Zooey,
I don’t understand your statement (which I boldened above)
Could you elucidate us dull bulbs on this one?
I was arguing from the Catechism of the Catholic Church. I have not been arguing from Methodist doctrine, nor any other non-Catholic doctrine.
The Catholic Church teaches that, for baptism to be baptism, that it must be done after the proper Trinitarian formula. (Which is only common sense, really).
Lukewarm seems to believe that there is no difference from a cult (Mormons) who deny the Trinity & affirm their own progression to godhood, and non-Catholic Christians like myself, who are as appalled as Catholics when Mormons claim to be Christian, whilst despising Christ.
And I do not think Lukewarm is insulting Jesus in this thread, either. I can see what he means (although he does jump about in places) but I think that statement is a little harsh.
Robert
When he says, repeatedly, that there is no difference between a Mormon & a Methodist, he is saying (even if he can’t see it), that it makes no difference whether a person believes that Jesus Christ is the 2nd Person of the Trinity, & whether He is thought of as an earlier version of Joseph Smith.
That’s an insult to Christ, and it’s a slap at His suffering & death. Mind you, I don’t think he
realizes that. If I did, I wouldn’t have called it an insult. I would have called it

something a good deal worse.
Plenty of protestants disregard the Creeds, Baptists for one,
Pfui!!! They don’t recite them, perhaps; at least some of them. But they believe what they say, all the same.
also you may recite the creeds but you most certainly deny the Communion of Saints.
You need to call up my posts here, yean. You have no idea what I do & don’t believe or deny.
Anyway I haven’t insulted our Lord at all, I’m having a dialogue but you are incapable of it I see. You aren’t following simple logic.

I can follow
simple logic.
I can follow
fairly complex logic.
I carry on
dialogues all the time.
It’s
you I don’t follow, laddie.
