Mgray,
I understand your wish and desire. I cannot accomodate you.
You suggest that there is an argument. I see none.
There are those that ascribe to addiction/disease and that is an unproved theory. If it is a disease then your paradigm forces the issue. Cancer is a disease. How do you get it? What is the epidemiology? What is the Pathophysiology? What is the natural history? How is it transmitted? How do you treat it? What is the success in treatments? Are there many treatments or just one?
The paradigm of diseases forces the questions. I don’t call it a disease. If you want no percentages then step out of the disease model.
The Catholic Church was founded by Christ, has revealed truths. Some do not accept revealed truths. It has grown to over a billion in the World.
AA was founded by a man/men that disguised religion as a program and have no revealed truths, some accept the precepts, some do not, many fall away and never go back, in fact the majority that start in a year fail to return. Those that stay adapt a point of view that is incongruent with reality and then plead against reality as you do.
If you don’t want percentages then tell those that study the process to aid those that want help.
Those that want help want to know what the percentage of success is for methods that work and those that don’t work.
Dismiss yourself from the discussion if you don’t want percentages and be happy to say you have no urge to drink today, you found success in AA however your experience does not translate to the world experience and those that fail in AA should look elsewhere and not be ridiculed as if something is wrong with them and not the program.
Ok…