Alec Baldwin Calls Daughter a 'Rude, Thoughtless Pig'

  • Thread starter Thread starter rayne89
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
I heard on the radio that the mom didn’t leak the tape. It was part of their custody case that was part of the public record. The judge didn’t seal it.

If that is true, then Kim Bassinger is getting a bum rap.
 
Alec Baldwin is another leftist pro-abortion slimy puke. Hopefully, he goes the way of Rosie and gets the boot off the airwaves and the big screen.
 
I heard on the radio that the mom didn’t leak the tape. It was part of their custody case that was part of the public record. The judge didn’t seal it.

If that is true, then Kim Bassinger is getting a bum rap.
Well that may be true. But as far as I know all family court cases are sealed to the public.
 
The only 'pig’ in this interchange between Baldwin and his daughter’s voice mail is Alec Baldwin.
 
The only 'pig’ in this interchange between Baldwin and his daughter’s voice mail is Alec Baldwin.
😃 Got to watch out when pointing out a flaw when you have three fingers pointing back. While his dughter may or may not be, (I have nothing to say one way or the other I’ll just give the benifit of the doubt and say not) the only one who looks that way is him.
 
I heard on the radio that the mom didn’t leak the tape. It was part of their custody case that was part of the public record. The judge didn’t seal it.

If that is true, then Kim Bassinger is getting a bum rap.
It’s only the tip of the iceburg, but I’d just say they’d be better off if they quit being so bitter and ‘quit digging up old bones.’
 
Update:
I heard on the radio this morning that Alec attempted to get out of his contract with ABC (for 30 rock) in order to “attend to legal issues of parental alienation” and he was denied.
Looks like they are not going to let him take any time off to deal with this.
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jerome42
The only ‘pig’ in this interchange between Baldwin and his daughter’s voice mail is Alec Baldwin
😃 Got to watch out when pointing out a flaw when you have three fingers pointing back. While his dughter may or may not be, (I have nothing to say one way or the other I’ll just give the benifit of the doubt and say not) the only one who looks that way is him.
Definitely a kinder way of saying the same thing, however since I am a father of five who has never used such demeaning language,I feel I can be more critical.

We have to stop thinking of children as mere possessions rather than gifts from God. Remember what Our Lord said about those who would harm those little ones He thought so much of:

Mark 9,42

“Whoever causes one of these little ones who believe (in me) to sin, it would be better for him if a great millstone were put around his neck and he were thrown into the sea”
 
I do not know whether there is a question of ‘leaking’. I do not know if the child, or her mother, attempted to speak to Mr. Baldwin about this and were, perhaps, even more thoroughly castigated.

But. . .I do know, from bitter experience, that no matter how hard one tries to maintain at least neutral relations in a divorce, no matter how hard one tries to shield the children from ill effects, if there is genuine abuse on the part of one or both parents, then it is more corrosive not to address the abuse.

How often did I attempt to explain away the hateful remarks and actions as “your father cares about you and even if the way he shows it might not be the way you or I would like or choose, he is still your father and worthy of respect on that account.” I did this thousands of times through the course of a very abusive marriage and separation, trying to ‘explain’ away abuse as ‘caring’.

But I was wrong to do so. Oh, I wasn’t wrong in trying to keep civil, or in my judgment that their father was their father and for them to respect him as their father.

But I was wrong in allowing them to get the idea that somehow, because this was ‘his way’ of caring, to abuse, that this way was ‘all right’. That wasn’t what I meant to get across as a message, but that was what they took from it. . .that this sort of screaming, rage, and worse was ‘caring’. It has taken years of therapy for us to understand that it wasn’t ‘all right’ or ‘caring’ and that there can really be no ‘glossing over’ of abuse under the guise of ‘caring’.

Perhaps Ms. Bassinger had tried to convey to her daughter all of the above and more. . .perhaps Mr. Baldwin, like my ex, is still convinced that he can literally say or do whatever he pleases as if he were a god. Perhaps there was no other way for this child to have the traumatic experience properly addressed. Yes, it is awful to have this ‘out in public’. . .but it is even worse to have it eating like acid into your soul ‘in private’ with no one to take your part or to let you know, in no uncertain terms, that this type of behavior is not only wrong, but that just because somebody ‘names’ you by a label, that does not mean that you must be, or accept, that label.
 
