S
Swan
Guest
Let’s get this straight: You began this saga by responding to my comments on a post that had nothing to do with you. I was not responding to you nor did I reference you in my post; I was agreeing with other posters whom you disagree with and I guess that’s what got you all upset. So you posted a response that said basically: “if an internet site can destroy your faith it must not have been very strong to begin with”. This is a gross generalization, uncharitable and, as you were not a party to the posting, totally uncalled for. Had I personally attacked you in some way then you’re above response might be understandable. As it is, you are now upset because I found your offensive post offensive. The only thing “noteworhty” about this is that your obvious inability to understand that your post is offensive. I’m sure you still don’t see it so I’m going to drop it. Oh, one more thing: I might not be a “good” a “Christian” like you are but I do actually try not to hurt other’s feelings. As such, if I misinterpreted your intentions then I apologize. They sounded like a insult and I reacted thusly.You’ve posted a very interesting response. I post a brief response to your brief comments. Your response is to criticize and condemn me for making too much out of your brief comments. Yet, you have no problem doing the same to me and my brief comments. You accuse me of audacity and then are audacious enough yourself to draw all manner of conclusions about me, even calling me a know it all that lacks charity. Yet, who lacks charity in their response as well? You dare assume that you know me as well you think I am claiming to know you. In other words, you’re engaging in the generalizations, condemnations, and lack of charity that you’re accusing the majority of the members of this forum of engaging in. That is very interesting.
And for the record, my comment was not meant to condemn. It was meant as a simple observation by a fallible human being. Your reaction to that is noteworthy.