Animal Rights

  • Thread starter Thread starter Holly3278
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
nobody can or will ban beef. giving animals protection against cruelty is not about banning meat. it is not about elevating animals to human dignity - it is about elevating humans to the compassionate morality we are called to have.

large scale livestock farming (“CAFOs”) do NOT help the land, they create biohazards, pollute the air and water, and are opposed by every small farming community in the areas where they crop up.

and what does sugar consumption have to do with animal rights? :confused:
There truly are economic reasons for all these corn products. Corn syrup is used in almost all processed foods and it is responsible for a lot of illness and obesity in people. Now they are trying to use corn for biodiesel.

Corn and soy products are mainly produced from genetically engineered crops. Corn and soy are among the most genetically engineered crops in the world. Buy local and don’t buy processed foods!!
 
There truly are economic reasons for all these corn products. Corn syrup is used in almost all processed foods and it is responsible for a lot of illness and obesity in people. Now they are trying to use corn for biodiesel.

Corn and soy products are mainly produced from genetically engineered crops. Corn and soy are among the most genetically engineered crops in the world. Buy local and don’t buy processed foods!!
i agree - i avoid high fructose corn syrup and other processed sugars like the plague. ask that one guy, he has to suffer through the obsessive/compulsive label reading i do at the supermarket 😉 i check sodium and processed sugar… all of these things.

i guess i’m just not seeing the connection between corn syrup, diabetes, and the problem of cruelty to farmed animals :confused:
 
i guess i’m just not seeing the connection between corn syrup, diabetes, and the problem of cruelty to farmed animals :confused:
That’s because it’s a Straw man argument; Sam Maloney says
What will become of the land? Instead of being used for eco-friendly grazing, it will turn into more cultivated, pesticide and insectcide drenched land devoid of natural life to provide you with more high-fructose corn syrup and a diabetes inducing high carb diet.
It could also be a False Dichotomy fallacy; Either raise beef cattle, or grow corn for syrup and get diabetes.
 
That’s because it’s a Straw man argument; Sam Maloney says

It could also be a False Dichotomy fallacy; Either raise beef cattle, or grow corn for syrup and get diabetes.
:doh2:

ok, i guess i get it. 🤷 😉
 
I am for animal rights, but against PETA.

PETA is against two groups of which I have been in since a young child. FFA and 4-H.

Future Farmers of America, I have been in for 2 years, and will be in it till I am probably dead.
4-H, I have been in for 4 years.
 
giving animals protection against cruelty is not about banning meat. it is not about elevating animals to human dignity - it is about elevating humans to the compassionate morality we are called to have.
Well put.

That may mean that some farming methods have to go - eg chickens living their short lives in cages or in huge barns.

It also means that animals kept as companions are able to be cats and dogs and get to run around and not be treated as living dolls always dressed up to the nines.

Coats for small vulnerable dogs, and working dogs like guide dogs, on cold winter days are fine. Also when they need protection from the sun. In other words, it’s their need nor our desire that should be the determinant in these situations.
 
Also, I would never hurt my cows, but they are meat cows. Which when this year’s calves come in, we are gonna sell any boys, and they will be eaten, so we can pay for keeping the girls.
 
Well put.

That may mean that some farming methods have to go - eg chickens living their short lives in cages or in huge barns.

It also means that animals kept as companions are able to be cats and dogs and get to run around and not be treated as living dolls always dressed up to the nines.

Coats for small vulnerable dogs, and working dogs like guide dogs, on cold winter days are fine. Also when they need protection from the sun.
LOL yup, even as an animal lover, i have to say people do sometimes go to extremes with dogs and cats. ok if you want to buy a halloween costume for example, find a needy family with small children and give them some costumes… dogs and cats do NOT want or need them :rolleyes:
 
Also, I would never hurt my cows, but they are meat cows. Which when this year’s calves come in, we are gonna sell any boys, and they will be eaten, so we can pay for keeping the girls.
why do you sell the male calves and keep the females if they are all meat cows?

(it’s a sincere question, i honestly don’t know 😊 )
 
why do you sell the male calves and keep the females if they are all meat cows?

(it’s a sincere question, i honestly don’t know 😊 )
Any male bull can take care of over 10 cows (I have heard of them giving like 100 to one bull, but I’d prefer to keep it at 1 bull, 35 cows) We already have a bull, and under the average limit of cows, so we do not need a bull anymore, so we sell them, since we have no need for them.
 
I think I have been less than charitable on the various animal suffering threads. I apologize if I antagonized anyone. I tend to get carried away when it comes to animal suffering.

