Abortion staff ignores baby boy born alive?

  • Thread starter Thread starter jdnation
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
40.png
legeorge:
I see so called “Christians” going in and out of the abortion clinic all the time. Some have crosses on their mirrors or those fish emblems on their cars. :confused: These are the people who are supposed to be fighting injustices like this! Not participating in them! I am afraid that the woman in this story may not have all her faculties intact. It is horror stories like this that make me wonder why we still have legal baby-killing through any stage of pregnancy. Couldn’t we at least get a ban on late term abortions or something? This is completely disgusting!!! All abortion is disgusting, of course, but don’t you think we could get a late-term abortion bill passed first, and then work from there? How many people could look at these pictures and not be horrified? :mad:
Click to expand...
Their justifications for abortion bother me so much. I actually heard one woman say that abortion is OK because it sends the baby straight to God…and that the baby doesn’t have to experience the evils of the world.

I had to walk away…see what OSAS can do to you? The sin of murder “doesn’t count” because you’re saved…and the belief that all babies are automatically saved is an excuse to murder them. Horrible. :mad:
 
This is too horrible to even imagine…:crying:We just have to keep praying and trying to get the message out.

Once I sent an e-mail to my friends showing a live baby who was having a procedure outside the mother’s womb and his beautiful little hand was pushing out like he was saying “hey you guys I’m alive!”…
I was asked by some not send anything like that ever again because it was just too upsetting… :banghead:
 
40.png
Annunciata:
I was asked by some not send anything like that ever again because it was just too upsetting… :banghead:
Click to expand...
Yeah, I have experienced that same thing. When something is graphic, people have a hard time.
 
40.png
Annunciata:
I was asked by some not send anything like that ever again because it was just too upsetting… :banghead:
Click to expand...
Yeah, and some of those same people will send out pornographic e-mails that they think are funny and call us prudes when we object.
 
40.png
Annunciata:
Once I sent an e-mail to my friends showing a live baby who was having a procedure outside the mother’s womb and his beautiful little hand was pushing out like he was saying “hey you guys I’m alive!”…
I was asked by some not send anything like that ever again because it was just too upsetting… :banghead:
Click to expand...
They thought that beautiful affirmation of life before birth was too upsetting??? :eek:
 
40.png
JimO:
Yeah, and some of those same people will send out pornographic e-mails that they think are funny and call us prudes when we object.
Click to expand...
You have got that one right! They just don’t want to be reminded… We live in a culture of DEATH!:banghead: And, Porn is one of the # 1 destroyers of the family!:mad:
 
40.png
Fitz:
Yeah, I have experienced that same thing. When something is graphic, people have a hard time.
Click to expand...
Maybe…just maybe if they really took a look at some of this they would be forced to agree that abortion is MURDER!!!
 
40.png
Annunciata:
Once I sent an e-mail to my friends showing a live baby who was having a procedure outside the mother’s womb and his beautiful little hand was pushing out like he was saying “hey you guys I’m alive!”…
I was asked by some not send anything like that ever again because it was just too upsetting… :banghead:
Click to expand...
Is it the picture of Baby Samuel? He had surgery for spina bifida. If so, I have this picture on my fridge. It’s a beautiful picture!
 
40.png
MaryB23:
Is it the picture of Baby Samuel? He had surgery for spina bifida. If so, I have this picture on my fridge. It’s a beautiful picture!
Click to expand...
I’m not sure…but it was being passed around in the Pro-life Community a while back and I received it in an e-mail…
His little hand is sticking right out there as if to say "get ready world because I’m on my way " …🙂
It is indeed a beautiful picture!👍
 
Wait a minute. This woman said she was sorry. I don’t get why people are saying she had no remorse. She said that she was sorry for “ever coming here, but grateful that he was born alive” Yes, it’s horrible that she left him in a toilet, but she said she was afraid of hurting him. Wrong, yes, but think of the circumstances- she obviously wasn’t thinking clearly. I am not trying to justify what she did, but there’s alot of people out there who do wrong when under great stress.
 
40.png
Annunciata:
This is too horrible to even imagine…:crying:We just have to keep praying and trying to get the message out.

