T
TarAshly
Guest
Traditional Ang:
i agree with you Michael, i found her whole side of the story sick and sociopathic. my pity and sympathy are for the baby boy she murdered, not her sorry selfish sad excuse for a mother. i wish they would have quit calling her that. any woman who has an abortion is no mother. rather a selfish sick individual who does not value life. i hope she doesnt get one single dime from any lawsuit either. she should pay for what shes done,(by that i mean not made to look like a victim) not be glorified for it.Loraroe:
After intensive counselling, this BORN-AGAIN CHRISTIAN decides that her ONLY OPTION was to have her SON murdered! She even knew what she was doing!
Am I the only one wondering what’s wrong here and asking what’s happened?
I agree with you - Something’s missing.
Angele was probably too ashamed to admit to her church that she was PREGNANT out of wedlock, but this was NO solution!
But, and I don’t want to increae Angele’s pain, but don’t people get that you don’t solve the SHAME of an OUT-OT WEDLOCK PREGNANCY and BIRTH by HAVING AN ABORTION? You don’t DO PENANCE for ADULTERY by COMMITTING MURDER!
EVERY BIT OF PAIN we read about in that article is because ANGELE CHOSE TO HAVE THE ABORTION!
Can she, or anyone else, say that giving the boy up for adoption would have been anywhere near as painful as what she experienced?
I don’t think so.
Blessings and Peace, Michael