Let me also make a blanket apology for any other posts where it appeared that I was taking delight in pointing out logical fallacies, or where my comments reeked of sarcasm.

sorry.
😊
 
I think I have been less than charitable on the various animal suffering threads. I apologize if I antagonized anyone. I tend to get carried away when it comes to animal suffering.

Let me also make a blanket apology for any other posts where it appeared that I was taking delight in pointing out logical fallacies, or where my comments reeked of sarcasm.

sorry.
😊
me too.It’s easy to get carried away on certain subjects
😊
 
It could also be a False Dichotomy fallacy; Either raise beef cattle, or grow corn for syrup and get diabetes.
It’s not a false dichotomy: I own land. I get to choose whether to produce protein, or carbs. I choose to produce protein.

Clear enough?
 
I get angry too-- VERY.

Because people who have never worked with or around animals count on PETA [or ‘news’ reports based on PETA press releases] for virtually all their information about animal agriculture.

And these nice folks who’ve never milked a cow or trained a horse want to write the regs about how much room my animals need, how often they should be fed, at what temperature they need heated shelter…

I don’t need PETA to tell me how to care for animals. I’ve given my entire working life to them, lost sleep, lost blood, broken bones, broken my heart more times than I can count on behalf of the animals in my care. I promise you, no one has suffered more on their behalf or shed more tears for any un-needed suffering.

But people need food. And grazing animals do the least harm to the natural world of any means of extracting calories for human use. Fewer chemicals are used, less soil is eroded, more diversity sustained. My ranch is home to animal species most of you will never see in the wild: Big horn sheep, gray wolf, mountain lion, grizzley bear-- they can’t, don’t exist in cultivated fields.

But I’m the monster-- I eat meat, produce it for others. You may not feel that way, but PETA does, and yet you defend them and defend them, praise them for their alleged good deeds, and accept every claim they make as though it’s Gospel.

Because your pals at PETA know waaaaay more about these issues than someone whose worked in the business for 30 years. And nothing I can say will convince you otherwise: I have a vested interest, unlike those secular saints and their 17 million dollars a year in donations.

Use them as a ‘means to an end’ to expose the evils of agriculture? Yeah, that’s what the German aristocrats had in mind for the Nazis: use them to get rid of the communists, then kick them out. Great plan, there.

Overstatement? Nothing I can say about PETA is close to as bad as what they are already saying about me. They’d take my animals, if they could. I’d rather they took my life. Those are the stakes, for me: my life, versus the emotional well being of the chickens you champion.

But every time nutrition comes up, your favorite villian isn’t corn syrup, it’s the Big Mac.

And not because it contains high frutose corn syrup.
 
I get angry too-- VERY.

Because people who have never worked with or around animals count on PETA [or ‘news’ reports based on PETA press releases] for virtually all their information about animal agriculture.

And these nice folks who’ve never milked a cow or trained a horse want to write the regs about how much room my animals need, how often they should be fed, at what temperature they need heated shelter…

I don’t need PETA to tell me how to care for animals. I’ve given my entire working life to them, lost sleep, lost blood, broken bones, broken my heart more times than I can count on behalf of the animals in my care. I promise you, no one has suffered more on their behalf or shed more tears for any un-needed suffering.

But people need food. And grazing animals do the least harm to the natural world of any means of extracting calories for human use. Fewer chemicals are used, less soil is eroded, more diversity sustained. My ranch is home to animal species most of you will never see in the wild: Big horn sheep, gray wolf, mountain lion, grizzley bear-- they can’t, don’t exist in cultivated fields.

But I’m the monster-- I eat meat, produce it for others. You may not feel that way, but PETA does, and yet you defend them and defend them, praise them for their alleged good deeds, and accept every claim they make as though it’s Gospel.

Because your pals at PETA know waaaaay more about these issues than someone whose worked in the business for 30 years. And nothing I can say will convince you otherwise: I have a vested interest, unlike those secular saints and their 17 million dollars a year in donations.

Use them as a ‘means to an end’ to expose the evils of agriculture? Yeah, that’s what the German aristocrats had in mind for the Nazis: use them to get rid of the communists, then kick them out. Great plan, there.

Overstatement? Nothing I can say about PETA is close to as bad as what they are already saying about me. They’d take my animals, if they could. I’d rather they took my life. Those are the stakes, for me: my life, versus the emotional well being of the chickens you champion.

But every time nutrition comes up, your favorite villian isn’t corn syrup, it’s the Big Mac.

