Al Qaeda-affiliated terror group recruitment video purportedly features Trump

[Sy_Noe]

This level of prescience is nothing special. Everyone knew from the first moment Trump made his statement that it would be excellent ISIS recruitment material.

Even his supporters? Yet they still applaud and are cheerleaders for the guy?

 

[GaryTaylor]

FOX shows bias to the right. If that is the bias you prefer that is fine- just be honest about it.

I prefer numerous sources which you see in my posting. But its good all agree they are all bias and that the OP chose FOX to argue against a FOX point?

 

[GaryTaylor]

Even his supporters? Yet they still applaud and are cheerleaders for the guy?

Like the left with Bill the fornicator and Hillary who STILL covers up and lies?

 

[GaryTaylor]

Originally Posted by ringil View Post
If that is the bias you prefer that is fine- just be honest about it.

Bill the fornicator and Hillary the liar? There you go, do tell. And the bias Fox makes your point how in the OP? I’d love to hear the story? Wait by being honest about Bill and Hillary?

 

[Robert_Bay]

MODERATOR NOTICE

Please keep the charity rules of the forums even if candidates call others names, members should not do likewise.

Thank you for your cooperation.

 

[Path_Finder]

How is it more dangerous than dropping bombs on ISIS?

Don’t you think that angers them more than our immigration policies?

Absolutely, the coalition has hit leaders, supported the Kurdish and other forces whereas ISIS has lost land.

A report came out in the last few days, that ISIS has lost 10% of their occupied land in 2015; while this may not be great, it is something especially since some of that land is likely just plain desert.

Of course, this is slightly different in the original post, it is Al Qaeda but as if they would be changing their opinions of us so that we would have to be apologetic to them.

 

[Jon_S_1]

Dropping bombs on ISIS (and only on ISIS) does not anger those who are not in ISIS at all. But showing the world that we think all Muslims are a threat angers those very people who could be our most effective allies.

Angers them to the point of joining ISIS and trying to kill us??? Really our immigration policy does that?

You don’t think to highly of Muslims do you?

 

[Darryl1958]

Angers them to the point of joining ISIS and trying to kill us??? Really our immigration policy does that?

You don’t think to highly of Muslims do you?

It is the same opinion of Muslims that Hillary Clinton brings to the table, who is of the opinion that Muslims are walking time bombs ready to go off at a moments notice.

Trump is of the opinion that the small percentage of Muslims who are of that ilk are something that a rational immigration policy could vet for.

Therein lies the difference between left wing bigotry and Trump.

 

[LeafByNiggle]

It is the same opinion of Muslims that Hillary Clinton brings to the table, who is of the opinion that Muslims are walking time bombs ready to go off at a moments notice.

Trump is of the opinion that the small percentage of Muslims who are of that ilk are something that a rational immigration policy could vet for.

Therein lies the difference between left wing bigotry and Trump.

Of course you have it exactly backwards. Clinton does not want even a small percentage of Muslims to be radicalized, and she recognizes, as does everyone else, that comments implying Muslims are not welcome here serve the purpose of those who recruit for ISIS. On the other hand, it is Trump’s position that treats all Muslims as posing the same threat.

 

[Darryl1958]

Of course you have it exactly backwards. Clinton does not want even a small percentage of Muslims to be radicalized, and she recognizes, as does everyone else, that comments implying Muslims are not welcome here serve the purpose of those who recruit for ISIS. On the other hand, it is Trump’s position that treats all Muslims as posing the same threat.

On the contrary, I nailed it.
Clinton is an appeaser who thinks that suppressing American freedoms will somehow placate the Muslim hordes. Her appeal is to Americans who think the same.
That is how left wing bigotry works. It is the bigotry of low expectations that believes that even a silly internet video is enough to spin the hordes into a ulelating frenzy of fanaticism.

Trump calls for a moratorium until a proper vetting process is instituted, which means that he understands the numbers of Muslims who are capable of being radicalized is low enough that vetting is possible.

 

[7_Sorrows]

Here’s what they should know about us:

1. unlike Muslim dominated countries, people here may exercise religious liberty ( unless you oppose the HHS Mandate ). Muslims are welcome to do do, as well
   2). That said, we are historically a western judeo-Christian country. Our laws and constitution reflect that culture. We are not, under any circumstance, open to the idea of sharia. It’s a non- negotiable.
2. we wish Muslim dominated countries a peaceful existence, but we also steadfastly will defend Israel’s right to for the same. We also defend their current borders until their neighbors recognize and defend their right to exist.
3. we demand that Christians and followers of other faiths be secure in the right to exercise their faith in Muslim dominated countries. That Muslims be permitted to act on their faith, even if that means a change in faith

Jon

 

[Darryl1958]

My question is why should we care? What our enemies think of what our presidential candidates say, or what our citizens say, for that matter, shouldn’t influence policy or place limits on our speech rights.
My point is Hillary may try to use this to suppress opposition speech (that’s what progressives believe in, after all ) but she should be completely ignored on the point. In fact, she should be challenged on why she wants to limit speech against these terrorist groups, why she’s trying to protect them.

Jon

The press is selectively gleeful on who the Islamists use for recruiting purposes.
They also use the Black Lives Matter movement, to prove that America is a racist country.
Likewise Noam Chomsky has been a popular voice in their recruitment drives, as has Michaell Moore figured in as a cheerleader for the Islamist cause.

The anti-American rhetoric of the left is a prime recruiting tool for the Islamists.
When can we expect the lefties to stifle themselves on that account?

 

[Sy_Noe]

I prefer numerous sources which you see in my posting. But its good all agree they are all bias and that the OP chose FOX to argue against a FOX point?

The OP could have chosen CNN etc but only chose FOX because it seems to be one of the most popular sources here. CNN etc could have reported the same story but would have been more likely to be written off as part of the liberal MSM. So the OP only chose FOX to pacify the masses here in this case.

 

[GaryTaylor]

The OP could have chosen CNN etc but only chose FOX because it seems to be one of the most popular sources here. CNN etc could have reported the same story but would have been more likely to be written off as part of the liberal MSM. So the OP only chose FOX to pacify the masses here in this case.

So theres no difference in either source how is that bias if you could have chose either? Seems to me the chant is a MB tactic called “tolerance” surely all are willing to have the same tolerance they demand? Or when not in agreement the chant is bias, hate and no tolerance? I think we all heard the story for a few years now. Oh wait MSN CNN and Obama are the arbiters of tolerance in the pc world? Our par excellence of tolerance?

 

[GaryTaylor]

The anti-American rhetoric of the left is a prime recruiting tool for the Islamists.
When can we expect the lefties to stifle themselves on that account?

I think in some fashion they have, perhaps a good deal of us. You know part of the issue in the overall concept of the radicals is its so incredible that a good deal of people just blow it off as preposterous and fantasy etc. The problem is it doesn’t matter what we think, what matters is what they think. And yes that radical reality is hard to deny as we see it morph. which is part of the stifle now.