Altar Calls are

  • Thread starter Thread starter CopticChristian
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
Deacon Lapey,
You keep writing about the “current Catholic understanding.” Can you help us understand exactly what the current Catholic understanding is, when did this come about and by what authority it became the current teaching or understanding? As a bonus question, what was the understanding before this “current understanding” came to be?
I merely mean that transubstantiation is relatively new. Yes I’m aware you can find patristic support which sounds a lot like it which I’m fine with, there is also patristic support that clearly expresses another alternate views. I’ve been told by many a poster it’s all part of the ‘development of doctrine’, so currently it’s expressed with this terminology.

Regards

Lincs
 
Sure you aren’t reading your own biases here? If Luther really believed that God supernaturally made present the body and blood of Christ at the Eucharist, the lamb of God who takes away our sins, then at that point there is no rational basis to NOT seeing the mass as participation in the sacrificial offering of Christ at Calvary.

If the Eucharist IS the body and blood of Christ, then it IS the lamb of God who takes away our sins, by definition. And that lamb of God IS the sacrifice that atones for all human sinfulness. How you can tack on the caveat at the end “but it’s not a sacrifice” I have no comprehension.

Perhaps you mean to say that there can never be ANOTHER sacrifice. Catholics agree. We don’t sacrifice Christ over and over again. Each mass is supernaturally joined to Calvary. You fixate on the “once” part, we read on to the “for all” part. Celebrating mass is participating in the “for all” part of that Hebrews passage. Hope that clarifies things. Christ offering himself for us at Calvary is the focal point of time and space, his sacrificial presence radiates out from there to all of time and space. Remember, time is not a constraint to God.
I’m not reading biases into Luther… There is a summary of his views on the mass available here: mtio.com/articles/bissar92.htm

Regards

Lincs.
 
Thanks for the link, I didn’t mean to doubt you, but this IS the internet, after all. Trust, but verify… 😉

Trying to follow Luther logic makes my brain hurt. 😊
 
Altar Calls for Lutherans is when we go to the altar rail to receive Christ’s true Body and Blood in the bread and wine for the forgiveness of sins. We don’t need altar calls to make a decision for Christ, He already chose us.
How do Lutherans have the true Body and Blood of Christ?

Matthew
 
I just had a massive thread discussion on here about Eucharistic sacrifice, not sure it’s really this threads topic… You actually were already off topic if you wish to be that particular. The OP 's could in-fact lead 2 ways : one on the fact that an alter IS needed for sacrifice ( the point I was making) . The other on weather coming up for an ‘alter call’ was sufficient to become a member of the body of Christ. BOTH lines of thought however based on the fact that an alter call was not done in the Church or any body of believers calling themselves a Church until one man invented it in the 1900s. I ask the OP to please correct me if I am wrong if I am wrong in my interpretation of his intent.

The amount of varied topics in your post mean this will quickly become a discussion on everything… I posted simply as I saw something that was not actually what Protestants believe.I do not think you can speak for all Protestants having been one myself, I would have disagreed with your interpretation a few years ago since the church of England certainly did not have alter calls. In fact I would venture to guess that Calvin would have much to disagree with modern day Calvinists. And this is the crux of the matter really.

I’m well aware of John 6 and interpret it in a rather different way. So you are not Bible believing then?As for 1 Corinthians, im perfectly happy with them and the theology of Calvin.

Regards

Lincs
Blessings 🙂
 
Hi manualman,
Ha no worries, I find it best to quote scripture accuratley. I get your point, but Heb 10:14 “For by a single offering he has perfected for all time those who are sanctified.” I had this same thread only a few weeks ago, and this is what I kept bringing up. It perfects for all time. If it needs re-presenting in a propitiatory manner for the forgiveness of sin again and again… Where was the perfection for all time?
Lincs.
What Manualman and the Deacon and I am sure (many have tried to explain ) is what the Church teaches is that we are not RE -presenting Jesus every time at mass ,nor are we RE -sacrificing Him, we are stepping at that moment out of natural time and space . At the moment of consecration the veil to heaven is opened and we are present there at the ONE sacrifice with the angels and the Church triumphant. It is a mystery and it is for all because it was made possible for all as in not just the Jews but all the world. At the moment Jesus was on the cross and throughout time until the end. If you are really open to reading both sides of a case may I recommend a little book called The Lamb’s Supper. The Mass as Heaven on Earth. by Scott Hahn. This was his understanding while he was still protestant.

