People tell us: “I’m personally opposed to abortion, but I think it should be legal.”
Perhaps the notable version of that comes from Roman Catholics abortion choicers: They insist they believe “what Catholics believe” on abortion, but don’t want to force their beliefs on others.
The usual pro-life response is to argue the substance of abortion: Are the preborn human beings with the right not to be killed? If so, should the government defend their rights along with everyone else’s?
Such a response can sometimes produce a profitable discussion, but it misses another point: What do people mean when they say they’re “personally opposed” but claim there is a “right” to abortion that must be protected by law?
Many pro-lifers will immediately answer that such people aren’t really opposed to abortion. That may well be true. But what if we accepted their words just as they gave them?
In fact, people paint themselves into a corner by saying they agree with what “Catholics” believe. The Church teaches that the preborn are persons, they have rights. If we take the words of such “personally opposed” people at face value, then, they are saying something quite different from merely disagreeing with that Church position. **What their words have said is that they believe the fetus is a person with rights, and they believe it should be legal for the mother to have that person killed just because she chooses to.
…**