reuters.com/article/2012/01/23/us-abortion-idUSTRE80M2BS20120123
But I am still left wondering, safer for who?
But I am still left wondering, safer for who?
It certainly isn’t safer for the baby.reuters.com/article/2012/01/23/us-abortion-idUSTRE80M2BS20120123
But I am still left wondering, safer for who?
Likely safer for their bottom line.It certainly isn’t safer for the baby.
WEll of course. Obstetrician malpractice insurance is the most expensive in the country. Many OB/GYN doctors have given up delivering babies completely.Likely safer for their bottom line.
Such Stupid statement: An abortion of 2 weeks and 2 grames baby is safer than the birth of a 3 kilo babyreuters.com/article/2012/01/23/us-abortion-idUSTRE80M2BS20120123
But I am still left wondering, safer for who?
Well maybe safer in the short term, here and now, but what about to her overall health. (though surgical abortion comes with risks you don’t encounter in any kind of childbirth, like perforated uterus and bowl among others). Cancer rates skyrocket with an abortion, mental health problems, infertility, etc.It probably is safer for the woman. So? What a pointless, inflammatory study.
Crock. Bet they didn’t take into account post abortion depression
Agreed.Crock. Bet they didn’t take into account post abortion depression
In other news, the unbiased Guttmacher Institute found…Reuters Pushes Biased Study Claiming Abortion Safer Than Birth:
lifenews.com/2012/01/24/reuters-pushes-biased-study-claiming-abortion-safer-than-birth/
Likely safer for their bottom line.
I have to agree to this. The only thing ‘safer’ is just the likely risk that the OB/GYN or any doctors won’t be sued.WEll of course. Obstetrician malpractice insurance is the most expensive in the country. Many OB/GYN doctors have given up delivering babies completely.
i think its safe to assume they mean the pregnant woman.reuters.com/article/2012/01/23/us-abortion-idUSTRE80M2BS20120123
But I am still left wondering, safer for who?