Ancestry.com and the Mormon Church

  • Thread starter Thread starter JustaServant
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
Your above statement simply shows you have missed almost everything **I have been trying to say. **

“There has been a great difficulty in getting anything into the heads of this generation. It has been like splitting hemlock knots with a corn-dodger for a wedge, and a pumpkin for a beetle.”
  • Joseph Smith
Which is…what? You cannot present any evidence?

It there was…you would have gladly presented it, isn’t it? Instead of resorting to this kind of statements?

Or would we need to have some kind of spiritual eyes? And I have always wondered…why is it that Mormons have these special kind of spiritual eyes, and rest of us catholics seem to not be able to acquire these?

Can you present any of the examples I asked in another post…which I repeat here:

Well…let us make it easy for you…show us something tangible with the comparable mormon equivalent:

The mormon equivalent of St. Francis of Assisi and Padre Pio with the Stigmata

An apparation of the any…comparable to Lourdes or Fatima

An incorruptible saint…like that of Catherine of Sienna, Catherine Laboure, Bernadette of Lourdes…

To make it easy…if Joseph Smith is really a beloved from God almight…similar to the saints above…his body should be incorrupted…so has his body been exhumed? Why don’t you show evidence of his incorruptibility?
 
Here are the words from HonoraDominum post #200, “So as a starting point to help me acknowledge the basic truth of the existence of Moroni, point me to one single viable provable historical evidence, be it archeological or otherwise, that proves beyond a shadow of a doubt that there actually was a Moroni at all.” Proof beyond a shadow of a doubt, seems pretty absolute to me.

Why do you say there is ZERO evidence. You might argue the point that there is no physical evidence but there is certainly written testimony. You may discount the testimony of the witnesses and the book itself but you cannot credibly say it does not exist.
True…I cannot say the book does not exist. But, you miss the point…perhaps intentionally as you have no real evidence.

The book means nothing. anyone can write a book. my point that you have dodged is that there is NO evidence to support that book. No cities, no archaeological evidence, no scientific evidence. In fact, the evidence seems to discount the Book of Mormon as anything other than what it is: a hodge podge of things taken from other sources.
 
Pure speculation about the Hill Cumorah Paul (albeit one that suits your belief).
Not true. LDS Prophets have been very clear about the Hill Cumprah. Either you trust your prophets or you don’t
 
40.png
Janderich:
Pure speculation about the Hill Cumorah Paul (albeit one that suits your belief).
Not true. LDS Prophets have been very clear about the Hill Cumorah. Either you trust your prophets or you don’t
To let all the Catholics reading this thread know what we’re talking about, here’s a basic intro to the Hill Cumorah. In the Book of Mormon, at the end anyway, there were two main groups, or tribes if you will, of people: The Nephites (the “white and delightsome” good guys) and the Lamanites, the Cain to the Nephite’s Abel if you will. They fought all the way from what has been theorized as Central or South America to a great and final battle, portrayed in the Book of Mormon in the book of, well Mormon (emphasis added):

Mormon, Chapter 6:1-6, 10-11

1 And now I finish my record concerning the adestruction of my people, the Nephites. And it came to pass that we did march forth before the Lamanites.

2 And I, Mormon, wrote an epistle unto the king of the Lamanites, and desired of him that he would grant unto us that we might gather together our people unto the land of Cumorah, by a hill which was called Cumorah, and there we could give them battle.

3 And it came to pass that the king of the Lamanites did grant unto me the thing which I desired.

4 And it came to pass that we did march forth to the land of Cumorah, and we did pitch our tents around about the hill Cumorah; and it was in a land of many waters, rivers, and fountains; and here we had hope to gain advantage over the Lamanites.

5 And when three hundred and eighty and four years had passed away, we had gathered in all the remainder of our people unto the land of Cumorah.

6 And it came to pass that when we had gathered in all our people in one to the land of Cumorah, behold I, Mormon, began to be old; and knowing it to be the last struggle of my people, and having been commanded of the Lord that I should not suffer the records which had been handed down by our fathers, which were asacred, to fall into the hands of the Lamanites, (for the Lamanites would destroy them) therefore I made this record out of the plates of Nephi, and hid up in the hill Cumorah all the records which had been entrusted to me by the hand of the Lord, save it were these few plates which I gave unto my son Moroni.



10 And it came to pass that my men were hewn down, yea, even my ten thousand who were with me, and I fell wounded in the midst; and they passed by me that they did not put an end to my life.

11 And when they had gone through and hewn down all my people save it were twenty and four of us, (among whom was my son Moroni) and we having survived the dead of our people, did behold on the morrow, when the Lamanites had returned unto their camps, from the top of the hill Cumorah, the ten thousand of my people who were hewn down, being led in the front by me.

This is why the ex-Mormons keep bringing this point up over and over, asking evidence. They assume that if 10,000 people died in a great battle, that there should be at least one small but “beyond a reasonable doubt” piece of archeological evidence that 10,000 people had been slain in a very small and very specific piece of land less than 1600 years ago. At the very least, we have asked for one piece of evidence that shows anything at all from the 2000+ years of civilization of the Jaredites or the 1000 years of history of the Nephites and Lamanites as described in the Book of Mormon. I mean, logically, you’d think that if a civilization ruled the land for 1000 years, there’d be at least one verifiable landmark, or language evidence, or something, right?

Right?

