Ambiguities about Serra should not discount sainthood, panelists say

  • Thread starter Thread starter lvcabbie
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
L

lvcabbie

Guest
My first reaction: What “ambiguities?” The man spent almost every hour of his entire life dedicated to what he deeply felt – the spread of Christianity to disbelievers and helping Iron Age peoples advance into the 18th Century. He did not enslave anybody. Nor did he cruelly beat or torture a single one.

If he was evil, why did peoples who had never traveled more than one day’s distance from their homes travel hundreds of miles to pass by the Blessed Father’s grave?

Let’s cut to the chase and celebrate Blessed Father Serra for what he was – the dedicated leader of men who devoted their life to their deepest beliefs.

Read more @ catholicnews.com/data/stories/cns/1501767.htm
 
My first reaction: What “ambiguities?” The man spent almost every hour of his entire life dedicated to what he deeply felt – the spread of Christianity to disbelievers and helping Iron Age peoples advance into the 18th Century. He did not enslave anybody. Nor did he cruelly beat or torture a single one.

If he was evil, why did peoples who had never traveled more than one day’s distance from their homes travel hundreds of miles to pass by the Blessed Father’s grave?

Let’s cut to the chase and celebrate Blessed Father Serra for what he was – the dedicated leader of men who devoted their life to their deepest beliefs.

Read more @ catholicnews.com/data/stories/cns/1501767.htm
I agree entirely. The man was totally dedicated to his work, traveling mostly by walking or by mule all over California to establish missions. Toward the end of his life, he walked all the way from the northernmost missions to the southernmost missions to Confirm those whom he had baptized.
 
My first reaction: What “ambiguities?” The man spent almost every hour of his entire life dedicated to what he deeply felt – the spread of Christianity to disbelievers and helping Iron Age peoples advance into the 18th Century. He did not enslave anybody. Nor did he cruelly beat or torture a single one.

If he was evil, why did peoples who had never traveled more than one day’s distance from their homes travel hundreds of miles to pass by the Blessed Father’s grave?

Let’s cut to the chase and celebrate Blessed Father Serra for what he was – the dedicated leader of men who devoted their life to their deepest beliefs.

Read more @ catholicnews.com/data/stories/cns/1501767.htm
Who’s business is it anyway if we, the Catholic Church, canonize one of ours as a Saint. They don’t have anything to say about it. Besides if they put as much time and effort into studying the life of Fr. Serra as the Canonization process did, maybe they would learn to love him too. God Bless, Memaw
 
It interests me to read of California native “tribes” complaining about this decision.

I was asking myself - did the Upper and Lower California Indians have tribes before the arrival of the Spanish?

Think upon it. These Iron Age peoples never traveled more than one day from where they were born. Their only interaction with other families/clans was to get fresh blood in the form of young boys and girls.

They had no tribal councils or chiefs beyond the head of clans or families.

Check out my thoughts on this @ Father Serra’s Legacy, msgdaleday,.blogspot.com
 
Canonization doesn’t mean Junipero Serra was perfect
I am carefully seeking out article about the Blessed Father’s canonization. This is one that seems to present a fair and honest assessment of Father Serra based upon FACTUAL evidence - not just innuendos from people who were never there.

Robert Senkewicz and Rose Marie Beebe speak at a media briefing on Blessed Junipero Serra sponsored by the Los Angeles archdiocese Thursday in Rome. (CNS/Paul Haring)
Cindy Wooden Catholic News Service | Apr. 30, 2015 @ ncronline.org/news/people/canonization-doesnt-mean-junipero-serra-was-perfect-experts-say

ROME Blessed Junipero Serra is being canonized because he was holy, not because he was perfect, said a team of experts on the life and ministry of the 18th-century Spanish missionary.
Although he is a historian, not a theologian, Robert Senkewicz said: “My sense is that people are not canonized because they are perfect – otherwise, presumably, St. Peter would never have been canonized. They are canonized because they made a commitment which, on balance, had more good than non-good associated with it.”

