Indeed. If anything, the increased standardization of EF …" reflects a certain “Novus Ordoization” of the old rite
I agree with you. We’ve discussed it many times, and so you know my strong support and preference for the EF. That said, the “regularity” that people recall about the old mass seems often to be a conflation of a couple of ideas. First, the “tone” of the mass was regular, especially the low masses, which were the overwhelming majority of masses. High mass in the parish my family belonged to occurred only a few times a year, and was a big event.
Second, the mental attitude of the worshipper was “regular”. Since little was demanded, other than presence, mass was accompanied by a steadiness of approach, much in the way someone has a steadiness over any routine tasks. The people who prayed the rosary during mass probably almost always prayed it, the people who prayed for the dead, or for their children, probably always prayed for them, and so on. The ability to “get in a groove” is probably what created the strongest impression of “regularity.” If someone did not know whether to stand or kneel, it did not really matter back then.
So, yes, you raise a good point in observing that V2 has had a profound impact even on traditionalist practice. In a way, I’m probably a good example. My great grandfather lived and died in the Church. He accepted its teachings as readily as he accepted the laws of supply and demand, the government’s decision to go to war, and the facts that horses must be well fed and groomed if they are to pull heavy wagons. As far as I know, he never set foot in a church of any other denomination. This forum, however, would have perplexed him, and he would have said to me,“If you want to discuss religion, be a priest.”
It will be a long, long time before we, or even the SSPX, have a Church full of men like that again.