He obviously never interpreted this book in the Bible did he?.
"Genesis 19
1And there came two angels to Sodom at evening, and Lot sat in the gate of Sodom. And Lot, seeing them, rose up to meet them, and he bowed himself with his face toward the ground;
Yes indeed. ‘to know’ occurs about 800 time in the bible and only once does it refer to hoosex, if we believe that interpretation. Notice, by the way, all the women and children died too. Notice, by the way, that Lot offered WOMEN to the crown (not a Lot of point, if they are all homosexual).
Hmmm…lets check.
Isaiah 3.8,9 “For Jerusalem is ruined, and Judas is fallen: because their tongue and their doings are against the LORD, to provoke the eyes of his glory. The show of their countenance doth witness against them; and they declare their sin as Sodom, they hide it not. Woe unto their soul! for they have rewarded evil unto themselves.”
Not specified sin, rhetorical. Cant b used.
Jeremiah 23.14 “I have seen also in the prophets of Jerusalem an horrible thing: they commit adultery, and walk in lies: they strengthen also the hands of evildoers, that none doth return from his wickedness: they are all of them unto me as Sodom, and the inhabitants thereof as Gomorrah.”
No mention of hoomosexuality…adultery yes, lies, yes. Not homosex.
Eze. 16.49, 50 “Behold, this was the iniquity of thy sister Sodom, pride, fullness of bread, and abundance of idleness was in her and in her daughters, neither did she strengthen the hand of the poor and needy. And they were haughty, and committed abomination before me: therefore I took them away as I saw good.”
Lets see…pride, idleness, lack or cahrity, haughty…And the ‘abominations’ are not specified. Can’t use tha.
Luke 17.26 - 29 “And as it was in the days of Noah, so shall it be also in the days of the Son of man. They did eat, they drank, they married wives, they were given in marriage, until the day that Noah entered into the ark, and the flood came, and destroyed them all. Likewise also as it was in the days of Lot; they did eat, they drank, they bought, they sold, they planted, they built. But the same day that Lot went out of Sodom it rained fire and brimstone from heaven, and destroyed them all.”
Nope, no mention of homosexuality there.
Jude 1.4, 7, 8 “For there are certain men crept in unawares, who were before of old ordained to this condemnation, ungodly men, turning the grace of our God into lasciviousness, and denying the only Lord God, and our Lord Jesus Christ. Even as Sodom and Gomorrah, and the cities about them in like manner, giving themselves over to fornication, and going after strange flesh, are set forth for an example, suffering the vengeance of eternal fire. Likewise also these filthy dreamers defile the flesh, despise dominion, and speak evil of dignities.”
Better, but not brilliant. lasciviousness, isnt homosexuality specific, denying the only Lord God—idolotry a great abomination (ahhhh, a previous verse makes sense). fornication…not homosexual specific, ‘and going after strange flesh’, might mean homosexuality, but might mean ‘interested in angels’ or might be about coveting a neighbours ***.
And they say bad things.
Hmmm, interesting, and it certainly doesnt support an anti-gay stance.
Anti-rape, perhaps
Anti-idolitry,
Anti-idleness…
But nothing that explicitly say homosexuality.
By the way, I always thought angels were asexual. Why assume they were men?