PAX
 
How do Lutherans have the true Body and Blood of Christ?

Matthew
Oriental Orthodox, Eastern Orthodox, Roman Catholic East/West have bread and wine and BELIEVE it to be the body and blood…without question. Lutherans and others have bread and wine and BELIEVE what they have is sacramental.

Now from one side of the fence or the other it is what it is. What differentiates what it is is BELIEF. Now Faith is the substance of things hoped for…we cannot see the body and blood…the evidence of things not seen…and in both cases it is a matter of Faith…it took me some time to admit that while I do not believe that any one outside the Catholic Church has the body and blood of Christ in the Eucharist…they do not believe it to be just bread and wine…I have seen reverence and an understanding different than mine…I could not believe as they do…but they do…

What they have is what they have…what we have is what we have…we believe it to be true…they believe it to be true…I would pray that they would want to have and believe as I do…but no one can change a belief for me except me…and the same is true for you…🙂

No debate will change a belief…It may cause questioning but no admission of OK, Alright…I am going to start believing like you…think of your own beliefs and how difficult it would be to change even if you lost an argument…🙂
 
Oriental Orthodox, Eastern Orthodox, Roman Catholic East/West have bread and wine and BELIEVE it to be the body and blood…without question. Lutherans and others have bread and wine and BELIEVE what they have is sacramental.

Now from one side of the fence or the other it is what it is. What differentiates what it is is BELIEF. Now Faith is the substance of things hoped for…we cannot see the body and blood…the evidence of things not seen…and in both cases it is a matter of Faith…it took me some time to admit that while I do not believe that any one outside the Catholic Church has the body and blood of Christ in the Eucharist…they do not believe it to be just bread and wine…I have seen reverence and an understanding different than mine…I could not believe as they do…but they do…

What they have is what they have…what we have is what we have…we believe it to be true…they believe it to be true…I would pray that they would want to have and believe as I do…but no one can change a belief for me except me…and the same is true for you…🙂

No debate will change a belief…It may cause questioning but no admission of OK, Alright…I am going to start believing like you…think of your own beliefs and how difficult it would be to change even if you lost an argument…🙂
I hear what you are saying and agree faith is definitely a component BUT if faith is ALL it takes to make the bread and wine into the real presence of Jesus then when I go up to receive I am getting Jesus - body , blood , soul and divinity- no bread and wine , but my cradle Catholic neighbor in line behind me ,who disagrees with the church and agrees more with some Protestant thought that the bread and wine is a symbol , gets …bread and wine as a symbol??? sorry I have to say your line of thought does not make sense.
If this were the case then there would be no Eucharistic miracles like Lanciano, miracles that continue to this day. Which by the way have been scientifically tested by non- Catholics and proven to veritably have " muscular tissue from the myocardium of a human heart… blood …was AB positive …human in origin…proteins in the coagulated blood were found to be normally fractionated, in the same percentage ratio as those found in normal FRESH BLOOD" emphasis mine. Source: May-June Catholic Answers mag available on this website and their source was Eucharistic Miracles by Joan Carroll Cruz ( which I also have read). Note that the miracle at Lanciano 1st happened in 700AD was documented and has continued to this day and is one of many documented Eucharistic miracles not to mention I would say 100sof thousands of little personal undocumented ones.
Just a thought.
 
What Manualman and the Deacon and I am sure (many have tried to explain ) is what the Church teaches is that we are not RE -presenting Jesus every time at mass ,nor are we RE -sacrificing Him, we are stepping at that moment out of natural time and space . At the moment of consecration the veil to heaven is opened and we are present there at the ONE sacrifice with the angels and the Church triumphant. It is a mystery and it is for all because it was made possible for all as in not just the Jews but all the world. At the moment Jesus was on the cross and throughout time until the end. If you are really open to reading both sides of a case may I recommend a little book called The Lamb’s Supper. The Mass as Heaven on Earth. by Scott Hahn. This was his understanding while he was still protestant.

PAX
Amen Maryann! Most who don’t believe and even ridicule us Catholics for what we do, look only at what we mere humans do. They tend to forget what God is doing. In John 6;63 Jesus gives us the ability, if we concentrate on Him and not ourselves, to understand what He means, “It is the spirit that gives life, while the flesh is of no avail. The words I have spoken to you are spirit and life.”

