J
joanofarc2008
Guest
I probably was not as clear as I could have been either.Sorry I misread your post, and I’ve edited mine.![]()
I probably was not as clear as I could have been either.Sorry I misread your post, and I’ve edited mine.![]()
Well, from what I’ve learned in this thread thus far, altar boys are the normative and altar girls are the exception. This is much in the same where recieving the Eucharist standing and in the hand is the exception, whilst kneeling and on the tongue is the normative.Altar servers can be female.
The pope has had a female altar server at his mass.
Female altar servers have waiting a long, long time to do this. I do hope you won’t suggest to your church higher-up that this is an “unfortunate” set-up in the church.
Yes it is a good idea to get young women in front of devout and enthusiastic nuns and sisters.Well, from what I’ve learned in this thread thus far, altar boys are the normative and altar girls are the exception. This is much in the same where recieving the Eucharist standing and in the hand is the exception, whilst kneeling and on the tongue is the normative.
As a woman, this is not a men vs. women issue. Young ladies should be a part of the community and it would do good to remember that they are girls and thus they have certain needs and requirements to foster within them an authentically Catholic femininity. This is the same that should be considered for the boys to instil in them a genuine Catholic masculinity.
I just think it would be better to look to the various women religious orders to inspire our young girls rather than for me personally, involvement in something that is unique to the priest.
No, I won’t say it’s “unfortunate” but, I will see about getting involved in the youth ministry to see what can be done to encourage the boys so that there is no need for the girls.
Here is the issue in a nut shell - the role of altar server - the correct term - is a role that is used in fostering vocation. Due to this some feel that it is only right that boys should serve in this role. However, there are some that also see that being close to the Eucharist and the celebration of the Mass can foster vocation in religious life for girls as well. I personally believe in our role of being obedient that it is best left to up to the decision of those who run our dioceses and our parishes.
I think the reason we don’t have altar boys is that boys (at that age) simply don’t want to be altar boys. Teenaged girls are just more organized, more enthusiastic about participating in a large social gathering and just are better able to manage that kind of responsibility (aka they’re basically perfect for the role of being an altar server).I’m sure if more boys became altar servers there would be more altar boys.
Agreed. It is true that Pope Benedict XVI has used female altar servers in Papal masses in London (2010), Berlin and Freiburg (2011). Only one diocese in America, the diocese of Lincoln, Nebraska does not permit female altar servers.Here is the issue in a nut shell - the role of altar server - the correct term - is a role that is used in fostering vocation. Due to this some feel that it is only right that boys should serve in this role. However, there are some that also see that being close to the Eucharist and the celebration of the Mass can foster vocation in religious life for girls as well. I personally believe in our role of being obedient that it is best left to up to the decision of those who run our dioceses and our parishes.
This is not accurate. You keep trying to frame girls as altar servers as the exception, and not “preferred”, etc. This simply isn’t the case. Altar server, unlike acolyte, is a lay role. And therefore any lay person can fill it.Well, from what I’ve learned in this thread thus far, altar boys are the normative and altar girls are the exception.
Again, I would suggest you are mistaken.This is much in the same where recieving the Eucharist standing and in the hand is the exception, whilst kneeling and on the tongue is the normative.
First, I was taking into account also the many links that I have been given. I’m not trying to “frame” simply stating what I have found. You are free to disagree, of course.This is not accurate. You keep trying to frame girls as altar servers as the exception, and not “preferred”, etc. This simply isn’t the case. Altar server, unlike acolyte, is a lay role. And therefore any lay person can fill it.
Again, I would suggest you are mistaken.
Standing is the norm in the US, and I believe also in Canada and most other places, writtten right into the rubrics. I’ve been to many masses, in many countries, and standing has been the norm wherever I’ve gone.
Communion on tongue versus hand are equal. It is the communicant’s choice.
Gee, you’re not even Catholic yet, and things are apparently “sad” and “misunderstood” and “unfortunate” and “wrong” in the Church? Come in with a child’s faith and don’t come looking for contention.First, I was taking into account also the many links that I have been given. I’m not trying to “frame” simply stating what I have found. You are free to disagree, of course.