Once I sent an e-mail to my friends showing a live baby who was having a procedure outside the mother’s womb and his beautiful little hand was pushing out like he was saying “hey you guys I’m alive!”…
I was asked by some not send anything like that ever again because it was just too upsetting… :banghead:
Click to expand...
I wonder what is was that was upsetting. How bizarre. It’s a beautiful picture that portrays the amazing advances in modern medicine, the love we have even for our unborn babies, and the beauty of life, no matter how small. That’s upsetting? :confused:
 
40.png
MooCowSteph:
I wonder what is was that was upsetting. How bizarre. It’s a beautiful picture that portrays the amazing advances in modern medicine, the love we have even for our unborn babies, and the beauty of life, no matter how small. That’s upsetting? :confused:
Click to expand...
Granted some people are squeamish…but SOME don’t want to be reminded about an un-born child… they might have to do something about it… like protecting it, etc, etc…! :rolleyes:
 
Dear Momofone:

I am not telling anyone here they should not feel compassion and sympathy for this “mother”

I’m just saying that I personally cannot muster up any sympathy whatsoever.

Anyone who can feel sorry for her…that’s very good. You’re a better person than I am.

Maybe it’s the way I was raised…I had parents who were very blunt with me (sometimes painfully so…)
When I did stupid things they told me…“that was really stupid”
When I acted like an idiot they told me…“don’t be an idiot”

And that’s how I feel about this.
It was stupid…she acted like a fool.
She knew exactly why she was there and what she was doing.
That it turned out the way it did was surprising? Why?

She went there to kill her baby…and that’s exactly what she got.
 
She went there to kill her baby…and that’s exactly what she got.
Click to expand...
I guess that is the unfortunate bottom line.

I suppose maybe she expected the workers at an abortion clinic to have more concern for her unborn child when it was actually alive? :confused: As idiotic as that may sound to us rational people , it may just be what she thought. They do pass themselves off as “caring”, “compassionate”, and concerned about “women’s rights”. I mean, the ads in my phone book for the abortion clinics say “quality treatment with respect”. :eek: How’s that for a load of garbage?
 
The baby was living proof that life is precious and miraculous, unborn or alive. It’s as though that clinic was trying to hide this so they could continue with this sinful and disgusting act.

I also emailed Sean Hannity.

God Bless You!
~Kerry
 
Abortion Advocate Backs Down on Repealing Pro-Life Law
by Steven Ertelt
LifeNews.com Editor
April 20*, 2005*

Washington, DC (LifeNews.com) – Abortion advocates in the Senate backed down on a planned effort to repeal a law that protects health care providers from being forced to perform or pay for abortions. A pro-abortion lawmaker said she would look to other ways to overturn the law.

http://www.lifenews.com/picdoctors.jpgContained in a spending bill signed by President Bush, the Hyde-Weldon provision says that the federal government can’t discriminate against doctors, hospitals or health insurance companies that do not want to perform or pay for abortions.

As a result, any federal, state or local agency that receives federal money would lose those funds if they engage in such discrimination.

Sen. Barbara Boxer, a California Democrat, had hoped to have a vote on a bill Thursday that would have repealed the provision.

Sensing defeat, Boxer withdrew the proposal and said she hopes courts will overturn the law or that she can put forward another proposal at a later date.

“I intend to continue working on this critical issue until it is resolved,” she said Thursday.

Douglas Johnson, the legislative director for the National Right to Life Committee told LifeNews.com, “Boxer saw she would lose by a few votes, so she made a face-saving retreat.”

Despite the victory, Johnson said the battle is not over.

“The battle will be rejoined later in the year when the time comes to renew the anti-discrimination law,” he said.

The Hyde-Weldon provision expires on September 30
 
The Hyde-Weldon provision expires on September 30, but pro-life lawmakers are expected to seek an extension of the law.

Senate Majority Leader Bill Frist had offered Boxer a vote to repeal the provision late last year. With Boxer declining, a spokesman for his office says Frist is under no obligation to allow her another chance.

“We consider our obligation fulfilled,” Bob Stevenson told the Associated Press.

Abortion advocates were gearing up for a vote and had send lobbying emails to grassroots advocates urging calls and emails to lawmakers.

“Thanks to the leadership and commitment of Sen. Boxer, you have a chance to overturn the law,” NARAL told its members. “Please take action in support of Boxer’s repeal today.”

Ted Miller, a spokesman for the group, told AP that NARAL was merely, “making sure that people were prepared if Sen. Boxer called for the vote.”

California Attorney General Bill Lockyer, in January, filed a lawsuit seeking to overturn it. The National Family Planning and Reproductive Health Association has filed another lawsuit and a federal judge held a hearing on that, also in January.

U.S. District Judge Henry Kennedy made no decision in the case after hearing arguments from both sides about the implications of the new law.

Pro-life groups say the Hyde-Weldon law is necessary because abortion advocates have been attacking medical agencies and professionals who don’t want to be involved in abortion.
 
Wait a minute! Are they trying to change the law to say that I HAVE to assist in baby-killing? Even though it goes against God’s laws and my conscience? Are they trying to ursurp MY RIGHT TO CHOOSE???
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top