Senkewicz, a professor of history at Santa Clara University in California, and Rose Marie Beebe, his wife who also is a professor at Santa Clara, are co-authors of a new biography, Junipero Serra: California, Indians, and the Transformation of a Missionary.

The Los Angeles archdiocese hosted a media briefing about Serra on Thursday in Rome; the four speakers were scheduled to attend a study day about Serra and a Mass with Pope Francis on Saturday at the Pontifical North American College, the U.S. seminary in Rome.

Pope Francis is scheduled to canonize Serra on Sept. 23 at the Basilica of the National Shrine of the Immaculate Conception in Washington.

GSR-video.jpgGlobal Sisters Report just celebrated its first year! Watch a video highlighting some of the stories that have been featured on the site.
The pope’s decision, however, has led to some controversy, particularly over how Serra treated Native Americans.

Beebe, a professor of Spanish literature who has translated Serra’s letters and homilies, said that through her work, she has come to see him as “a complex human being, warts and all,” who was “transformed by working with the indigenous people.”

Ruben Mendoza, a professor of archaeology at California State University, Monterey Bay, and a person who describes himself as being of Mexican-Indian descent, told Catholic News Service that Serra was devoted to the Native Americans and to sharing the Gospel with them.

“The irony is that, over these many years, those same communities tend to criticize him for what he did: evangelize them and bring them a different way of looking at the world.”

“I think he would have been mortified if he realized the very people that he loved, that he devoted his life to, would now see him as the culprit in their disintegration,” Mendoza said.

The professor has been involved in research and conservation projects at several California missions founded by Serra. He said many of the Spanish missionary’s critics are confusing the impact of Spanish colonizing and missionary activity on the native communities with what happened after California became a U.S. territory in 1848.

“A decimation of the Native American population,” Mendoza said, occurred “in the period after 1850; Serra had no connection to that phenomenon. Those who criticize Serra the most tend to conflate the American period with that of the missionaries.”

Another major objection to Serra’s canonization involves reports that Native American adults at his mission were beaten.

“There is no documentation that Serra himself abused any Native American,” Mendoza said. “The system under which he operated did use corporal punishment, but that was also used for transgressors from all walks of life, including soldiers.”

Mendoza supports the canonization and said he believes it “has much to offer the peoples of Latin America, especially those of us of Mexican-Indian heritage who currently live under a shadow of doubt and denigration.”

Msgr. Francis Weber, a historian and former archivist of the Los Angeles archdiocese, told reporters he was certain Serra does not care whether he is canonized, but “I care.”

The job of an archivist and historian, he said, is “reading other people’s mail” and letters from people who knew Serra demonstrate his total devotion to evangelizing, educating and administering the sacraments to the native peoples of what is now California.

What is more, he said, “five nations have concluded that Father Junipero Serra was worthy of [being honored on] a postage stamp – that’s a distinction even more rare than canonization.”

Weber said church officials in California and at the Vatican spent “72 years sifting through” historical evidence to verify that he lived a holy life, loving God and serving others. “Serra did this in a way that went far beyond the average person.”

“He traveled to the periphery of the world – California was the end of world back then – to share his love of God with the Native Americans, whom he deeply loved and they loved him in return,” the monsignor said.
 
Although the article you quoted appeared in the notoriously heretical National Schismatic Reporter, its origin appears to be Catholic News Service, which is a solid and faithful arm of the USCCB.
 
It interests me to read of California native “tribes” complaining about this decision.

I was asking myself - did the Upper and Lower California Indians have tribes before the arrival of the Spanish?
Yes, there were Native Indian tribes in California before the arrival of the Spanish. This article might explain the “ambiguities.”
When archaeologist Ruben Mendoza was a boy, his father was prone to fiery outbursts in the family’s mobile home on the tough west side of Fresno. One of the biggest targets of his anger, Mendoza remembers, was the Catholic Church and its California missions.
“Over and over, he claimed Catholic missions were cancers that Spain brought to the New World,” Mendoza said.
Mendoza, who is of Yaqui Indian and Mexican American heritage, was shaped by his father’s hatred.
“I became obsessed with ‘pure’ ancient Indian cultures,” he recalled.

