Olaf Trygfason. Frankly respecting people is the important bit in my opinion.In a good Cathoiclic society, almost any form of government will work well, in a bad non-Catholic society, any form of government will work badly.
We don’t need to change the form of government, we need to pray and evangelize!
The Vatican is more like a theocratic city.The Vatican is a theocracy, and they do a lot better than most governments.
Would that be your view of the Papal States?It depends on what kind of theocracy. The Vatican is a theocracy, and they do a lot better than most governments.
A theocracy in any form is not wise. History is replete with the problematic nature of theocracy no matter how well intended. Strictly speaking, I would much rather live in a democracy. BTW: I would be interested to know if your definition of “a culture of death” is inclusive of the death penalty?Lets get real the worst part of democracy is everyone gets to vote the uninformed the uneducated the lazy and so on. Including people who support a culture of death
By far the best form of government would be a monarchy that supports all catholic teachings why as catholics aren’t we pushing this more
The Vatican is a theocracy. Should we disestablish the sovereignty of the Vatican?A theocracy in any form is not wise. History is replete with the problematic nature of theocracy no matter how well intended. Strictly speaking, I would much rather live in a democracy. BTW: I would be interested to know if your definition of “a culture of death” is inclusive of the death penalty?
I agree! History tells us that the church allied with human government has never worked well. A system of checks and balances is required because power corrupts.A theocracy in any form is not wise. History is replete with the problematic nature of theocracy no matter how well intended.
Perhaps we should if we desire a non-autocratic form.The Vatican is a theocracy. Should we disestablish the sovereignty of the Vatican?
Could you cite your sources?Theocracy will save our sick democracies
Good points.Democracy is horrible: secular, man-centered mob-rule.
Theocracy is even worse, however, for it establishes the Church entirely within the State, and marries the State to the Church. This is absolutely horrible, because - despite pious sentiments about baptizing politics - it is always the Church that is corrupted by the state, and not the other way around.
When the state is the church and vice versa, bishops become fat, priests become rich, and the religious are turned into agents of the ministers. The Church is entangled in deceit, treachery, lies, bribery, and corruption. Men are not so strong as to hold back from endless benefices and gifts. The most Catholic countries with an established Church were also creators of the worst evil: France gave us Voltaire, for example, because Voltaire saw the endless corruption of French bishops and thought this discredited the Church. Though he was wrong, it is the common thing that happens to the population in such kingdoms and nations. In this life, theocracy leads to the death of souls, for men are disobedient: clergy and laity alike.
Separation of church and state may be an atheistic communist debating point, but I think even the worst enemies of the church are correct to want separation. It preserves the Church from the horrible influences of the fallen state.