B
bfree1216
Guest
In Mark 10:17, it’s written: “Jesus answered him, ’Why do you call me good? No one is good but God alone.’”
I’m all on board with Jesus’s divinity. And I sort of get the argument here of how Christ confirms his divinity in this passage (although maybe clarifying that answer could help me clarify my main question). But I have a more pressing question that is really confusing to me:
If God alone is good, is nothing else good? At all?
For instance, the apologetics argument for affirming Christ’s divinity here is usually as follows:
Sunsets are good, so sunsets are God? Exercising is good, so exercising is God?
My main one: humans are good, therefore humans are God…?
I know this isn’t right, but someone help me out here.
It seems obvious to me that things are good without being God, and even good without God (as in, they’re good as a distinct entity on their own, apart from being any extension of God Himself. In other words, not pantheism/panentheism). Especially humans, made in the image and likeness of God.
But even saying something like “on their own, humans are not good” seems to deny the innate goodness of humanity. I can agree that on their own, humans are often left to their sinful nature, and the works of the flesh take precedent (lust, greed, all that not fun stuff). But, to assert that only God is good seems like a real sucker punch to the innate goodness of a lot of things, especially humanity (which Catholicism in particular greatly affirms).
Any help here?
I’m all on board with Jesus’s divinity. And I sort of get the argument here of how Christ confirms his divinity in this passage (although maybe clarifying that answer could help me clarify my main question). But I have a more pressing question that is really confusing to me:
If God alone is good, is nothing else good? At all?
For instance, the apologetics argument for affirming Christ’s divinity here is usually as follows:
- Nothing is good but God alone
- Jesus calls Himself good on several occasions (“good shepherd”, etc.)
- Therefore, Jesus is God
Sunsets are good, so sunsets are God? Exercising is good, so exercising is God?
My main one: humans are good, therefore humans are God…?
I know this isn’t right, but someone help me out here.
It seems obvious to me that things are good without being God, and even good without God (as in, they’re good as a distinct entity on their own, apart from being any extension of God Himself. In other words, not pantheism/panentheism). Especially humans, made in the image and likeness of God.
But even saying something like “on their own, humans are not good” seems to deny the innate goodness of humanity. I can agree that on their own, humans are often left to their sinful nature, and the works of the flesh take precedent (lust, greed, all that not fun stuff). But, to assert that only God is good seems like a real sucker punch to the innate goodness of a lot of things, especially humanity (which Catholicism in particular greatly affirms).
Any help here?
Last edited: