Wasn’t Jenny Slate the one who got kicked off SNL (for dropping an F-bomb on live TV on HER FIRST EPISODE)?
I don’t think it’s wrong to discuss abortion in the media - I think that much of the problems we have evangelizing about the evils of abortion is that it isn’t discussed, or when it is discussed it’s in an abstract context (“I’m for women’s rights though I’d never get an abortion myself”) or somehow couched as a solution to a greater evil (“Would you make a woman bear her rapist’s child?”). What isn’t discussed is something like the scenario in the movie - a woman does something stupid and ends up pregnant. Not wanting to or being able to support a child, she can either adopt or abort. If that comes up as an honest conversation in the movie, then I welcome it.
What the movie doesn’t have is the statistically-average abortion - black, young and poor. Instead we have funny, white, New York Jewish girl from a divorced family.
And do we know whether she has the abortion? I think the movie wanted to make the point - “Pro-choice doesn’t mean you have to have the abortion. Just that you have the option frames the decision itself.” I hope that, if Slate’s character doesn’t have the abortion, there’s at least an honest discussion about it. I think both sides need to be treated with gravity or the conversation won’t be accepted. If she does have the abortion, does she have any feelings about it? Or is it just “Oh, well, I can get on with life?”
Think Juno, which would have probably collapsed and burned if the plot had instead been:
- Juno’s adoption falls through as Jennifer Garner’s character decides to move back to NY.
- Juno asks Paulie to take her to the abortion clinic.
- Paulie decides he can’t do it, so Juno drives herself.
- The movie ends with Juno, calling Paulie and asking him to please pick up, but he doesn’t, and then she collapses sobbing uncontrollably by herself in her room.
So I’m not going to condemn the film before I see it but I really hope that at least some things are taken seriously. While I didn’t appreciate the morals in “Friends with Benefits” I do appreciate at least the connection between body and heart, that you can’t just have a string of one-night-stands and that sex isn’t meaningless. No, I didn’t expect the film to show them being chaste and getting married, and I don’t like that it seems to say “Ladies, sleep with the guy and he’ll eventually fall for you” but at least it got the “get intimate with someone and your’re going to have feelings for them” part right. If we could just frame the discussion like that to young men, “Hey, don’t sleep with a girl unless you’re ready to break her heart.”