I do not know whether there is a question of ‘leaking’. I do not know if the child, or her mother, attempted to speak to Mr. Baldwin about this and were, perhaps, even more thoroughly castigated.

But. . .I do know, from bitter experience, that no matter how hard one tries to maintain at least neutral relations in a divorce, no matter how hard one tries to shield the children from ill effects, if there is genuine abuse on the part of one or both parents, then it is more corrosive not to address the abuse.

How often did I attempt to explain away the hateful remarks and actions as “your father cares about you and even if the way he shows it might not be the way you or I would like or choose, he is still your father and worthy of respect on that account.” I did this thousands of times through the course of a very abusive marriage and separation, trying to ‘explain’ away abuse as ‘caring’.

But I was wrong to do so. Oh, I wasn’t wrong in trying to keep civil, or in my judgment that their father was their father and for them to respect him as their father.

But I was wrong in allowing them to get the idea that somehow, because this was ‘his way’ of caring, to abuse, that this way was ‘all right’. That wasn’t what I meant to get across as a message, but that was what they took from it. . .that this sort of screaming, rage, and worse was ‘caring’. It has taken years of therapy for us to understand that it wasn’t ‘all right’ or ‘caring’ and that there can really be no ‘glossing over’ of abuse under the guise of ‘caring’.

Perhaps Ms. Bassinger had tried to convey to her daughter all of the above and more. . .perhaps Mr. Baldwin, like my ex, is still convinced that he can literally say or do whatever he pleases as if he were a god. Perhaps there was no other way for this child to have the traumatic experience properly addressed. Yes, it is awful to have this ‘out in public’. . .but it is even worse to have it eating like acid into your soul ‘in private’ with no one to take your part or to let you know, in no uncertain terms, that this type of behavior is not only wrong, but that just because somebody ‘names’ you by a label, that does not mean that you must be, or accept, that label.
We can now see why, in the Church’s Wisdon, divorce has never been an option. It opens up a can of worms we are not prepared to handle.
 
We can now see why, in the Church’s Wisdon, divorce has never been an option. It opens up a can of worms we are not prepared to handle.
You better be very precise, and add, if there is any abuse that causes danger there should be a seperation. At the same time both really ought to go in with a good idea of what role you need to play and put a good faith effort.
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jerome42
We can now see why, in the Church’s Wisdon, divorce has never been an option. It opens up a can of worms we are not prepared to handle
You better be very precise, and add, if there is any abuse that causes danger there should be a seperation. At the same time both really ought to go in with a good idea of what role you need to play and put a good faith effort.
I think that goes without saying.

Unfortunately in this day and age those with opposing views to the truth immediately try and cite some remote situation where they’d want an exception made, e.g. abortion is OK in the case of incest, or a marriage should be disolved in cases of physical cruelty. Like you say there are things in place such as Church approved separations to deal with some of these issues. People try to get off the hook if they are told that they cannot do something. The biggest deception right now is 'a woman’s right to choose issue.

In God’s eyes human life is sacred and vows of marriage are intended to be a life long commitment. This is the way it is.
 
I have read mostly everyone’s comments. But did anyone mention that when people are recorded, or know they will be recorded, they are alot more reserved? What is this guy like when the voice recording is off?
 
I have read mostly everyone’s comments. But did anyone mention that when people are recorded, or know they will be recorded, they are alot more reserved? What is this guy like when the voice recording is off?
I don’t know if he realized he was being recorded, even if it was an answering machine. People in anger don’t always put 2+2 together. Even if you give the benefit of the doubt and taking his side that it’s a condition created by separation anxiety or what ever he’s calling it, he is not really in any condition to be seeing his child until he can get that anger under control. I’m still a bit with you, I’m guessing it’s just a tip of the iceberg. But if the judge temporarily halted visitation, I would be hard pressed to think that was a bad judgement.
 
If only more people were as concerned about the way they treat their own kids as they are concerned about the way a total stranger treats his.

– Mark L. Chance.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top