B
Bruno_Schulz
Guest
Yes, of course must the convincement of these precise words to history be accepted and honoured. No doubt about that.
However; knowing there where not two histories – a biblical and a historic one, but the one and only we all had, we still should trust both; the scientifically proven and the biblical one. So, one or the other story is bound to be allegory, just as one or the other scientifically proven, is absolutely wrong. Hardly anyone would insist, the world had been created within 7 Days, as there was no day before sun and universe was created. A “day” the Genesis describes, might well be a million years, just as well as a second. What’s a day in heaven anyway? Jesus Himself told us parables or similes. because we simply wouldn’t understand otherwise.
Though I consider myself a totally convinced Catholic, I consider such details and the supposition of Genesis in a literal manner, as a „not necessary postulate“ for living in the word of God. Knowing it was the pre Stone-Age we are talking about, and the oldest town we know of was Jericho – on the other hand not knowing what in pre-Jericho-days was called a town (might be some huts?), I dare to doubt the very word and rather take it as RIGHT HONORABLE TRUE SYMBOL. Much of our language would to an alien be a lie (take “it rained cats and dogs”) but we all understand rightly. Furthermore it was not common to have just one wife, but many (so even described in the bible) and it is believed that there rather was a matriarchy, where things look a little different.
But what use is it to argue about a thing or time, we know so little about, and we will see anyhow one day.
It doesn’t change a single thing in our trust in God; in our real believe in God, nor in our relationship to God. That’s why I would not consider suchlike questions as really important. We’d never argue about the Holy Trinity, because we won’t ever understand it. Still we believe in it of course. Alike I’d never argue about Genesis, and rather accept in a very respecting way, anyone’s point of view, for I don’t think it matters to our relationship to God, who’s right.
However; knowing there where not two histories – a biblical and a historic one, but the one and only we all had, we still should trust both; the scientifically proven and the biblical one. So, one or the other story is bound to be allegory, just as one or the other scientifically proven, is absolutely wrong. Hardly anyone would insist, the world had been created within 7 Days, as there was no day before sun and universe was created. A “day” the Genesis describes, might well be a million years, just as well as a second. What’s a day in heaven anyway? Jesus Himself told us parables or similes. because we simply wouldn’t understand otherwise.
Though I consider myself a totally convinced Catholic, I consider such details and the supposition of Genesis in a literal manner, as a „not necessary postulate“ for living in the word of God. Knowing it was the pre Stone-Age we are talking about, and the oldest town we know of was Jericho – on the other hand not knowing what in pre-Jericho-days was called a town (might be some huts?), I dare to doubt the very word and rather take it as RIGHT HONORABLE TRUE SYMBOL. Much of our language would to an alien be a lie (take “it rained cats and dogs”) but we all understand rightly. Furthermore it was not common to have just one wife, but many (so even described in the bible) and it is believed that there rather was a matriarchy, where things look a little different.
But what use is it to argue about a thing or time, we know so little about, and we will see anyhow one day.
It doesn’t change a single thing in our trust in God; in our real believe in God, nor in our relationship to God. That’s why I would not consider suchlike questions as really important. We’d never argue about the Holy Trinity, because we won’t ever understand it. Still we believe in it of course. Alike I’d never argue about Genesis, and rather accept in a very respecting way, anyone’s point of view, for I don’t think it matters to our relationship to God, who’s right.