Answer to this objection

  • Thread starter Thread starter Upgrade25
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
U

Upgrade25

Guest
The ‘12 year old was raped and will die if she has the baby’ argument is used by pro-Death people across the world. It is used to intimidate pro-Lifers and make them feel like they are sacrificing a more viable life for a baby that may not even survive. It was used on me, and I would like to know how to respond.

Pax,
Upgrade
 
Upgrade25 said:
The ‘12 year old was raped and will die if she has the baby’ argument is used by pro-Death people across the world. It is used to intimidate pro-Lifers and make them feel like they are sacrificing a more viable life for a baby that may not even survive. It was used on me, and I would like to know how to respond.

Pax,
Upgrade
Click to expand...
With advances in medical science, “she will die if she has the baby” is just wishful thinking.on the part of the pro-abort industry and radical feminists, most of whom do not know enough obstetrics to fill a gnat’s ear.

Over half a century ago, in Peru, a girl aged 6 (!!!) was delivered of a male baby by Caesarean, conceived as the result of a sexual assault (the offender was never traced).

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lina_Medina

Moreover, those who use this argument are being disingenuous, because “12-year-old rape victims” form only a minuscule fraction of abortions actually being performed. The vast majority entail little or no risk to the mother’s physical or mental health (in fact, abortion has well-established mental health hazards which the APA has tried hard to bury), and are the result of social and cultural “values” that either compel a vulnerable woman to end her child’s life, or poison a mother’s mind and lead her to believe that motherhood is “beneath her” and that a child is an “inconvenience” rather than a gift. 😦
 
Thank you Deacon Jeff. That was by far the best answer I have read regarding this issue.
 
Upgrade25 said:
The ‘12 year old was raped and will die if she has the baby’ argument is used by pro-Death people across the world. It is used to intimidate pro-Lifers and make them feel like they are sacrificing a more viable life for a baby that may not even survive. It was used on me, and I would like to know how to respond.

Pax,
Upgrade
Click to expand...
What has the baby done to merit the death penalty?
 
The objection was brought to me that carrying the child would be ‘too much’ for a twelve year old mentally, physically, and emotionally. Maybe not to death, but to being hurt and having you’re mind messed up for the rest of your life.
 
Upgrade25 said:
The objection was brought to me that carrying the child would be ‘too much’ for a twelve year old mentally, physically, and emotionally. Maybe not to death, but to being hurt and having you’re mind messed up for the rest of your life.
Click to expand...
I think the problem is people seeing pre-born babies as somehow less “people” than their mothers.

If you have the choice between something that will harm a 12-year-old mentally, physically, and emotionally (assuming that is a given, which it is not), and something that will kill a 1-year-old, does anyone have a problem figuring out which to choose?

There is really no difference. A person’s size and location does not make him or her less of a person.

–Jen
 
Upgrade25 said:
The objection was brought to me that carrying the child would be ‘too much’ for a twelve year old mentally, physically, and emotionally. Maybe not to death, but to being hurt and having you’re mind messed up for the rest of your life.
Click to expand...
Killing your own child in the womb is enough to mess up your mind for the rest of your life.

postabortionsyndrome.org/
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top