M
Fair enough. It’s just that I see many Orthodox Jews who disagree with the secular Zionists who do not believe in the Torah, and are behind the State of Israel. According to the Rabbis, the Zionists use the Jewish religion as an excuse to carve out state while plundering and destroying the lives of others in the region. That is the point that is made by Miko Peled and the Orthodox Rabbis protesting the State of Israel. I was just wondering your view on the matter.God gave us the Land of Israel as an eternal inheritance and we have the right to live in it. This man doesn’t believe in Torah, in any case. . . I’m not interested in debating the Palestine issue.
I look at it from the point of view of realpolitik. The last “carving out” that was done was in 1967. No territory has been conquered in 50 years. Whether or not Israel could have, would have, should have done differently or acted exactly as it did in 1967 is not personally relevant to my life today. The secular army certainly did not ask advice or instruction from the rabbis. So I assume they did things I would not have approved of. However, the reality is today the Jewish people are living on the land by God’s grace.Fair enough. It’s just that I see many Orthodox Jews who disagree with the secular Zionists who do not believe in the Torah, and are behind the State of Israel. According to the Rabbis, the Zionists use the Jewish religion as an excuse to carve out state while plundering and destroying the lives of others in the region. That is the point that is made by Miko Peled and the Orthodox Rabbis protesting the State of Israel. It has nothing to do with religion. I was just wondering your view on the matter.
I’m not too familiar with this but I’ll cut and paste from a resource I remember from many years ago that discussed it:Can you tell us about Lilith?
There is no reference in the Tanach (Jewish Scriptures), Talmud, or other major Jewish works to a woman named Lillith. There is reference to a female night demon by this name in the Talmud, and possibly in Isaiah 34:14. (Depending on the translation which you consult this will be rendered either as Lillith or as “night creature” or “great owl”. Some commentaries say that this is referring to a night bird, others say it refers to the demon Lilith “mother of the demons”.)
The closest I have found to even a hint of the so-called “Lillith myth” in the Talmud, is in Erubin 18b which states that Adam separated from his wife for a period of 130 years (as part of his atonement for the sin of eating from the Tree of Knowledge of good and Evil). During this period he had an accidental “spilling of seed” -a wet dream- which “fathered” the demons. One of the kinds of demons fathered was the lilin - probably best translated as night demons. Lilin is the male plural of Lilith (which is feminine singular). Lilith is not mentioned in this account but there may be a connection. Elsewhere (Talmud Shabbos 151b) we see that Lilith grabs a hold of someone who sleeps alone. This may be alluding to an idea found in some Kaballistic sources that Lilith has some connection with the inducement of wet dreams and that this is how she ‘mothered’ the demons through Adam. That is mostly conjecture on my part. In any event, Lilith was clearly not a competitor with Eve according to any of this.
There are further references to Lilith as having been created prior to Eve (and even Adam) in Kaballistic works but, like all the material in such books, it requires extensive knowledge to even make head or tail of it, and I don’t have that kind of knowledge. Such references are not particularly numerous either. The primary source for the “Lillith myth” is an extremely controversial book titled Alpha-Beisa d’Ben Sirah (The Alphabet of Ben Sira). This book was never accepted as reliable by Jewish tradition and cannot be considered a reliable source. Lillith was never a major character in Jewish tradition and has only recently been adopted by certain radical feminists as a sort of icon (why they would choose a succubus for this is totally beyond me).
There is a theory propounded by Bible critics that if you look in the first section of Genesis, you will find that rather than a telling and then “recap” of the Creation story, there are actually two separate accounts. Since I don’t believe in the critical/documentary hypothesis, I don’t believe there are two accounts that represent two different traditions. Rather, they are two aspects of the same story that come to teach us different things.Are there actually 2 creation accounts in Judaism?
Guf simply means body in Hebrew. You may have seen this cited as a kabbalistic concept. I’m not very familiar with that area. The Torah uses anthropomorphic concepts to refer to the Divine, as does Kabbalah, while at the same time affirming total non-corporealism. God does not manifest in a body, period.Can you tell us about the guf (if that’s how it’s spelled)?
I agree, and that is the point Miko Peled and many other peace activists in Israel are trying to get out to the public, especially American Jews who do not know what is going on in Israel. All the injustices, how water is turned of in certain areas, how life is made miserable for Palestinians in order for them to leave and so new Jewish settlements can continue to expand, which is still happening today. Here is a good documentary about what it is like living in Israel if you are a Palestinian, made by an Israeli Anna Baltzer, worth watching on the matter for everyone to know the situation in Israel:We must deal with things the way they are today.
Yes, it all depends on the Truth of the matter. Documentaries and people like Miko Peled certainly help reveal a picture of what most people are unaware of, and to realize the desperate conditions many in the region have been reduced to. Hence the thousands of Orthodox Jews protesting the secular Zionist state of Israel. I was just wondering what your view on the matter was, or if you even knew about it. Enough said.I can go to youtube and find a documentary about what it’s like to live in Sderot under rocket fire. Enough. I’m disengaging (no pun intended).
How do Rabbis interpret Genesis 1: 26?There is a theory propounded by Bible critics that if you look in the first section of Genesis, you will find that rather than a telling and then “recap” of the Creation story, there are actually two separate accounts. Since I don’t believe in the critical/documentary hypothesis, I don’t believe there are two accounts that represent two different traditions. Rather, they are two aspects of the same story that come to teach us different things.
Moses before this thread is closed again , thankyou for your time and patienceNot having visited the site since before Passover, I see many questions and comments directed toward me in the now-closed thread Ask me anything (almost) about Judaism
Therefore, I am just making known that I plan to address these questions in brief in this space, either later tonight or tomorrow. Thank you all for your interest.![]()
Please correct me if I am wrong, but it is my understanding that YHWH promised Abraham that the land in question would be given to his descendants. Wouldn’t the descendants of Abraham also include the tribes of Ishmael ?God gave us the Land of Israel as an eternal inheritance and we have the right to live in it.