Here is the difference, when I baptize a little infant; some see me, the minister, pouring water on a baby’s head. Others see, a minister being obedient to God’s message in scripture and God saving this little one’s soul by the washing by water. God sees a child dying with His Son and rising to new life in Christ Jesus. Here is the secret, IT"S NOT THE MINISTER! Yes the minister goes through the motions obediently, but it is God through Jesus Christ who saves us, no minister can do that. Neither can an altar call. Baptism by water changes one’s soul; an indelible mark is made on a person’s souls by God. We can’t see it, or taste it, or hear it, but we believe it happens. Praise God, I believe it happens. The Eucharist is the same, and that is what Jesus meant in that verse. Walking in the Spirit is walking in life. We may not see or understand, but the mystery of faith remains.

When a priest stands at the altar and goes through the motions obediently, God works a miricle before our eyes. No, we can’t see it; although there are many documented Eucharistic miricles if you’re interested google them. The miricle is this, the Sacrifice of the Mass is the eternal Sacrifice of Jesus on Calvary. If you believe that Sacrifice is eternal, isn’t today part of eternity??? To understand what it is don’t think, pray! Only the Lord can help a person see His truth.

The 12 who had walked with Jesus for years didn’t understand what He spoke about in John 6 either, but they put their faith in Him and stayed, Simon Peter answered him, “Master, to whom shall we go? You have the words of eternal life.” (Jn. 6:68)
 
I hear what you are saying and agree faith is definitely a component BUT if faith is ALL it takes to make the bread and wine into the real presence of Jesus then when I go up to receive I am getting Jesus - body , blood , soul and divinity- no bread and wine , but my cradle Catholic neighbor in line behind me ,who disagrees with the church and agrees more with some Protestant thought that the bread and wine is a symbol , gets …bread and wine as a symbol??? sorry I have to say your line of thought does not make sense.
If this were the case then there would be no Eucharistic miracles like Lanciano, miracles that continue to this day. Which by the way have been scientifically tested by non- Catholics and proven to veritably have " muscular tissue from the myocardium of a human heart… blood …was AB positive …human in origin…proteins in the coagulated blood were found to be normally fractionated, in the same percentage ratio as those found in normal FRESH BLOOD" emphasis mine. Source: May-June Catholic Answers mag available on this website and their source was Eucharistic Miracles by Joan Carroll Cruz ( which I also have read). Note that the miracle at Lanciano 1st happened in 700AD was documented and has continued to this day and is one of many documented Eucharistic miracles not to mention I would say 100sof thousands of little personal undocumented ones.
Just a thought.
Mary,

I was speaking of two beliefs in separate venues. You translated that to two people believing differently at the same venue…It is what it is…belief does not change what is…you look at the reality and I am speaking of perception…sacraments operate as you know in Faith…the intention of the believer motivated by grace for your person in line behind you is lacking…it does not change what is however to suggest that the person in line who lacks that Faith…is the same as the one in front that has that Faith is the same is not what I am saying…

The miracles are what they are and yet you will see those that are outside the Faith are not moved to accept these miracles. You may want to read the postings about this issue…the discussion was not about accepting these miracles because their Faith did not allow them to do so…they just dismissed them…🙂
 
Oriental Orthodox, Eastern Orthodox, Roman Catholic East/West have bread and wine and BELIEVE it to be the body and blood…without question. Lutherans and others have bread and wine and BELIEVE what they have is sacramental.

Now from one side of the fence or the other it is what it is. What differentiates what it is is BELIEF. Now Faith is the substance of things hoped for…we cannot see the body and blood…the evidence of things not seen…and in both cases it is a matter of Faith…it took me some time to admit that while I do not believe that any one outside the Catholic Church has the body and blood of Christ in the Eucharist…they do not believe it to be just bread and wine…I have seen reverence and an understanding different than mine…I could not believe as they do…but they do…

What they have is what they have…what we have is what we have…we believe it to be true…they believe it to be true…I would pray that they would want to have and believe as I do…but no one can change a belief for me except me…and the same is true for you…🙂

No debate will change a belief…It may cause questioning but no admission of OK, Alright…I am going to start believing like you…think of your own beliefs and how difficult it would be to change even if you lost an argument…🙂
Hello CC, Sorry for taking so long to reply… I have issues with my handicapped sister.
I agree Although i can believe my car can fly and my lawn mower can swim does not make it true. The reason i asked this question was Luther of all people divorced himself from the Catholic Church therefore lost Authority and Valid Holy orders.
This is also true with all non-catholic Christians.
The fact of the matter is Only the Catholic Church has a Valid Holy Eucharist.
But you know people can believe whatever they want whether it’s true or not.:rolleyes:

