A warning from Pope Francis: Don't politicize the synod [CNA]

  • Thread starter Thread starter CNA_News
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
C

CNA_News

Guest
http://www.catholicnewsagency.com/i...Credit_Daniel_Iba_n_ez_CNA_5_20_15.jpgVatican City, Oct 5, 2015 / 08:47 am (CNA/EWTN News).- Pope Francis opened the Synod on the Family with a reminder that it’s not a forum whereby leaders come to an agreement, but a journey of openness to the Holy Spirit and “apostolic courage” against worldly temptations that can lead people away from the truth.

“The synod is not a conference or a parlor, nor is it a parliament or a senate where we come to an agreement,” he said. Rather, it the Church journeying together “to interpret reality with the eyes of faith and the heart of God.”

Addressing the synod fathers on the first day of interventions of the three-week gathering, the Pope said participants must “assume apostolic courage of evangelical humility and of confident prayer” in order to give the Holy Spirit space to carry out his actions.

Such “apostolic courage,” he said, “is not intimidated by the seductions of the world which tend to put out the light of truth from the hearts of men,” thereby leading them away from God.

Pope Francis went on to say that unless the bishops open themselves to guidance by the Holy Spirit, their decisions will become mere “decorations” which serve to “cover and hide” the Gospel, rather than glorify it.

This year’s Synod on the Family, which runs from Oct. 4-25, is the second and larger of two such gatherings to take place in the course of a year. Like its 2014 precursor, the focus of the 2015 Synod of Bishops will be the family, this time with the theme: “The vocation and mission of the family in the Church and the modern world.”

Pope Francis’ Oct. 5 address to participants gathered in the Vatican’s Paul VI Synod hall continued to describe the role of the Synod as the Church interrogating her own fidelity to the deposit of faith.

In this way, he said, the Church demonstrates that she is not simply a “museum” to be looked at, but “a living source from which the Church drinks, while “satisfying the thirst” and “illuminating the deposit of life.”

The Holy Spirit speaks through the many languages represented by the Synod Fathers open to being “guided by the God who always surprises,” the Pope said.

He also appealed for the participants to have an evangelical humility whereby they empty themselves of their “own conventions and prejudices,” listen to one another, without judgments, finger pointing, or a sense of superiority.

The Pope concluded by reiterating that the function of the Synod is not to arrive at a consensus, nor is it a place of negotiations, agreements, or compromises.

Through apostolic courage, evangelical humility, and trustful prayer, he said, may the Holy Spirit “guide us, illuminate us, and cause us to put before our eyes with our personal opinions, faith in God, the good of the Church, and the salus animarum (salvation of souls).”

feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/catholicnewsagency/dailynews?d=yIl2AUoC8zA
http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/catholicnewsagency/dailynews/~4/mih-J52NQ8k

Full article…
 
I just went to the article. No where in the article does it show where the Pope actually said what the headline says he said. What is so hard about accuracy in journalism?
 
I just went to the article. No where in the article does it show where the Pope actually said what the headline says he said. What is so hard about accuracy in journalism?
I guess the author extrapolated that from this comment… “The synod is not a conference or a parlor, nor is it a parliament or a senate where we come to an agreement”

The article could just as easily have read…“A warning from Pope Francis: Don’t drink tea and eat cake at the synod”… because he said it wasn’t a parlor.

You’ve got to laugh.🤷
 
Something I hope will catch on here!
If we could all just seek to genuinely understand one another positions and find the capacity to empathize rather than seek debate all the time it would heal deep rifts in the body of Christ. To much attention is given for disputing and debating, before there is real understanding of one another. One of the great joys in life is to be able to appreciate and value differing opinions form your own without being provoked emotional by them.
 
How, in ANY way is it remotely political to be CLEAR on what the bible and God teaches?
 
How, in ANY way is it remotely political to be CLEAR on what the bible and God teaches?
If that was his implication, I am not sure what he meant. These are men from all different cultures and countries. They share no common poliitical party or identity. They are Catholics. What the Church teaches is clear; they will discuss the nuances and pastoral care.

Avoiding being political seems like something to be said to those of us here, or after a tragedy occurs (take note, Mr. President. And yes, I was probably being political…)
 
After reading through the article a couple of times, it is clear that Pope Francis is perhaps having a problem getting some of the bishops to really get the gist of a synod. The story recounts “Pope Francis went on to say that unless the bishops open themselves to guidance by the Holy Spirit, their decisions will become mere “decorations” which serve to “cover and hide” the Gospel, rather than glorify it.”