Mendoza, one of the founding faculty members at Cal State Monterey Bay, grew up believing that the controversial founder of the missions, Franciscan friar Junipero Serra, now on a track for sainthood, was an imperious theologian who imposed a slave system that destroyed the Indians’ way of life.
Later, his archaeological research revealed that the real story is more complicated than the caricature.
“Dig a little deeper,” the 58-year-old likes to say, “and you’ll find evidence of a new diverse society flourishing, one that makes California and its Latino culture unique.”
But not until he uncovered the chapel where Serra celebrated the first high Masses in Monterey did Mendoza have an awakening that finally changed how he felt about the priest.
Read the rest of the article: latimes.com/local/great-reads/la-me-c1-serra-awakening-20150317-story.html#page=1
 
Thank you very much for the link!
The vibrant native cultures that thrived around the missions where among the largest and most successful ranches in California
This fledgling culture was wiped out by by first the secular Mexican overthrow of Spain,that forced the protector Missionaries to return to their native land and the rapid take over of the Americans who viewed successful native enterprises as not fitting their view of manifest destiny.
These outposts were quickly assimilated and the native cultures they fostered wiped out.
I suggest everyone visit a mission and you gain respect for the love and determination shown by these man as they prepared the natives for success in a changing world.
The demise of the missionaries ,was the prelude to the demise of native culture
 
California’s soon-to-be saint hailed as a man ahead of his time

Another article dealing with the so-called controversy over Blessed Father Serra’s canonization. Once again, it centers around this:

Controversy over the canonization has stemmed from claims that Serra’s missions enacted forced labor and conversions as well as corporal punishment. Scholarship on the issue is divided, and Serra supporters contend that many of the accusations against Serra are rife with misinterpretations and factual errors.

Once again, claims made by those who were not there based upon assumptions and not facts. That’s why I like stories like this that put the friar and his times in perspective.

Read more @ catholicnewsagency.com/news/californias-soon-to-be-saint-hailed-as-a-man-ahead-of-his-time-65598/
 
Matthew 5:11 Blessed are you when they insult you and persecute you and utter every kind of evil against you (falsely) because of me.
12 Rejoice and be glad, for your reward will be great in heaven. Thus they persecuted the prophets who were before you.
**Luke 6:**22 Blessed are you when people hate you, and when they exclude and insult you, and denounce your name as evil on account of the Son of Man.
23 Rejoice and leap for joy on that day! Behold, your reward will be great in heaven. For their ancestors treated the prophets in the same way.
Here in the shadow of the Mission San Juan Capistrano, the Acjachema tribe converted to the Christianity Fray Junipero brought them. Some of them are buried right on the Mission grounds. To this day many of their ancestors call themselves the Juaneno (tribe).

The cause of potential saints are closely scrutinized by the Church. 300 years after his birth and a lifetime of self sacrifice that saw him heroically sacrificing a failing body to establish the chain of Missions resulting in most of California’s main cities being named after angels and saints … and the *El Camino Real * (The King’s Highway) being named for Jesus - it’s about time.

To those still opposed to this well deserved honor and committed to believing the worst of such a man … IMO …

(Please Note: This uploaded content is no longer available.)

What the Catholic Missionaries replaced by voluntary conversion was
“ … An eleaborate ceremonial cult, based on visions seen by initiates when they drank the narcotic juice of the poisonous jimson weed, toloach, seems to have originated on Santa catalina Island and in the vicinity of Los Angeles, and to have been carried by successive generations of native proselytists to the Juanenos, the Luisenos, and finally the Dieguenos.
How far this aboriginal religious wave would have spread if not checked by the greater dignity, force and civilization of the Catholic church, can only be conjectured, but it remains one of the most interesting of purely native attempts at higher culture and thought.
ROASTING GIRLS CEREMONIALLY
There is much else that is fascinating in connection with this remarkable tribe (Diegueno), their habit of “roasting girls” ceremonially at the period of adolescence …
– excerpted from p 432 of “San Diego County California - A Record of Settlement, Organization, Progress and Achievement” by Samuel F. Black Illustrated, Volume I
Chicago The S. J. Clarke Publishing Company 1913
books.google.com/books?id=NRU1AQAAMAAJ&pg=PA432&lpg=PA432&dq=conversion+of+the+Juanenos&source=bl&ots=eUFcJoOU6C&sig=PHB1D5oSQocyt_uVzAjpFYEpGnc&hl=en&sa=X&ei=s69OVerKGobBsAWA9YGoDA&ved=0CCkQ6AEwBDgK#v=onepage&q=conversion%20of%20the%20Juanenos&f=false
 
What Would Father Serra Think of Being Made a Saint?