Matthew
 
Mary,

I was speaking of two beliefs in separate venues. You translated that to two people believing differently at the same venue…It is what it is…belief does not change what is…you look at the reality and I am speaking of perception…sacraments operate as you know in Faith…the intention of the believer motivated by grace for your person in line behind you is lacking…it does not change what is however to suggest that the person in line who lacks that Faith…is the same as the one in front that has that Faith is the same is not what I am saying…

The miracles are what they are and yet you will see those that are outside the Faith are not moved to accept these miracles. You may want to read the postings about this issue…the discussion was not about accepting these miracles because their Faith did not allow them to do so…they just dismissed them…🙂
By the way it is MaryANN but anyway. It matters not if it is one or 2 different venues , I was trying to make very clear what infact you say that you do believe but perhaps I misunderstood you so let me get this correct …you were NOT saying that just because people BELIEVE/have faith that the bread and wine are Jesus makes the bread and wine so? In which case you were agreeing with the point I was trying to make that the real presence of Jesus in the Eucharist at a Catholic mass has NOTHING to do with what we believe in faith OR perceive.
To me your post seemed to indicate a ‘well I believe we have it right but they have their own beliefs and who are we to be able to change them’ sort of attitude. I wholeheartedly disagree with your last point that one can not by argument, or let us say discussion , change a persons understanding and bring them to a proper understanding of the truth. If that were the case none of us would be here and the Church would not exist because the apostles and early evangelists would not have had any converts either!! Your point completely baffles me because it is so illogical.
 
Hello CC, Sorry for taking so long to reply… I have issues with my handicapped sister.
I agree Although i can believe my car can fly and my lawn mower can swim does not make it true. The reason i asked this question was Luther of all people divorced himself from the Catholic Church therefore lost Authority and Valid Holy orders.
This is also true with all non-catholic Christians.
The fact of the matter is Only the Catholic Church has a Valid Holy Eucharist.
But you know people can believe whatever they want whether it’s true or not.:rolleyes:

Matthew
Luther was excommunicated from the Catholic Church and declared an outlaw, He did not divorce himself from the Church. Whether you want to admit it or not, there was a lot of abuses: indulgences, relics, illiterate priests just to mention a few. Nowhere in the Bible does it mention that there is a need for the Office of the Papacy, Besides if Lutheran Communion isn’t valid, then the Eastern Churches that are not in communion with Rome are valid.😃
 
Specifically?
Take, eat, this is my body. We have His promise that when we take and eat, as He instituted His Supper, He is present in true body and true blood, for the forgiveness of our sins.
 
By the way it is MaryANN but anyway. It matters not if it is one or 2 different venues , I was trying to make very clear what infact you say that you do believe** but perhaps I misunderstood you so let me get this correct **…you were NOT saying that just because people BELIEVE/have faith that the bread and wine are Jesus makes the bread and wine so? In which case you were agreeing with the point I was trying to make that the real presence of Jesus in the Eucharist at a Catholic mass has NOTHING to do with what we believe in faith OR perceive.
To me your post seemed to indicate a ‘well I believe we have it right but they have their own beliefs and who are we to be able to change them’ sort of attitude. I wholeheartedly disagree with your last point that one can not by argument, or let us say discussion , change a persons understanding and bring them to a proper understanding of the truth. If that were the case none of us would be here and the Church would not exist because the apostles and early evangelists would not have had any converts either!! Your point completely baffles me because it is so illogical.
Ann,

It matters not…to you. Understand that.

The best way to clarify a belief is to ask. You did not. I suggest a direct question for a direct answer.

But perhaps I misunderstood you negates everything you said before and therefore I would agree that you misunderstood me.

You are not saying that what you believe causes the sacrament to be the sacrament are you? The answer is equivalent to the question. No.

I wholeheartedly disagree. This reminds me of the movie a few good. Men…“I object”…noted…“your honor I strenously object”…ading words to what you declare degrades the intention…You disagree…noted.

A proper understanding of the truth. That is interesting.

Look at some basics here and I will guide you to an example of which I speak when I find it.

