All revealed religions are from one source God Allah YHWH and hence truthful in the origin

  • Thread starter Thread starter paarsurrey
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
Hi

Muhammad never taught that Jesus was the greatest of all the Messengers. Even Moses had a higher status than Jesus. Jesus was only a subordinate-reformer of Moses in Judaism.

Thanks
no offense but between you and Joseph Belloc, a noted historian, who do you think will i believe?:confused:
God bless.
 
Hi

Muhammad never taught that Jesus was the greatest of all the Messengers. Even Moses had a higher status than Jesus. Jesus was only a subordinate-reformer of Moses in Judaism.

Thanks
It seems to me that you have to decide a few things for yourself first. Once you do, you will have a straighter path.
First, do you desire truth with all your heart?
Second, are you willing to OBEY the truth when God shows it to you? Many people say they are seeking God or have found Him, but they really only seek a god who will cut a deal with them and let them live life the way they want to. Those people will not find the God who created the universe.
Next, you have to ask yourself how you will determine what is a worthy authority for you to listen to. Christians believe the RESURRECTED and HISTORICAL Christ who was predicted in minute detail over a period of 1500 years by many biblical authors is THE worthy Authority.

What do you think about these matters?
 
Hi

I think you should study Quran ,again and again, for the fullfilled prophecies.

I love Jesus mentioned in Quran.

Thanks
I have - there is no prophecies in the Quran. One of the tenets of Islam is that Muhammad is a messenger, not a prophet.
 
I love Jesus like I love Krishna.

What you’re saying is you love Jesus like you love Satan (which is all Krishna is).
 
forums.catholic-questions.org/showpost.php?p=4745514&postcount=130

Hi

All revealed religions are from one source God Allah YHWH and hence truthful in its origin.

Hindus claim that their religious books mention of Jesus 3000 years prior to Jesus actual coming to India, after surving death on Cross.

What does that prove?

It proves, in my opinion, that originally their books were truthful. It is another matter that they lost the guidance later like Christians, who lost guidance from God Allah YHWH when they started following Paul and Church instead of Jesus.

I love Jesus like I love Krishna.

Thanks
Off course all religions claim to be originated from God. Name any religion which claim itself not from God? Come on, be reasonable, my dear brother.
 
Hi

I think Judaism was revealed on Moses. Don’t you agree with me?
It is the oldest among Abrahamic Religions ie Judaism, Christianity and Islam. It is yet another thing that GodAllahYHWH took no guarantee for the security of its book Torah and they lost or they got corrupted its book. Even the ten Commandment on the plates were broken and are not to be found anywhere. Had this not happened; perhaps there would have not been any Christianity? Jesus came only to revive Moses’ religion. But that does not mean that Judaism was not truthful in its origin. Moses was a truthful Messenger and Torah was truthful in its origin.

I think you agree with me.

Thanks
Now you are jumping all over the place. Again.

Simple questions. Was Judaism a revealed faith? Yes, it was.

Is it the oldest revealed faith? That is one that I am waiting for you to answer
 
I love Jesus like I love Krishna.

Yes. The Jesus you say you love does not exist. It is another Jesus. ________

What you’re saying is you love Jesus like you love Satan (which is all Krishna is).
 
Hi

I think Judaism was revealed on Moses. Don’t you agree with me?
It is the oldest among Abrahamic Religions ie Judaism, Christianity and Islam. It is yet another thing that GodAllahYHWH took no guarantee for the security of its book Torah and they lost or they got corrupted its book. Even the ten Commandment on the plates were broken and are not to be found anywhere. Had this not happened; perhaps there would have not been any Christianity? Jesus came only to revive Moses’ religion. But that does not mean that Judaism was not truthful in its origin. Moses was a truthful Messenger and Torah was truthful in its origin.

I think you agree with me.

Thanks
i have nothing to say to this but LOLLLLLLLLLLL.

absolutely ridiculous.
 
