V
vern_humphrey
Guest
You have to actively seek it. It doesn’t come to you. It’s not like winning the lottery, you know.I will when I come across it!
You have to actively seek it. It doesn’t come to you. It’s not like winning the lottery, you know.I will when I come across it!
To be a response to this?Because I disagree with the graphic images does not, in any way, mean I do no work towards ending abortion. To imply such is certainly uncharitable and offensive.
Originally Posted by vern humphrey
So tell us about your work to save the unborn.
I don’t see any telling about your work, sharing your experiences. I just see disagreement.And that’s all they do – disagree. They have no positive agenda to put forward, no success stories of their own work, or anything like that.
Vern, you are simply trying to turn this into a “mine’s bigger than yours so therefore I must be right” contest rather than actually dealing with the question at hand.I don’t see any telling about your work, sharing your experiences. I just see disagreement.
You have to actively seek it. It doesn’t come to you. It’s not like winning the lottery, you know.
What I do to combat abortion is my personal business and I see no need to share it on this thread in order for others here to attempt to measure my aversion to this atrocity .Did you mean this:
To be a response to this?
I don’t see any telling about your work, sharing your experiences. I just see disagreement.
I agree wholeheartedly.I think it’s really wrong to have signs like that. It debases the Right to Life movement to the status of Shock Jock, and in my opinion further dehumanizes the children that have been killed in this manner. I’d hate for my child to see a poster like that…just like I’d hate for her to see A Nightmare on Elm Street. How can you touch someone’s heart when you’re turning their stomach?
Actually, you are describing yourself here.Vern, you are simply trying to turn this into a “mine’s bigger than yours so therefore I must be right” contest rather than actually dealing with the question at hand.
Nobody asked about Anna or Bill. We asked about KarenNC, and what she does. What is it you do, and how effective is it?Anna does 10 activities which protest abortion and says that tactic A is inappropriate
Bill does 11 activities which protest abortion and agrees with tactic A
Therefore tactic A must be appropriate.
Ah, what you do to combat abortion is your personal business, and what other people do to combat abortion is your personal business, too?What I do to combat abortion is my personal business and I see no need to share it on this thread in order for others here to attempt to measure my aversion to this atrocity .
No one has insinuated that you are pro-choice. We’ve just pointed out that attacks on people who work pro-life issues are inappropriate.All I am asking is to respect me enough not to insinuate I am pro-choice just because I disagee with the graphic displays.
No one called you pro-choice. But it is fair if people are using an approach and reporting success to ask those who oppose that approach and vilify those people to cite their experiences and successes.I did see on another post a bishop who held the sames feelings. I’d like to think you would not call that bishop pro-choice.
You are absolutely right. Prayer is just about the most effective tool our Lord ever left us and done properly, it should offend no one.I prefer to pray the rosary. Prayer is much more effective.
Yes prayer is probably the most effective tool there is. However, God expects us to do our part as well.You are absolutely right. Prayer is just about the most effective tool our Lord ever left us and done properly, it should offend no one.
I’d been trying to make the point earlier that shock tactics without attempts at evangelisation may just turn people from abortion clinics to artificial contraception. However long it takes and even if only few are convinced, effective evangelisation remains the one, certain and permanent strategy against abortion.
You can either be for God or against Him and until the death-seekers are turned toward God, they’ll always seek death in whatever form that appeals to them.
I don’t understand the question. Could you possibly restate it? If you are insinuating my posting here my opinion on the graphic signs I would ask why I shouldn’t? It is the purpose of the thread, is it not? I see no thread asking me to list my pro-life works.Ah, what you do to combat abortion is your personal business, and what other people do to combat abortion is your personal business, too?
I’ve not attacked anyone. I’ve given my opinion on the use of graphic signs. It disagree with your opinion. Last I checked opinions are just that, each individuals personal feelings.No one has insinuated that you are pro-choice. We’ve just pointed out that attacks on people who work pro-life issues are inappropriate.
I beg to differ with you. Several people on this thread have called people who differ with thier opinions about the graphic signs pro-choice. As I am not I find it extremely offensive and hurtful.No one called you pro-choice. But it is fair if people are using an approach and reporting success to ask those who oppose that approach and vilify those people to cite their experiences and successes.
Isn’t prayer “doing something”? WHy isn’t prayer considered doing our part? It’s certainly more effective (in my humble opinion) than graphic abortion photos.Yes prayer is probably the most effective tool there is. However, God expects us to do our part as well.
Lol - you won’t be allowed a humble opinion.Isn’t prayer “doing something”? WHy isn’t prayer considered doing our part? It’s certainly more effective (in my humble opinion) than graphic abortion photos.
Old Mrs. Watkins awoke one spring morning to find that the riverIsn’t prayer “doing something”? WHy isn’t prayer considered doing our part? It’s certainly more effective (in my humble opinion) than graphic abortion photos.
It’s quite simple. You claim the right to crticize other people’s actions, while holding yourself above criticism.I don’t understand the question. Could you possibly restate it?
When you enter the debate and attack what other people do, you must accept an examination of your own actions in this matter.If you are insinuating my posting here my opinion on the graphic signs I would ask why I shouldn’t? It is the purpose of the thread, is it not? I see no thread asking me to list my pro-life works.
And in the process attacked the people who use these signs.I’ve not attacked anyone. I’ve given my opinion on the use of graphic signs. It disagree with your opinion. Last I checked opinions are just that, each individuals personal feelings.
When did*** I ***do that?I beg to differ with you. Several people on this thread have called people who differ with thier opinions about the graphic signs pro-choice.
And you think the people you have criticized don’t find your remarks extremely offensive and hurtful?As I am not I find it extremely offensive and hurtful.
And I never called you pro-choice. And for you to insinuate that I did is extremely offensive and hurtful.On another thread, I have shown support for showing children instructional videos about improper touching. It is a subject that means very much to me because my family has been severely affected by childhood sexual abuse. I promise you, you would never find me calling someone pro-incest because they don’t want their children exposed to those films.
It’s quite simple. You claim the right to crticize other people’s actions, while holding yourself above criticism.
When you enter the debate and attack what other people do, you must accept an examination of your own actions in this matter.
And in the process attacked the people who use these signs.
When did*** I ***do that?
And you think the people you have criticized don’t find your remarks extremely offensive and hurtful?
And I never called you pro-choice. And for you to insinuate that I did is extremely offensive and hurtful.
Correct me if I am wrong, as I am certainly not an authority on Catholic hagiography, but aren’t there examples of saints who were canonized specifically because of their incredible intercessory prayer practices and the results thereof? I also believe there are Catholic orders whose primary purpose is intercessory prayer?Isn’t prayer “doing something”? WHy isn’t prayer considered doing our part? It’s certainly more effective (in my humble opinion) than graphic abortion photos.
Vern,
You are probably the rudest poster I have ever seen. Just because someone doesn’t agree with holding graphic posters outside abortion clinics doesn’t make them pro-abortion. I don’t necessarily think it is most effective - does that make me any less of a pro-life Catholic? I have brought my children up their whole lives knowing the evils of ANY abortion. I have given my money to prolife groups. Yet I don’t stand outside clinic doors (I give my charity time to other works but I respect those who do give of their time to demonstrating against abortion.). I suspect you might call me a hypocrite or worse, simply because I don’t agree with you in every nuance.
You need Jesus in your life.