Boy, you go away for a day, and you have a hundred posts to read.
Maybe an analogy will help. Why not teach homosexuality as an alternative lifestyle to heterosexuality? After all, they’re both just lifestyles; there’s no reason to teach one lifestyle without talking about all of them as equally valid, right? Wrong - this is moral relativism. The truth is that there are moral absolutes - some things are right and some things are wrong.
Well, teaching any random idea that someone comes up with as an equally valid “scientific” theory alongside evolution is just scientific relativism, and it is just as wrong as moral relativism. In science, there are scientific absolutes, right and wrong answers.
Now, because of how God set up the universe, the scientific method may lead to all sorts of incorrect conclusions, but nobody will know for sure until we get to heaven. But in the meantime, there is an academic displine called science, and it uses the scientific method exclusively. The application of that method has lead to great advances in our country, and I would hate to see China become the world’s scientific leader because we are unable to teach the subject of science in America.