And not because it contains high frutose corn syrup.
Who exactly are you talking too in this? I didn’t see anyone you quoting over.

I raise beef cows, but I have never had PETA get after me, but my ag teacher did warn me about them. I think their crazy to begin with cause I seen on their page about being against Fishing. That is one of my favorite things, so I am really, to be honest, Anti-PETA, cause they are Anti-FFA/4-H.

I had to do a report on groups like that for my Small Animal Care class, he wanted us to know of them just in-case anything happened. I had to do a report on the two groups:

ALF- Animal Liberation Front
ELF- I think it was Enviromnental Liberation Front, forgot what the E stood for to be honest.

I do not think anyone can tell me how to raise my cattle better then my family cause they’ve been doing it for generations, so I usually take little heed to other people telling me what to do.
 
I would be willing to bet that the vandals and murderers who broke into the “dog house on haunted hill” were not really PETA.I’m not defending all of PETAs activities.But,PETA is a much more public group than the Animal Liberation Front,who must do their nasty deeds in secret because they are evil.It also wouldn’t surprise me if these people were deliberately trying to paint PETA as evil by committing this atrocity in their name.
Oh, PETA is actually very happy to claim credit for all this stuff. They say that everybody who works there is :eek: “no better than a Nazi”. (So that part was no surprise to me!!
I am for animal rights, but against PETA.

PETA is against two groups of which I have been in since a young child. FFA and 4-H.

Future Farmers of America, I have been in for 2 years, and will be in it till I am probably dead.
4-H, I have been in for 4 years.
Also, I would never hurt my cows, but they are meat cows. Which when this year’s calves come in, we are gonna sell any boys, and they will be eaten, so we can pay for keeping the girls.
I don’t think, actually, that PETA cares about animals. They just want to get on the evening news.
You all who are raising animals with proper care, get dragged into the mix with somebody who is torturing animals, which is an outrage!! Thats the trouble with extremists of many kinds: They make wild blanket statements about things they are ignorant about.
 
I do not think anyone can tell me how to raise my cattle better then my family cause they’ve been doing it for generations, so I usually take little heed to other people telling me what to do.
LOL… one of my greatest ironies is that a good friend of mine is now very actively involved in PETA, and my grandfather was a huge cattle rancher. While I sympathize with their position against the cruelty of animals, I think that many of their positions are tremendously over the top, to the point that I cannot support them.

Now, with regard to your cattle, any respectable farmer or rancher would at least listen to the advice of other farmers and ranchers. It was that type of attitude that kept the French from adopting the potato for 100 years longer than the rest of Europe! The French didn’t want anyone telling them how to do things, and yet other farmers in other countries kept telling them after the discovery of the New World (from where potatoes come from) that they were super-nutritious, and you could grow enough to keep a family alive for a year in just 1 acre of land (compared to 14 acres for wheat). The food would have literally stopped most starvation in France in the 1600s, and yet, they were terrified of adopting them. It’s good to at least give arguments a fair chance, and if they convince you, then you adopt them. Only a fool is completely inflexible.
 
I get angry too-- VERY.

Because people who have never worked with or around animals count on PETA [or ‘news’ reports based on PETA press releases] for virtually all their information about animal agriculture.
it’s not more credible to automatically deny their reports than to automatically accept them. i don’t believe that the videos they make are forgeries. they do depict depravity and cruelty. i refuse to support that.
And these nice folks who’ve never milked a cow or trained a horse want to write the regs about how much room my animals need, how often they should be fed, at what temperature they need heated shelter…
i’ve never milked a cow but i can see that injecting them with rBST to make them produce more milk than nature intended is making them suffer. i can vouch for the pain of mastitis, which is what so many dairy cows suffer from as a result of over-producing milk. it also doesn’t take a knowlege of animal husbandry to see that when you artifically impregnate cows over and over more than nature intended, you will harm the cow. or that if you take a newborn away from almost any mammal that is designed to care for them, it will be incredibly distressing for them.
I don’t need PETA to tell me how to care for animals. I’ve given my entire working life to them, lost sleep, lost blood, broken bones, broken my heart more times than I can count on behalf of the animals in my care. I promise you, no one has suffered more on their behalf or shed more tears for any un-needed suffering.
likewise i don’t need dairy farmers to tell me that their cows don’t suffer when they have mastitis, are inseminated beyond the capacity of their bodies, and have their young taken away from them so that WE can have the milk that nature provided for that offspring.
But people need food. And grazing animals do the least harm to the natural world of any means of extracting calories for human use. Fewer chemicals are used, less soil is eroded, more diversity sustained. My ranch is home to animal species most of you will never see in the wild: Big horn sheep, gray wolf, mountain lion, grizzley bear-- they can’t, don’t exist in cultivated fields.
obviously you are a good steward of the land and animals that you keep. that’s awesome. i do not believe that grazing animals does the least harm to the environment based on what i’ve learned (and not from PETA), but in numbers of animals that the land can sustain, it’s reasonable. commendable too that you don’t automatically trap and shoot wild wolves and other predators - because many cattle ranchers do.