While reading the article, Junípero Serra, saint or not? from the National Catholic Reporter @ ncronline.org/blogs/faith-and-justice/jun-pero-serra-saint-or-not , the above question hit me.

Having studied the man, I honestly believe he would bow his head at hearing the news, express his obedience to the will of the Holy Father, and plea that the decision be revoked. I do not believe the man ever felt himself free from sin and went to his grave believing he failed to fulfill his directive to spread The Word of God to the Gentiles and expand Spain’s control of California.

The scars upon his back attested to that. He spent endless nights on his knees begging The Lord’'s forgiveness for what he saw as his sins, often flagellating himself to the point of blood flowing down the thin flesh upon his back.

He would plea that his children, those who came to the missions to accept baptism and confirmation, suffered in later years because he somehow did not secure their futures.

I can imagine the tears rolling down his cheeks at watching was the Mexicans did to the missions and what the Americans did to the Gentiles by exiling them to reservations with none of the support the missions had provided them.

There is more to this @ msgdaleday.blogspot.com
 
To those who vehemently oppose the Roman Catholic Church, it is the very concept of evangelization that spawns their ire, and, it should be pointed out, that there is an organized, and radicalized, segment of this group that regularly stoops to using calumny and slander to wound any cause relative to the church.

Time has taught me to expect these sorts of tactics from our enemies, and it has also toughened my skin so that I am no so easily wounded by it. To us, Junipero Serra was a saint long before anyone decided to formally assign that title to him. Indeed, his was a very, very bright spirit. May he intercede for us all.
 
My first reaction: What “ambiguities?” The man spent almost every hour of his entire life dedicated to what he deeply felt – the spread of Christianity to disbelievers and helping Iron Age peoples advance into the 18th Century. He did not enslave anybody. Nor did he cruelly beat or torture a single one.

If he was evil, why did peoples who had never traveled more than one day’s distance from their homes travel hundreds of miles to pass by the Blessed Father’s grave?

Let’s cut to the chase and celebrate Blessed Father Serra for what he was – the dedicated leader of men who devoted their life to their deepest beliefs.

Read more @ catholicnews.com/data/stories/cns/1501767.htm
According to an article in the New York Times which has something to say about more recent historical research:
Born in Majorca in 1713, Father Serra joined the Franciscan order in 1730. He became an eminent theological professor before relinquishing his comfortable life to evangelize in the Americas. From 1769 to 1835, 90,000 Indians were baptized along the West Coast, from San Diego to San Francisco. Once baptized, they were not allowed to leave the missions, and those who did escape were rounded up by soldiers and returned.
The Indians were forced to shed their languages, dress, religion, food and marriage customs. Thousands died from exposure to European diseases to which they had no immunity. Of the approximately 310,000 Indians in 1769 in what is now California, only one-sixth remained a hundred years later, according to a University of California historian.
Native Americans have complained about not only the cultural sabotage but also what they call the romanticization of the missions’ true history by schools, churches and the news media.
They were especially upset when, in 1986, the Catholic Diocese of Monterey, Calif., where Father Serra is buried at the Carmel Mission, released a report that found no evidence of Indian mistreatment. While diocesan researchers released statements from historians and clergy, no Indians were interviewed.
Historians have since done more research. Steven W. Hackel, a history professor at the University of California, Riverside, and author of “Junipero Serra: California’s Founding Father,” said that Father Serra “was a man of his age” who considered Indians incapable of governing themselves or, for example, selecting a spouse.
The Franciscans made those decisions for the Indians, Mr. Hackel said. “They were forced to stay or were brought back by soldiers,” he said. “The Indians felt it was a coercive, disruptive form of slavery. The Franciscans saw it in a different light.”
Albert Camarillo, an American history professor at Stanford, said many Catholics saw “thousands of Indians who were Christianized and ‘civilized’ ” as a history of “benevolence, kindness and altruism.” Many Indians see “colonization characterized by the brutal treatment of native people, of forced labor and racial oppression,” he said, adding that the canonization of Father Serra would not put the debate to rest.
Archbishop Salvatore J. Cordileone of San Francisco, who credited Father Serra with bringing “Christianity to this part of the world,” said he understood why Indians were upset, acknowledging the whippings and coercive environment. But missionaries also taught school and farming, he said.
nytimes.com/2015/01/22/us/to-some-indians-in-california-father-serra-is-far-from-a-saint.html?_r=0

