T
That_one_guy
Guest
So,what do we do?
Do about what? The police? The whiners?So,what do we do?![]()
yes⌠i think itâs also in enforcement. it was a sad shame that the HSUS had to expose the cruelty at the chino slaughterhouse when the USDA goes around assuring people that these places are held to standardsDo about what? The police? The whiners?![]()
![]()
Actually, first things first, all the animal welfare groups need to get together and get on the same page. Then find out which state agency oversees animal welfare. In Iowa it is the Department of Agriculture. After that, make a real pain in the but of yourself to state legislature and the agency overseeing animal welfare. Law enforcement has their hands tied regarding what they can do depending on the laws of the state. Those laws probably need to be changed and updated and an organization of an agency whose sole purpose is animal welfare. In Iowa, the Department of Agriculture has far too much to do to be able to spend much time and resourses on animals. They arenât a high priority. We need to keep at the legislature to fix the problem, not apply a bandaid and people like PETA need to get realistic and spend their energy on the people that can actually make the changes and not tying up valuable but inappropriate resourses.
**
The real problem is in the laws and the punishment for violators.**
You may want to read all of my post if you are talking about sheriff departments and police department. The USDA does not have the time nor the resources to do all of the overseeing themselves, they rely on state agencies and the state laws differ from state to state, most of which are obsolete and extremely vague.yes⌠i think itâs also in enforcement. it was a sad shame that the HSUS had to expose the cruelty at the chino slaughterhouse when the USDA goes around assuring people that these places are held to standards![]()
So,who is to fill in this spot? Is there not a place for concerned citizens?Code:The USDA does not have the time nor the resources to do all of the overseeing themselves, they rely on state agencies and the state laws differ from state to state, most of which are obsolete and extremely vague
The norm or the exception is not the issue.The issue is that it happens at all.Sort of like the child abuse at the hands of our priests thing.One bad apple donât spoil the whole bunch,as they say.But,still,âŚwe need to get rid of the bad apples.Also keep in mind that the slaughter house in Chino and the hog production farm in Greene County, Iowa are not the norm but the exceptions.
Who are we supposed to listen to?Who is going to speak out against the abuse?Do we just sit around and hope for change like the Obama slogan said?Whatever you do, DONâT LISTEN TO PETA, THEY ARE WAYYYYYYYYY OVER THE EDGE.
if the USDA cannot manage their job, they need to give that aspect of it to someone who can and will. that is what bothers me.You may want to read all of my post if you are talking about sheriff departments and police department. The USDA does not have the time nor the resources to do all of the overseeing themselves, they rely on state agencies and the state laws differ from state to state, most of which are obsolete and extremely vague.
Also keep in mind that the slaughter house in Chino and the hog production farm in Greene County, Iowa are not the norm but the exceptions. Whatever you do, DONâT LISTEN TO PETA, THEY ARE WAYYYYYYYYY OVER THE EDGE.
So,who is to fill in this spot? Is there not a place for concerned citizens?
thank you for explaining this - i didnât realize they were hindering their own causes.Unfortunately, if you live in a state that doesnât have an ASPCA or Humane Society, like Iowa, (yes, itâs amazing isnât it) your choices are limited. You can call the Sheriffâs office or the Police Department and they will investigate it but keep in mind there are many deputies and officers who donât really know what to look for in neglect cases. Abuse cases are a little easer to spot but not always easy to prove and, with law enforcement, they HAVE to prove it to the County Attorney who has to prove it to a magistrate who then decided if the charges are warranted and what the bond, if any will be.
Yes, get rid of the bad apples but make sure they are bad before you throw them out and donât bruise the rest in the process (Sorry, another passion of mine after seeing so many falsely accused but that is in another thread) While I agree that even once is one time too many, it doesnât help when the penalty is the same as writing a bad check or calling someone a name.
For heavenâs sake, donât just sit there waiting for something to change. (and, no, I did not vote for Obama. Iâm not excited about the changes he proposes, i.e lifting restrictions on abortions, etcâŚ) Thatâs why I said, at the beginning of my additions to this thread, all of the animal welfare groups in the state need to first get together and make sure they are all on the same page. Lobby legislators to change the laws, volunteer to âtriageâ complaints for the overseeing agency according to each individualâs specialty and then pass the information on to the appropriate agency so the proper action can be taken. I occasionally will check out complaints given to me and then take the information to work. Then, most importantly, be patient. Let the legal system do itâs job in proscuting the offenders. If you have judges that trivialize these cases time and time again, vote or petition to have them removed. If they are trivializing animal neglect/abuse cases they are probably trivializing neglect/abuse of people and other crimes that affect society.
Now, for cathybramble, I didnât say PETA makes thing up. What I said was that, from experience, they break too many moral and civil laws. Most of the video tapes they post to their website cannot be used in court because they were obtained illegally and they know it. They use the tapes to agitate the public which isnât fixing the problem. Then the Sheriffâs office gets hundreds of phone calls from around the country wanting to know why people havenât been arrested, why hasnât the facility been closed, etc⌠all before the first 24 hours of the investigation are up and taking time away from the investigation. PETA also tends to make those investigations more difficult than helping resolve the issue. There is a right way of doing things and there is a wrong way. I donât have a problem with any other group.
