False dichotomy. Yes, you are using extremes to prove your point but, in order for that to be valid, they have to be reasonably possible.
- We have very few orphanages around and those that do exist primarily house children who are not eligible for adoption. They are long term foster care.
- Christ loving women wouldn’t be involved in a same-sex relationship.
- The orphanages that do exist are heavily regulated, much more so than private homes. It is much more likely that an adoptive couple would be a bad placement than that an orphanage would have “terrible” conditions.
The Church speaks authoritatively against same-sex couples adopting and compares that to child abuse. That being said, I doubt any Church official would stand in the way of an adoption to a same-sex couple,** if that were truly the only option** other than institutional abuse or if one of the people was the last blood relative that could raise the child. But those are extreme and rare situations. Once you make legal accommodations for same-sex couples to adopt, they aren’t saving children from terrible institutions. They are keeping those children from being adopted into normal families with mothers and fathers.