An EV comments on the ongoing struggle between Catholics and LDS.

  • Thread starter Thread starter Mudcat
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
No, no, no,
The LDS trinity doctrine comes from a different interpretation of the same Holy Scripture used by the Catholics to forumulate their trinity doctrine.
Since the Bible (Holy Scripture) is a Catholic document, this is much like another country taking our consitution and arriving at completely different set of laws based on that constitution and then claiming that the framers of that constitution didn’t understand what it really meant.

Amazing. :rolleyes:
 
No, no, no,
The LDS trinity doctrine comes from a different interpretation of the same Holy Scripture used by the Catholics to forumulate their trinity doctrine.
no…it comes from false prophets
 
No, no, no,
The LDS trinity doctrine comes from a different interpretation of the same Holy Scripture used by the Catholics to forumulate their trinity doctrine.
When I was LDS, we were taught that LDS doctrine, unlike Christian doctrine, was not derived from an interpretation of scripture, but was the result of direct revelation to the prophet Joseph Smith and his successors. Has Mormonism changed that much in 24 years? Is Mormonism now merely the result of fallible men pouring over the scriptures and giving their personal interpretations thereof?
 
Since the Bible (Holy Scripture) is a Catholic document, this is much like another country taking our consitution and arriving at completely different set of laws based on that constitution and then claiming that the framers of that constitution didn’t understand what it really meant.

Amazing. :rolleyes:
Ohh how I wish you could show me where the bible articulates your doctrine of the Trinity, of a triune God who is three co-equal Persons of One Nature.

You can’t do so because your trinity doctrine was fabricated/revealed close to 325 AD with the release of the Nicean Creed. And why do scholars claim you borrowed it from Greek philosophy?
 
]

I think the vatican quote clarifies that for a doctrine to qualify as a heresy, must first stem from the original Christian doctrine on the Trinity then changed makes it a heresy.

(“one cannot even consider this doctrine to be a heresy arising from a false understanding of Christian doctrine,” said a Vatican explanation of the ruling.)

The LDS definition of the Trinity never makes the cut to even be considered founded on the biblical Christian faith from Apostles.

This is not a negative remark about the LDS new doctrine of their trinity faith, but only reveals it cannot be a heresy because it has no foundation from the Apostolic faith to leave or lend itself into heresy.

In other words, the LDS trinity doctrine comes from another source other than the Trinity doctrine taught and revealed by Jesus. The question is "who then is the source the LDS gets it trinity doctrinal belief’s from? man? or another angel bringing another gospel?

Peace be with you
Any organization or individual that borrows from, or uses, standard Christian thought or terminology to describe or discuss an idea similar to but different from the original meaning of that Christian thought, or understanding, is in heresy.

The Church of Latter-day Saints ( Mormon ) uses Christian terminology and ideas borrowed from Christianity which meanings are entirely different from that of Christianity. It is therefore heretical regardless of it source.

Would you call Gnostics, with their myriad of theories and theologies borrowed from Christianity, as Christians and non-heretical?

PAX DOMINI :signofcross:

Shalom Aleichem
 
Ohh how I wish you could show me where the bible articulates your doctrine of the Trinity, of a triune God who is three co-equal Persons of One Nature.

You can’t do so because your trinity doctrine was fabricated/revealed close to 325 AD with the release of the Nicean Creed. And why do scholars claim you borrowed it from Greek philosophy?
Sorry, Todd, but you err. Christ originated the “Trinity doctrine” ( Doxology: “baptize them in the Name of the Father, and the Son, and the Holy Spirit” ). The Apostles knew of and understood the Trinity and used the term in the greetings and/or salutations of their letters. Also The early Chrch Fathers, long before 325 AD, used the “Trinity Doctrine”. The NT is full of references and description of the Trinity.

It would be nice if you read and understood scripture, the early Church Fathers, and Catholic Church history before you embarrass yourself with such statements.

PAX DOMINI :signofcross:

Shalom Aleichem
 
Any organization or individual that borrows from, or uses, standard Christian thought or terminology to describe or discuss an idea similar to but different from the original meaning of that Christian thought, or understanding, is in heresy.

The Church of Latter-day Saints ( Mormon ) uses Christian terminology and ideas borrowed from Christianity which meanings are entirely different from that of Christianity. It is therefore heretical regardless of it source.

Would you call Gnostics, with their myriad of theories and theologies borrowed from Christianity, as Christians and non-heretical?

PAX DOMINI :signofcross:

Shalom Aleichem
From a Catholic perspective, there are two ways of deviating from Christianity:

  1. *]by refusing to believe in Christ Himself, which is **the way of infidelity **common to Pagans and Jews
    *]by restricting belief to certain points of Christ’s doctrine selected and fashioned at pleasure, which is the way of heretics.
 
Any organization or individual that borrows from, or uses, standard Christian thought or terminology to describe or discuss an idea similar to but different from the original meaning of that Christian thought, or understanding, is in heresy.

The Church of Latter-day Saints ( Mormon ) uses Christian terminology and ideas borrowed from Christianity which meanings are entirely different from that of Christianity. It is therefore heretical regardless of it source.

Would you call Gnostics, with their myriad of theories and theologies borrowed from Christianity, as Christians and non-heretical?

PAX DOMINI :signofcross:

Shalom Aleichem
Mormonism however has strayed so far that they are not considered to be separated brethren. They are not of the same vine, they are something “other”.

That’s how I read the response for the question as to why we don’t recognize LDS baptisms as valid (ie, Christian).

Adding to that, I think it is a product of American Protestantism. More specifically, sola scriptura run amok.
 