My ducks and goose got a lot of featherâs, so theyâre ready for the cold. One thing that I do have to watch, is the ice though. They rely on me to break it for them when it gets well below freezing.oh yes.But,this is off topic.So,everybody take your animals inside.If you live near me or Cathy.I donât care if they are born with fur coats.Itâs cold out there!!!![]()
i donât see that animals have more rights than people. sex offenders are people, so they have rights to be let out as the law allows (not saying itâs always moral, but they have those rights). i have never heard of someone going to prison for life for having 35 dogs. can you post a link to where you read this?Ok I love Animals, Donât get me wrong but sometimes I feel that Animals have more rights then the unborn children and even more rights then humans we have sex offenders let out on parole and yet we have someone who had 35 dogs taken to prison for life. I donât undersand can anyone explain this to meâŚ
Faustina
They donât get frozen in the water do they? That would really stink.My ducks and goose got a lot of featherâs, so theyâre ready for the cold. One thing that I do have to watch, is the ice though. They rely on me to break it for them when it gets well below freezing.
Youâre right. As I have said before, if you follow the CCC you canât go wrong. (this is where the âbutâ comes in) Do you realize how many people donât know what the CCC is or what it teaches? Do you realize how many Catholics donât know there are teachings in the CCC on how to be a good steward of the creation God has given us. That is where it is important that we, as GOOD Catholic have to work with others in educating them and protecting Godâs creation. It really isnât about animal ârightsâ (that really isnât quite the right word) but that none of Gods creatures should be abused or neglected. And then there are those who donât care and get lots of excitement and personal gratification from the pain of others, animal or human. These are the people it is most important to protect against since studies have shown that a person who will abuse or neglect an animal (especially a pet) will probably abuse, neglect, assault, or kill people around them.I believe that the CCC speaks clearly on this subject. Someone posted directly from the CCCC on an earlier post.
From my point of view is not so much whether animals have more rights than people or whether there should be organizations to protect animals. If Iâm reading the CCC correctly, itâs really about our duties as stewards of creation.
We have a duty to other living things to make sure that they are treated with kindness, humanely and are not abused. In other words, we cannot be indifferent to the created world, including animals. If there are organizations that promote good stewardship, then we should support their efforts.
Even the Holy Father allows cats to live in his private home.
JR![]()
unfortunately, many people see this as carte blanche to stuff as many sick animals into a shed as possible, castrated and de-beaked needlessly, and pump them full of chemicals. we have turkeys that are bred so large and âmeatyâ that they canât breed on their own. we inseminate dairy cows (and inject them full of hormones) to make them produce as much milk as possible, and throw their babies (who never actually get to suckle the milk that God intended for them) away like trash â and then wonder why we humans can so callously justify killing our own unborn. we have reduced the miracle and wonder of reproduction to a mechanical process or a means to an end. those who do not see the connection are blinded by their gluttony.Genesis 1 : 26 - 31
26 Then God said: âLet us make man in our image, after our likeness. Let them have dominion over the fish of the sea, the birds of the air, and the cattle, and over all the wild animals and all the creatures that crawl on the ground.â
27 God created man in his image; in the divine image he created him; male and female he created them.
28 God blessed them, saying: âBe fertile and multiply; fill the earth and subdue it. Have dominion over the fish of the sea, the birds of the air, and all the living things that move on the earth.â
29 God also said: âSee, I give you every seed-bearing plant all over the earth and every tree that has seed-bearing fruit on it to be your food;
30 and to all the animals of the land, all the birds of the air, and all the living creatures that crawl on the ground, I give all the green plants for food.â And so it happened.
31 God looked at everything he had made, and he found it very good. Evening came, and morning followedâthe sixth day.
Genesis 9 : 1 - 3
1 God blessed Noah and his sons and said to them: "Be fertile and multiply and fill the earth.
2 Dread fear of you shall come upon all the animals of the earth and all the birds of the air, upon all the creatures that move about on the ground and all the fishes of the sea; into your power they are delivered.
**3 Every creature that is alive shall be yours to eat; I give them all to you as I did the green plants. ** :twocents:npatrol:
With all due respect,sir,âŚI will say this one more time.
It is not about whether you are allowed to eat meat or not.It is about the ethical treatment of animals.
Just because there is evidence to support the claim that humans were not designed to eat meat,âŚand just because there are many of us who choose not to eat meat,âŚthis does not mean that YOU should not eat meat.If it bugs you so much,maybe there is a subconscious issue of guilt.I donât know.Do it for lent.
I donât care if you eat meat.If you can raise pigs and cattle and turkeys and chickens,etc. for food,in an ETHICAL AND HUMANE fashion, then please do.
Most animal lovers donât care if you eat meat.kpeople: Just DO NOT BE CRUEL TO THE LIVESTOCK!!!
The above is a good point.I believe that the CCC speaks clearly on this subject. Someone posted directly from the CCCC on an earlier post.
From my point of view is not so much whether animals have more rights than people or whether there should be organizations to protect animals. If Iâm reading the CCC correctly, itâs really about our duties as stewards of creation.
We have a duty to other living things to make sure that they are treated with kindness, humanely and are not abused. In other words, we cannot be indifferent to the created world, including animals. If there are organizations that promote good stewardship, then we should support their efforts.
Even the Holy Father allows cats to live in his private home.
JR![]()
This is why the CCC quotes saints like Francis of Assisi, because they understood that we have a moral obligation to treat all of creation as God intended and to love it as God loves it. We all come from the hand of the same Creator. Therefore, we have an obligation to act morally toward all creation and exercise proper stewardship, without cruelty.The above is a good point.
Now I donât know whether animals have rights or not. It doesnât matter, however, because in general animals do not have the ability to enforce their rights if they have them.
So, the real question is not what rights animals have, but rather, what duties do we have towards animals?
We should take care of our household pets,no doubt.Those who choose to eat animals should try to ensure that the(ugh)food they purchase is from a place that raises their animals organically and kills them in as humane a fashion as possible.With clean living conditions.So, the real question is not what rights animals have, but rather, what duties do we have towards animals?