Mohammedanism drew its strength from the true Catholic doctrines which it retained: the equality of all men before God-“All true believers are brothers.”
“The equality of all men before God” is not the same as saying, “All true believers are brothers.”

“All true believers are brothers” implies that unbelievers are not equal before God and can be treated as less, which Islam does.
It zealously preached and throve on the paramount claims of justice, social and economic.
Do you have proof of this?

P.S. Why is it necessary to imbed so many commands in your posts? It makes it difficult to reply.
 
paarsurrey,

Jesus did not physically travel to India. His Apostle Thomas traveled to India, and spread the Gospel to the people there. Jesus died on mount Calvary/Golgotha on the cross, and rose again on the third day, and ascended into heaven forty days later. Jesus did not escape death on the cross, because He willingly chose to lay down His life. He then overcame death by resurrecting from the dead.

I love Jesus who sent His Apostles to the world and far off nations to convert them with the Gospel, the true message of God, the message of repentance, faith, and baptism.

And he said to them, "Go into all the world and preach the gospel to the whole creation. He who believes and is baptized will be saved; but he who does not believe will be condemned (Mark 16:15-16).

God bless,

Rony
paarsurrey,please read this again its the truth and the truth will set you free and jesus did not live to the age of 123 years old

Jesus did not physically travel to India. His Apostle Thomas traveled to India, and spread the Gospel to the people there. Jesus died on mount Calvary/Golgotha on the cross, and rose again on the third day, and ascended into heaven forty days later. Jesus did not escape death on the cross, because He willingly chose to lay down His life. He then overcame death by resurrecting from the dead.
 
Hi

Muhammad never taught that Jesus was the greatest of all the Messengers. Even Moses had a higher status than Jesus. Jesus was only a subordinate-reformer of Moses in Judaism.

Thanks
Oh yes, he did. He mentioned Jesus as Khalimatullah, the word of God. Any other person mentioned in Quran bearing the same title?
 
Hi

It was a must for Jesus to travel to India, in my opinion, to spread the Gospel in 10 tribes settled there. He had prophesized destruction of Jerusalem if an attempt to kill him was made, so he could not remain there, he had to migrate:

**On the evidence from books of history
which show that the coming of Jesus to
the Punjab and neighbouring territories was inevitable **

The question naturally arises, why Jesus after his escape from the Cross, came to this country what induced him to take such a long journey? It becomes necessary to answer this question in some detail. I have already said something about it, nevertheless, I think it would be helpful to set out the entire topic in this book.

Let it be noted, therefore, that it was extremely necessary, by reasons of his office as a divine messenger, for Jesus (on whom be peace) to have journeyed towards the Punjab and its neighbourhood, for the ten tribes of Israel, who in the Gospels have been called the Lost Sheep of Israel, had migrated to this country, a fact which is not denied by an historian. It was necessary, therefore, that Jesus (on whom be peace) should have journeyed to this country and, after finding the Lost Sheep, he should have conveyed to them his divine message.

If he had not done so, his purpose would have remained unfulfilled, for his mission was to preach to the Lost Sheep of Israel; his passing away from the world without seeking these lost sheep and, after finding them, teaching them the way to salvation, would have been like the case of a man who had been charged by his king to go to a wild tribe in order to dig a well and supply them with water, but who goes instead to some other place, spends three or four years there and takes no steps to search for the tribe. Does such a man carry out the command of the king? No, not in the least; the man cares not for that tribe: he merely looks to his own comfort.

If, however, it is asked, how and why it should be supposed that the ten tribes of Israel came to this country, the reply is that there is clear evidence to that effect, about which even a person of a poor intellect can have no doubt; for it is well known that people like the Afghans and the original inhabitants of Kashmir are of Israelite origin.

For example, the people of the hilly tract of Alai which is two or three days’ journey from the district of Hazara, have called themselves Bani Israel from time immemorial; so, also the inhabitants of the Kala Dakah, another hilly tract in this region, take pride in being of Israelite origin. Then there is a tribe in the Hazara district itself which attributes their origin to Israel.