Then … *"He also appealed for the participants to have an evangelical humility whereby they empty themselves of their “own conventions and prejudices,” listen to one another, without judgments, finger pointing, or a sense of superiority.

The Pope concluded by reiterating that the function of the Synod is** not to arrive at a consensus, nor is it a place of negotiations, agreements, or compromises.**"*

He doesn’t want that dynamic of competing political parties but more a contributing of everybodies ideas and letting God surprise us with what He makes out of all that lot.
 
After reading through the article a couple of times, it is clear that Pope Francis is perhaps having a problem getting some of the bishops to really get the gist of a synod. The story recounts “Pope Francis went on to say that unless the bishops open themselves to guidance by the Holy Spirit, their decisions will become mere “decorations” which serve to “cover and hide” the Gospel, rather than glorify it.”

Then … "He also appealed for the participants to have an evangelical humility whereby they empty themselves of their “own conventions and prejudices,” listen to one another, without judgments, finger pointing, or a sense of superiority.

The Pope concluded by reiterating that the function of the Synod is** not to arrive at a consensus, nor is it a place of negotiations, agreements, or compromises.**"

He doesn’t want that dynamic of competing political parties but more a contributing of everybodies ideas and letting God surprise us with what He makes out of all that lot.
He is basically saying he wants to avoid preconceived prejudices and let the HS work through each Bishop. That’s fine, but the Holy Spirit may well allow for come Bishops to speak and behave as they always have. Pope Francis has to allow for that. One cannot assume that if everyone’s position remains the same and steadfast, that somehow the Holy Spirit was lacking.
 
Um. . . . . one can always hope I suppose.

(not holding breath)
Look at any topic on the environment or any topic on a shooting like the one in Oregon. It gets political in seconds.
 
He is basically saying he wants to avoid preconceived prejudices and let the HS work through each Bishop. That’s fine, but the Holy Spirit may well allow for come Bishops to speak and behave as they always have. Pope Francis has to allow for that. One cannot assume that if everyone’s position remains the same and steadfast, that somehow the Holy Spirit was lacking.
‘Hostile inflexibility’ is obviously one of the big problem areas that undermine synod work as Pope Francis mentioned that in the closing speech of the 2014 synod. Being that Pope St John XIII also referred to people wanting to stay in the past in the opening address of Vatican II… I’d say it is a huge problem area in preventing the Holy Spirits work through the Church.
 
‘Hostile inflexibility’ is obviously one of the big problem areas that undermine synod work as Pope Francis mentioned that in the closing speech of the 2014 synod. Being that Pope St John XIII also referred to people wanting to stay in the past in the opening address of Vatican II… I’d say it is a huge problem area in preventing the Holy Spirits work through the Church.
I’d say people wanting to modernize the Church teachings to align with societal trends prevents the Holy Spirit from accomplishing anything even moreso, although neither is preferable.

And again, it isn’t hostile inflexibility to listen to the Spirit and arrive right where you started – it simply means you were correct to begin with. It means you refuse to listen to the Spirit at all.
 
I’d say people wanting to modernize the Church teachings to align with societal trends prevents the Holy Spirit from accomplishing anything even moreso, although neither is preferable.
I do not see this as a changing or modernization of teaching. A change of doctrine is not part of the discussion.
 
I do not see this as a changing or modernization of teaching. A change of doctrine is not part of the discussion.
No one said it was. It was implied keeping the Church rooted in the past is an impediment to the Holy Spirit working. I simply posited that it may or may not be, and that moving forward with societal trends doesn’t imply the HS is at work. The HS may want us to stay rigid in past teachings. One cannot say arbitrarily and definitively.

I was speaking irrespective of this Synod mind you. this Synod should in theory have a very focused subject matter, despite some ludicrous suggestions by Bishops to discuss irrelevant topics like female Deacons…
 
I do not see this as a changing or modernization of teaching. A change of doctrine is not part of the discussion.
It is looking at changes to ‘pastoral practice’. Does pastoral practice not represent doctrine lived out in reality? If you change pastoral practice you are in effect changing doctrine as it is lived out.
 
It is looking at changes to ‘pastoral practice’. Does pastoral practice not represent doctrine lived out in reality? If you change pastoral practice you are in effect changing doctrine as it is lived out.
Doctrine can be expressed in more than one type of pastoral practice. Changing the later does not change doctrine.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top