Sorry, Todd, but you err. Christ originated the “Trinity doctrine” ( Doxology: “baptize them in the Name of the Father, and the Son, and the Holy Spirit” ). The Apostles knew of and understood the Trinity and used the term in the greetings and/or salutations of their letters. Also The early Chrch Fathers, long before 325 AD, used the “Trinity Doctrine”. The NT is full of references and description of the Trinity.

It would be nice if you read and understood scripture, the early Church Fathers, and Catholic Church history before you embarrass yourself with such statements.

PAX DOMINI :signofcross:

Shalom Aleichem
Javl,
OF COURSE the NT articulates the Father, Son and Holy Ghost
HOWEVER, it does not articulate a triune God who is three co-equal Persons of One Nature. (spirit Chimera)

I’ll eat my words if you can provide a CLEAR New Testiment reference.
 
Mormonism however has strayed so far that they are not considered to be separated brethren. They are not of the same vine, they are something “other”.

That’s how I read the response for the question as to why we don’t recognize LDS baptisms as valid (ie, Christian).

Adding to that, I think it is a product of American Protestantism. More specifically, sola scriptura run amok.
Yes Rebecca,
I am a heretic per Rome
 
Javl,
OF COURSE the NT articulates the Father, Son and Holy Ghost
HOWEVER, it does not articulate a triune God who is three co-equal Persons of One Nature. (spirit Chimera)

I’ll eat my words if you can provide a CLEAR New Testiment reference.
show me in the NT where God was once a sinful man…

come on…

I’m waiting…
 
nope…but your prophet did

was he lying?
once again, we must be a broken record with STM

Please provide a clear reference to where this is stated in core doctrine

You are not allowed to infer it from some talk given somewhere. Considering your postion on this, it must be in Gospel Principles, right?
 
once again, we must be a broken record with STM

Please provide a clear reference to where this is stated in core doctrine

You are not allowed to infer it from some talk given somewhere. Considering your postion on this, it must be in Gospel Principles, right?
lol…it would be easier if your church did not change doctrine everytime one of their doctrines was proven to be false or ridiculous…

but, I will start a new thread on this…will be easier…
 
No, no, no,
The LDS trinity doctrine comes from a different interpretation of the same Holy Scripture used by the Catholics to forumulate their trinity doctrine.
You have no argument from me about your view, because if you hold to your “opinion” then you admit the LDS trinity doctrine is “Heretical” if you are of the opinion that is takes it foundation from scripture and Apostolic Traditional teachings.

If the LDS position does not try and take a historical biblical interpretation of Trinity, then it does not fall into Heresy, but comes from another source outside biblical historical Apostolic Tradition and revelation from Jesus Christ himself.

In either case the LDS trinity position has no foundational teachings of Jesus and the apostles from scripture and Sacred Tradition taught and held by the Early Church Fathers, who later defended Jesus revelation of the blessed Trinity against all heretics and heresy’s and placed this apostolic teaching as dogma and never changing/ binding on all Christians since the early centuries.

LDS comes along 1900 years later and introduces and new revelation of the trinity? that has no roots to Apostolic times nor her teachings.

Peace be with you
 
Yes Rebecca,
I am a heretic per Rome
Easy enough to remedy. But I wasn’t speaking of you personally. I was speaking about Mormonism, ie, the doctrines. Not of individuals, whom God judges, not me.
 
QUOTE=Javl;7000533]Any organization or individual that borrows from, or uses, standard Christian thought or terminology to describe or discuss an idea similar to but different from the original meaning of that Christian thought, or understanding, is in heresy.
The Church of Latter-day Saints ( Mormon ) uses Christian terminology and ideas borrowed from Christianity which meanings are entirely different from that of Christianity. It is therefore heretical regardless of it source.
Would you call Gnostics, with their myriad of theories and theologies borrowed from Christianity, as Christians and non-heretical?
PAX DOMINI :signofcross:
Shalom Aleichem
Interesting thought; I was speaking from a Vatican quote on the LDS trinity doctrine. You have moved on to another topic here by introducing LDS terminology and ideas? One would have to take one by one to determine which has a Christian foundation leading to heresy, and those which do not have a Christian foundation are not heresy but another gospel from a foriegn source other than Jesus Christ and his Catholic church.

But I would call a hersey or heretic is one who removed his position from the Truth for another. If a Gnostic was a knowledgable Catholic prior to becoming a gnostic, then yes I would consider him/her a heretic. But if this Gnostic of no fault of their own was born into such teachings, this person does not qualify as a heretic, but one who follows heretical teachings if rooted in the Traditions of Christianity from Jesus and Apostles but changed or deny the revelation of the New Testament for another.

We must pay attention to Mother Church wise words they are very distinct, clear and peculiar in these dealings. Without the Church’s position and understanding can lead one into deep waters alone, thus we have Protestantism inventing the Catholic Teachings terminologies and teachings for themselves and or rejecting them from themselves.

Peace be with you
 
once again, we must be a broken record with STM

Please provide a clear reference to where this is stated in core doctrine

You are not allowed to infer it from some talk given somewhere. Considering your postion on this, it must be in Gospel Principles, right?
Sorry but LDS protestations that we are “not allowed to infer” ring a bit hollow considering all the "inferring done by LDS members on a recently closed thread.
 
Yes Rebecca,
I am a heretic per Rome
Not so Todd:confused: Are you a baptised, confirmed confessed Catholic at anytime? If you were and you know these 2000 year old biblical apostolic teachings and reject them, then you define your self as a heretic.

If non of the above applies, then rest assured you are not a heretic, being an LDS only makes you a non believer in the revelations and teachings of Jesus Christ from the first century. You maybe what the Indians were to the gospel before the Church evangelized them.
Peace be with you
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top