Our friend Janderich is claiming that the actual location of the Hill Cumorah is “pure speculation.” I cannot imagine that he was raised Mormon, or has ever actually done any kind of study into Mormon history at all, seeing as how this is the one piece of information that has been taught since literally the very first days of the church. However, don’t take my word for it - Google to the rescue! Here’s a quote from one of my very favorite “Come on, this guy can’t be serious” Mormon authors, courtesy of one of my favorite sites, MormonThink.com:
Both the Nephite and Jaredite civilizations fought their final great wars of extinction at or near the Hill Cumorah (or Ramah as the Jaredites termed it), which hill is located between Palmyra and Manchester in the western part of the state of New York.
  • Apostle Bruce R. McConkie, Mormon Doctrine, p. 175
And of course, we have this letter (courtesy of Utah Lighthouse Ministries):



Of course, you may not trust something that’s not a primary source, so here’s a few from official authorized church publications, courtesy of LDS.org (emphasis added):
… President Benson also visited the Hill Cumorah, where the Prophet Joseph Smith unearthed the golden plates from which the Book of Mormon was translated. President Benson attended the final performance of the 1986 Hill Cumorah Pageant August 2, and on Sunday morning, August 3, addressed a gathering estimated at more than fifteen thousand.
Zion on Zoar Road
BY RICHARD M. ROMNEY
‘New Era’ magazine, June 1981
Thousands of years ago, glaciers pulverized rocks and scooped through the landscape outside what is now Buffalo, New York. The ice rivers left behind a series of soft-shouldered mounds called drumlins, hills that are today rich in foliage and equally rich in memories. It was in one such hill many miles to the east, Cumorah, that Moroni buried the plates of gold. It was in 1820, in a grove surrounded by drumlins, that Joseph Smith kneeled in prayer.
 
Only the bulldozers can answer, none of us here.

Cumorah…sounds more Irish or Scottish to me…I was reading about King David last night in the Old Testament…and I did not see any lingual roots in the English pronunciation and script of ancient Hebrew names of cities, towns, settlements.

Took a graduate level course on Linguistics…

Don’t see any cultural or linguistic connection to the materials shown here on this thread either.
 
Doesn’t make sense either why Moroni would lead him out there…and now there is two places Smith could have been sent?

Why or how does this narrative fit in with the Bible?.. It seems the Mormon narrative is considered more of the truth than the Bible…or Jesus Christ…so such claims diminish Christ as savior and redeemer of the world…

Christ needs the Lamanites
 
For many years I have advocated the excavation of Cumorah…it is the ONLY location mentioned in the Book of Mormon we are sure about and yet the ONLY place they have not considered excavating.

I am telling you, it is THE proof that even the leaders of the LDS Church know it is false.
 
Considering all the excavation done in the Holy Land searching for ancient artifacts of faith, with the Mormon love its origins…you would think it would want to go back to this site to draw on the treasures of their origins.
 
Considering all the excavation done in the Holy Land searching for ancient artifacts of faith, with the Mormon love its origins…you would think it would want to go back to this site to draw on the treasures of their origins.
It is not just that. Imagine if they excavated and actually found evidence of all that is mentioned in Moroni. They could FINALLY have some concrete evidence to the Book of Mormon. Lots of folks would have to eat some crow…including me.
 
Not true. LDS Prophets have been very clear about the Hill Comorah. Either you trust your prophets or you don’t
I think you misunderstood me (a rather common occurrence on this thread). So let me detail it out…
This is the part that is pure speculation from Paul:
The GAs know that there is nothing to find there because the Book Of Mormon is fiction.
Here are the problems with this simple statement:
  1. GAs know there is nothing to find there: Unless Paul has talked to them personally or has a statement directly from them as to why they have decided not to dig there then, if he was being honest with himself, he must conclude that he does not know the reason.
  2. Book of Mormon is fiction: This is again opinion, perhaps Paul feels it is justified. The further assumption is that the apostles and general authorities know it is fiction and thus choose not to dig. This then would point to the fact that they lie regularly and often to misguide people.
At the end of the day Paul’s statement is a house of cards built around faulty assumptions. Even if you disagree with point #2, just take point #1 and anyone should be able to see that the logic is not sound. Paul’s comment does more to show his bias then it does actual fact.
 
I think you misunderstood me (a rather common occurrence on this thread). So let me detail it out…
This is the part that is pure speculation from Paul:

Here are the problems with this simple statement:
  1. GAs know there is nothing to find there: Unless Paul has talked to them personally or has a statement directly from them as to why they have decided not to dig there then, if he was being honest with himself, he must conclude that he does not know the reason.
Wrong. One can know the reason for something without talking to a person. For example, I go to a football game. I see a player on the sidelines in a cast. I know he will not play without ever talking to him or seeing a statement from him or the coach. Some things are so obvious, you just know. The lack of serious excavation at Cumorah is one of those things.
  1. Book of Mormon is fiction: This is again opinion, perhaps Paul feels it is justified. The further assumption is that the apostles and general authorities know it is fiction and thus choose not to dig. This then would point to the fact that they lie regularly and often to misguide people.
Again, not true. Since there has been exactly ZERO scientific or archaeological evidence to support the B of M, it actually is more likely than not that it is fiction. The Church risks too much to excavate there, so they don’t. It is that simple.

At the end of the day Paul’s statement is a house of cards built around faulty assumptions. Even if you disagree with point #2, just take point #1 and anyone should be able to see that the logic is not sound. Paul’s comment does more to show his bias then it does actual fact.

Actually, the only person here in a house of cards is you. You support a prophet who was a con man who spent his life running from the law and who cheated his people, cheated on his wife, and violated the constitution. You place your faith in a book with no scientific or archaeological evidence to support it. That is a far more flimsly house of cards than anything Paul has said.
 
Janderich, I have no wish to offend you. I have wished many, many times that the Church was true. I loved my mission. I loved being LDS. If it were true, I would gladly come back.

But it isn’t. And all my wishing will not make it so.
 
No doubt it would make my relationships with my family members better if I were LDS. Could never do it though, not even for them.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top