A
Abrosz
Guest
Do you mean coitus interruptus?Natural family planning has been around since the beginning it seems.
Do you mean coitus interruptus?Natural family planning has been around since the beginning it seems.
Oh I’m sure there are lots of views. There’s a whole ethical system that says it’s A-OK to splash women in the face with acid as punishment for leaving the home unaccompanied. Another ethical system says it’s OK for a cop to crush a black man’s neck with his boot.In which ethical system? There are quite a few.
Sadly, murder is not only the realm of psychopaths.Oh, I was not aware that we are surrounded by bloodthirsty psychopaths who only care about themselves. Reality check, anyone?
So they will have an abortion, but can’t find or use birth control. That kind of dissonance hardly makes sense.The practical methods are common birth control methods.
This is good advice. I don’t understand why someone would trust so blindly when partaking in something that they consider risky.My general (secular) advice for women is to vet men/be extremely selective. Why sleep with someone who doesn’t want to love and commit?
Obviously s/he is not.OP, just out of curiosity, are you Catholic?
This would only be obvious to me had I read through this thread, which I have not.Obviously not.
People use each other. But as Christians we’re called to be better than that. People deserve more than to be treated like a means to an end. Even if they agree to it.And while I am “using” them, they also 'use" me. As long as we agree, there is no problem.
Nobody is saying contraception is worse than murder. Don’t be ridiculous.And you still say that ABC is worse. I don’t understand.
You ignored the analogy. You’re talking to a specific group of people with a certain set of values. Would you allow people to assault someone instead of killing them, if it reduces murder? Or would you say both are wrong? You’re asking people who believe in openness to life, without even looking at that belief. You’re missing several steps.And still it could prevent abortions. Which one is more important?
I suspect it will be your firm position that all Solutions to minimize abortions - and which do not themselves entail acts contrary to catholic moral tenets - are impractical.What kind of PRACTICAL solution can you offer to minimize / eliminate abortions?
The thing is, people are never going to want to stop abortion right now. It’s always about the women’s body and it’s “her right” to decide whether she keeps the baby or not. Personally I think Abortions are ruthless, destructive, heartless and sinfull. let us pray for the baby’s being aborted from this life.What kind of PRACTICAL solution can you offer to minimize / eliminate abortions?
I’m a lawyer too and I used to make this distinction.My Father is a lawyer. In his lawyers mind Abortion should be Legal.
In his personal and Fatherly mind abortions should not be so.
So glad you made this point. I’ve never understood the logic behind the legal thinking. From a male perspective the baby is a “fetus”, which has no rights, and can be aborted (only by the mother). Males have no say on the issue. However if she decides to keep the ”fetus” then the male then has responsibility for child support at a later date. So it’s her body with her total control, then it both parties’ after a certain time period?Redefining the baby as a “fetus” who isn’t a true person in order to get around this is not only legal gamesmanship/ a cowardly move, but also a bit frightening; if the fetus is not a person and has no rights, then the state, or its father who would have to pay child support, should be able to kill it as easily as the mother, which obviously are not desirable outcomes.