With regards to receiving the Eucharist, however, you are wrong. Canon Law states that kneeling and on the tongue is the normative. Sadly in America/Canada Vatican 2 was misunderstood and was taken to mean in spirit one could violate Canon Law, but this is not so. No decree from any Bishop overrules Canon Law. There have even been Vatican officials that have said as much these few years.
An attitude that the Church is wrong and that we are going to save the Church from itself is a clear indication that we have our priorities backwards.Gee, you’re not even Catholic yet, and things are apparently “sad” and “misunderstood” and “unfortunate” and “wrong” in the Church? Come in with a child’s faith and don’t come looking for contention.
That would be great, except that many parish churches and schools don’t have any women in religious orders (nuns, sisters).Well, from what I’ve learned in this thread thus far, altar boys are the normative and altar girls are the exception. This is much in the same where recieving the Eucharist standing and in the hand is the exception, whilst kneeling and on the tongue is the normative.
As a woman, this is not a men vs. women issue. Young ladies should be a part of the community and it would do good to remember that they are girls and thus they have certain needs and requirements to foster within them an authentically Catholic femininity. This is the same that should be considered for the boys to instil in them a genuine Catholic masculinity.
I just think it would be better to look to the various women religious orders to inspire our young girls rather than for me personally, involvement in something that is unique to the priest.
No, I won’t say it’s “unfortunate” but, I will see about getting involved in the youth ministry to see what can be done to encourage the boys so that there is no need for the girls.
The Church teaches faith and reason together. I have enormous faith in the Church, why else would I still be coming in given what I know? This knowledge that the people, not the Church, but the people are flawed causes me to love them even more. And it is because I’m in love with the Church, that I seek to do my part as a member of this Body, to aid the Bride of Christ to be obedient. She is the Bride of Christ, we should care for and honour her as such.Gee, you’re not even Catholic yet, and things are apparently “sad” and “misunderstood” and “unfortunate” and “wrong” in the Church? Come in with a child’s faith and don’t come looking for contention.
The Church is here to save you, not the other way around.The Church teaches faith and reason together. I have enormous faith in the Church, why else would I still be coming in given what I know? This knowledge that the people, not the Church, but the people are flawed causes me to love them even more. And it is because I’m in love with the Church, that I seek to do my part as a member of this Body, to aid the Bride of Christ to be obedient. She is the Bride of Christ, we should care for and honour her as such.
If your sister was getting married and her dress got caught and torn unaware without her knowledge, would you forever hold your peace or would you tell her and help her if she asked?
Well, the parish in question is located in a major metropolitan area, and has several ministries. The parish itself has Secular Franciscans, and Opus Dei also has a ministry at another parish, I believe. But what I meant when I said “look” is not necessarily a field trip, but rather the study of how they live their lives and take it and have a girls ministry perhaps, which encourages young girls in living out various walks. Perhaps for fun one could try out the Rule which Mother Teresa wrote for the Missionary Sisters of Charity?That would be great, except that many parish churches and schools don’t have any women in religious orders (nuns, sisters).
So if a parent wants to have their daughters “look to the various women religious orders” for inspiration, they have to take them on field trips to convents and monasteries. This is just an “occasional” exposure, not the constant exposure that would be ideal for “inspiration.”
I think that girls should be encouraged by their parents to say “Yes” to opportunities to serve Christ and His Church wherever those opportunities to serve exist. At this time in history, the leadership of the Church has opened up the opportunity for females to serve at the altar, as long as the territorial authority grants permission.
I think that parents need to ponder very carefully whether or not they should turn down this service opportunity that the Holy Mother Church has given to their daughters. I would ask, “If my daughter does NOT serve at the altar, what other service is she involved with for our parish, and if she is not involved with service to the parish, how is she learning to serve Christ and His Church, and how is this learning experience helping her to seriously consider a vocation to a religious life?”
It is Christ alone who saves. The Church is just one of the ways he does so. Again, this does not mean we ignore charity and allow parishes to do whatever they please without question. It’s just that attitude that allows for liturgical abuses such as dancing and contemporary music.The Church is here to save you, not the other way around.
-Tim-
Sort of.Ultimately, I believe it is up to the priest presiding who he will allow to serve. The Bishop could set a “norm” for the diocese that must followed, but Pastor’s have some autonomy in how things are done in their parish, and I am pretty sure this falls into that realm.
I am sure someone will correct me if I am wrong!![]()