F
forgetmenot
Guest
Thank you. I understand what you’re saying. I am very emotionally involved in this. I understand what you mean about presumptions; my intent was to say that what we thought was written was not read within the meaning of how it was written. The words were read differently. I am not asking for the Tribunal to read something not there. They used the words “Family tales” re: witness statements. Why would more than one person write the same thing under oath? Unfortunately, his witnesses are limited and are family. Twice within the verdict the same wrong dates were given: one by the defender and one by the judge. The dates were for the time period they had known each other, extending the time period to almost a year before they were engaged. In actuality, they knew each other less than six months before they were engaged. This was quite clear in the application. The result of this error suggests they knew each other almost a year and a half pre-engagement instead of less than six months. I suggested to my spouse that maybe he should’ve appealed just based on this information, but he felt that this alone would probably not carry any weight. I don’t know. All I know is it’s gonna take someone with some very strong writing skills and knowledge - a Canon lawyer - to get this in correctly, as Chevalier suggested often. I don’t know if I regret him not appealing, I don’t know if these errors alone are good enough to overturn a verdict. The trauma of the verdict coming at the same time as a cancer diagnosis was too much for he and I to handle at that time, and it is still difficult. Fortunately, the prognosis is very good, though he can’t get into writing with what is on his plate right now. I want everyone to know that sharing thoughts, suggestions, has been very much appreciated.