Similarly, the people of the hilly region between Chalas and Kabul call themselves Israelites. About the people of Kashmir, the view expressed by Dr. Bernier on the authority of some English scholars, in the second part of his book Travels in the Moghul Empire,17 is well founded: the view, namely, that the Kashmiri people are the descendants of Israel; their dress, their features and some of their customs conclusively point to the fact that they are of Israelite origin.

An Englishman, George Forster by name, states in his book18 that during his stay in Kashmir he thought himself to be amidst a tribe of the Jews. In the book called The Races of Afghanistan,19 by H. W. Bellews C.S.I., (Thacker Spink & Co., Calcutta) it is mentioned that the Afghans came from Syria. Nebuchadnezzar took them prisoner and settled them in Persia and Media, from whence at some later time they marched to the East and settled in the Ghaur hills, where they were known as Beni Israel.

In proof of this there is the prophecy of the Prophet Idris (Enoch), saying that the ten tribes of Israel who were taken prisoner escaped from bondage and took refuge in the territory called Arsartat which appears to be the name of the part known as Hazara today, part of the region being called Ghaur.

alislam.org/library/books/jesus-in-india/ch4.html

I love Jesus who travelled so much to spread the Gospel to comlete the mission assigned to him by GodAllahYHWH into so far off lands

Thanks
Forget it. None of that is in Quran. Even your ProphetMessenger changed his idea twice about the tomb of Jesus. First in Galilee, next in Syria, later in Khasmir, I wonder what next if he is still alive.
 
“The equality of all men before God” is not the same as saying, “All true believers are brothers.”

“All true believers are brothers” implies that unbelievers are not equal before God and can be treated as less, which Islam does.

Do you have proof of this?

P.S. Why is it necessary to imbed so many commands in your posts? It makes it difficult to reply.
you’ll find the full article in ewtn.org and search for “great heresies”.👍
God bless
 
Oh yes, he did. He mentioned Jesus as Khalimatullah, the word of God. Any other person mentioned in Quran bearing the same title?
Hi

You are mistaken. Quran mentions that there are innumerable words of God, and if Jesus is one among them that does not make him any superior to others.

I love Jesus

Thanks
 
forums.catholic-questions.org/showpost.php?p=4745514&postcount=130

Hi

All revealed religions are from one source God Allah YHWH and hence truthful in its origin.

Hindus claim that their religious books mention of Jesus 3000 years prior to Jesus actual coming to India, after surving death on Cross.

What does that prove?

It proves, in my opinion, that originally their books were truthful. It is another matter that they lost the guidance later like Christians, who lost guidance from God Allah YHWH when they started following Paul and Church instead of Jesus.

I love Jesus like I love Krishna.

Thanks
One thing I’ll say about the Hindu chappies is they’ve never invaded another country for holy war.
You can say what you like about Allah, Krishna, etc, that’s perception for you.
I know this is difficult to accept, and truth often is, but all religions are not equal, and you are free & welcome to question the majesty of Catholicism, but (and I say this with respect) save yourself the indignity of making sweeping judgemental statements like ‘Christians lost guidance when they started following Paul and Church instead of Jesus’. I’m sure you’ve researched earnestly, and I’d like to ask that you continue your research looking at Catholic resources so that at the very least, you get a balanced picture of the history. There’s nothing worse than ignorance - that applies to me, you, & everybody.
 
“The equality of all men before God” is not the same as saying, “All true believers are brothers.”

“All true believers are brothers” implies that unbelievers are not equal before God and can be treated as less, which Islam does.
As long as you believe in Jesus and God, you are some kind of a believer. You are not a disbeliever even though you do not believe in Muhammad. You be a good christian, that is good enough for you.
Do you have proof of this?
P.S. Why is it necessary to imbed so many commands in your posts? It makes it difficult to reply.
No comment.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top