btw you are not producing any food that i need, so be careful about saying that beef is “necessary” – i’ve been swallowing that garbage all my life until i learned better (pun intended). so if you want to talk about propaganda, let’s also talk about what dairy, meat, and egg associations LIE to the public about.
But I’m the monster-- I eat meat, produce it for others. You may not feel that way, but PETA does, and yet you defend them and defend them, praise them for their alleged good deeds, and accept every claim they make as though it’s Gospel.
again, you automatically deny every claim they make. you are no better than people who automatically believe ever claim they make.
Because your pals at PETA know waaaaay more about these issues than someone whose worked in the business for 30 years. And nothing I can say will convince you otherwise: I have a vested interest, unlike those secular saints and their 17 million dollars a year in donations.
that’s like saying a person has to be a parent in order to identify child abuse.

and i’ll see your 17 million that peta gets and raise you the multi-BILLIONS made by factory farming. it seems like you don’t realize what kind of goliath these animal activists are taking on.
Use them as a ‘means to an end’ to expose the evils of agriculture? Yeah, that’s what the German aristocrats had in mind for the Nazis: use them to get rid of the communists, then kick them out. Great plan, there.
see i don’t get this. if someone says that factory farms are like concentration camps for animals (and they ARE), we get in trouble for saying agribusiness is like nazis. but then they say that peta is like nazis. 🤷
Overstatement? Nothing I can say about PETA is close to as bad as what they are already saying about me. They’d take my animals, if they could. I’d rather they took my life. Those are the stakes, for me: my life, versus the emotional well being of the chickens you champion.
real farming, as it was some 50-60 years ago is not the complaint. but there are two serious sins driving factory farming (again if that doesn’t describe you, then don’t go into the defensive crouch):
corporations are greedy and americans are gluttonous. corporations and the people who drive their business do not care what effect their products and consumption of them does to the rest of the world. it’s all about “me” - MY choice to eat meat, as much as i want, and i don’t think i should have to pay much for it.

and to that i say, ok… but those who want that should have to be responsible for it. whether i eat meat or not, i am susceptible to the antibiotic-resistant bacteria and viruses that are being created by factory farming. i need to drink the water and breathe air too so let’s keep the billions of tons of animal poop and noxious fumes out of those things. and away from my tomatoes, peppers, spinach, and tahini. i think that’s fair enough, don’t you?
But every time nutrition comes up, your favorite villian isn’t corn syrup, it’s the Big Mac.

And not because it contains high frutose corn syrup.
oh but you’re wrong. corn syrup is my arch nemesis :cool:
 
From The Catholic Sun
A paper from my old diocese

catholicsun.org/2006/june15/local/humaneanimals.html

“These are really smart animals, they aren’t stupid animals by any stretch,” she said. “They literally spend their life in these cages that are the size of their body. They can’t turn, they can’t stretch, they can’t move and they basically go into all these kind of aggressive psychotic behaviors and they live their whole lives that way.”
 
LOL… one of my greatest ironies is that a good friend of mine is now very actively involved in PETA, and my grandfather was a huge cattle rancher. While I sympathize with their position against the cruelty of animals, I think that many of their positions are tremendously over the top, to the point that I cannot support them.

Now, with regard to your cattle, any respectable farmer or rancher would at least listen to the advice of other farmers and ranchers. It was that type of attitude that kept the French from adopting the potato for 100 years longer than the rest of Europe! The French didn’t want anyone telling them how to do things, and yet other farmers in other countries kept telling them after the discovery of the New World (from where potatoes come from) that they were super-nutritious, and you could grow enough to keep a family alive for a year in just 1 acre of land (compared to 14 acres for wheat). The food would have literally stopped most starvation in France in the 1600s, and yet, they were terrified of adopting them. It’s good to at least give arguments a fair chance, and if they convince you, then you adopt them. Only a fool is completely inflexible.
I would listen to anyone in my family cause they are farmers. If I knew the other family, maybe, but usually they don’t know much of anything that I don’t, they might think they do.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top