Ask yourself this question…

What is a belief? My answer is it is a filter…this is based on NLP…

nlpcoaching.com/nlp-commmunication.html
Beliefs:
The next filter is beliefs. Beliefs are generalizations about how the world is. One of the important elements in modeling is to find a person’s beliefs about the particular behavior we are trying to model. Richard Bandler says “Beliefs are those things we can’t get around.” Beliefs are the presuppositions that we have about the way the world is that either create or deny personal power to us. So, beliefs are essentially our on/off switch for our ability to do anything in the world. In the process of working with someone’s beliefs, it’s important to elicit or find out what beliefs they have that cause them to do what they do. We also want to find out the disabling beliefs, the ones that do not allow them to do what they want to do.
Understand that when you communicate that there are certain rules operating whether you know it or not…we are in effect speaking different languages in our communication.

Understand that a belief is a filter that does something to information based on that belief. You may not agree, you may not like it, you may not understand it…but this is fact that is predictable and can be understood by observation.

Next ask yourself how is it I come to believe anything…
  1. Fact
  2. Assumption
  3. False Conclusion
If you can think of another way I am open to that however I believe that this is it…

Step off a building and you will fall to the ground because you know gravity is in effect. Fact therefore you do not step off a building because you believe you will fall.

I have never touched a stove that is hot and I assume that flesh will not burn. Assumption that will be clarified by fact.

I have read about all the information I need from the Yogi’s that electricity is a charge of nature and when I put my finger in a light socket I conclude it will energize me and I will get smarter. False conclusion that will lead to fact that will allow you to get smarter.

The Eucharist is based on an assumption. There is no way to prove it as fact. The miracles persuade you and me but not others. So is it a fact?

The Lords Supper everywhere else outside the validiy of consecration gives grace. I conclude that this is a false assumption. Here is the kicker…it has been my experience that Lutherans, in particular JohnNC…believes it to be a source of grace…am I to ridicule him…degrade him…after much dialogue I came to the conclusion based on what I read that whether he concludes falsely or not is not for me to determine for him. He sees it as a source of grace. I disagree…the arguments are all over this website…I don’t see him changing his mind…I see a deep love for Christ, I see Charity, I see support of the Catholic Faith…so what is the point of arguing with a Lutheran that is strong in their Faith that often times rallies to the support of the views of the OHCAC…does he receive grace…I do not know…I pray that he does…Lord help not my belief…help my unbelief.

God is impartial and God of all Catholic, Lutheran, etc…all that are baptized are in the New Covenant…those that disagree with you have the gifts of Faith, Hope and Charity…you will see the fruits of those gifts…so your brother does not accept your view…no amount of argument is going to change their mind…

You will see when I provide that example that “only you can change your mind”🙂
 
By the way it is MaryANN but anyway. It matters not if it is one or 2 different venues , I was trying to make very clear what infact you say that you do believe but perhaps I misunderstood you so let me get this correct …you were NOT saying that just because people BELIEVE/have faith that the bread and wine are Jesus makes the bread and wine so? In which case you were agreeing with the point I was trying to make that the real presence of Jesus in the Eucharist at a Catholic mass has NOTHING to do with what we believe in faith OR perceive.
To me your post seemed to indicate a ‘well I believe we have it right but they have their own beliefs and who are we to be able to change them’ sort of attitude. I wholeheartedly disagree with your last point that one can not by argument, or let us say discussion , change a persons understanding and bring them to a proper understanding of the truth. If that were the case none of us would be here and the Church would not exist because the apostles and early evangelists would not have had any converts either!! Your point completely baffles me because it is so illogical.
M,

I found the thread link…follow the dialogue with David Ruiz and I to its conclusion. I never argued, I just presented information and ultimately it was David who changed his mind. A belief was changed by correcting a false conclusion…start with post #55

forums.catholic-questions.org/showthread.php?t=668167&page=4

This will illustrate my point. You may look at it, not look at it, agree, disagree…but it is there.
 
M,

I found the thread link…follow the dialogue with David Ruiz and I to its conclusion. I never argued, I just presented information and ultimately it was David who changed his mind. A belief was changed by correcting a false conclusion…start with post #55

forums.catholic-questions.org/showthread.php?t=668167&page=4

This will illustrate my point. You may look at it, not look at it, agree, disagree…but it is there.
Coptic, this link brings us right back to “Alter Calls are”. Did you mean to post a different link?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top