I think the most important statement from the article above is that Junipero Serra was “a man of his age” and probably had a typical attitude (or perhaps even better than a typical attitude) for a white man towards the native Americans.
 
To those who vehemently oppose the Roman Catholic Church, it is the very concept of evangelization that spawns their ire, and, it should be pointed out, that there is an organized, and radicalized, segment of this group that regularly stoops to using calumny and slander to wound any cause relative to the church.

Time has taught me to expect these sorts of tactics from our enemies, and it has also toughened my skin so that I am no so easily wounded by it. To us, Junipero Serra was a saint long before anyone decided to formally assign that title to him. Indeed, his was a very, very bright spirit. May he intercede for us all.
Thank you. I fully agree. I see it daily - not just against the Catholic church but Christianity in general. We’re in a war with the Satanists and must stand firm.👍
 
According to an article in the New York Times which has something to say about more recent historical research:

nytimes.com/2015/01/22/us/to-some-indians-in-california-father-serra-is-far-from-a-saint.html?_r=0

I think the most important statement from the article above is that Junipero Serra was “a man of his age” and probably had a typical attitude (or perhaps even better than a typical attitude) for a white man towards the native Americans.
I am working on a novel about Fernando de Rivera who served in Baja California starting in 1742 and acted as commandant/governor there and later in Alta California. Using letters provided by Jesuit Father Baegert and others, I described arriving at a mission with Father Jacobo and how the converts came to greet him. They wore the blue cotton garb provided for converts and, the moment they were free to go their way, they would tear them off and throw them to the ground before laying down to sleep on the ground - most almost naked.

Father Serra and the other friars saw the natives as children who had no purpose in life but to survive day to day. In many ways, their views and treatment of the Indians was a thousand times more tolerant than the Americans who fought them at every turn and then exiled them to lands that could not support them.

In fact, it was the first American governor of California who forced all Indians to be rounded up and sent to reservations determined by his officials. Something the Spanish never did.
 
This might be helpful for the thread. This is the text of Archbishop Jose Gomez’s address that was delivered at the “Day of Reflection on Fra Junípero Serra: Apostle of California, Witness to Holiness,” hosted by the Pontifical Commission for Latin America and the Archdiocese of Los Angeles at the Pontifical North American College on May 2, 2015.

The Spiritual Discovery of the New World
Junípero Serra’s Mission and America’s Religious Foundations and Future

By: Archbishop José H. Gomez

Link: angelusnews.com/voices/archbishop-gomez/the-spiritual-discovery-of-the-new-world-7874/
 
This might be helpful for the thread. This is the text of Archbishop Jose Gomez’s address that was delivered at the “Day of Reflection on Fra Junípero Serra: Apostle of California, Witness to Holiness,” hosted by the Pontifical Commission for Latin America and the Archdiocese of Los Angeles at the Pontifical North American College on May 2, 2015.

The Spiritual Discovery of the New World
Junípero Serra’s Mission and America’s Religious Foundations and Future
By: Archbishop José H. Gomez

Link: angelusnews.com/voices/archbishop-gomez/the-spiritual-discovery-of-the-new-world-7874/
Thanks for the link. Brilliant, honest, and irrefutable.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top