Anti-Catholic Protestant denominations

  • Thread starter Thread starter susanbherald
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
As a whole, the further away from “high church” liturgy that a denomination goes, the more anti-Catholic the people usually are.
I would say more and more that the Catholic Church has more in common with evangelical Protestants than “high church” Protestants – Anglicans, Lutherans, etc.

The Catholic Church are together on important issues issues like: abortion, homosexuality, male-only clergy, etc. The Church is very much at odds with Anglicans, Lutherans, etc. on these same matters.
 
Last edited:
Depends on the Anglicans you are thinking of. Likewise, which Lutherans.
 
Since the Catholic Church and the Assyrian Church of the East have issued a joint christological statement, I would not refer to their christology as “perverse.”
 
Last edited:
Presbyterians used to have it in their main confession that the Pope was “that Antichrist”. Most have since removed it from the Westminster Confession or made a footnote that it is no longer believed, but the anti-Catholicism is still very strong in certain Presbyterian circles.

Beyond that, I’m not sure there’s a denomination that codifies anti-Catholicism as part of its belief. However, many Protestants are at least wary of Catholicism, if not absolutely hating sometimes. Ignorance is often a partial factor, both in fueling hate and mitigating it.
 
This seems to be an unnecessarily uncharitable way of talking about the Church of the East. As I understand it, they were until recently called Nestorians, but their Christology is not actually exactly the same as Nestorius’ Christology. In the end, it seems that for more than 1,500 years the Catholic Church and the Church of the East failed to reach agreement not because of any fundamental difference in beliefs but because of the limitations of the language used to express those beliefs.

As for Islam, rather than blaming the Church of the East for providing Muhammad with a deficient Christology, I think you’re on safer ground simply saying that Muhammad seems to have misunderstood what he learned about Christianity. Some argue that his rejection of the divinity of Christ is a manifestation of his extreme view of monotheism that did not allow belief in the Trinity. Certainly in the early years of Islam Christian scholars regarded it merely as the latest Christian heresy, not as a new religion in its own right.
 
When it comes to Baptists, keep in mind that there are many different kinds of Baptists.

When we lived down South in the 1980s, we had one Baptist Church in our city that was extremely “liberal,” actively pro-choice, and actually hosted the Wiccans every Sunday afternoon for their “service” (or whatever Wiccans do).

But we also had Baptist churches that handled poisonous snakes!

I grew up in a Swedish Baptist church (Conference) and never heard anything anti-Catholic from any of our pastors or teachers. Just the opposite–the pastor of our Baptist Church was best friends with the priest of the biggest Catholic parish in town!

Some Baptists are isolationists, while others are very engaged with society.

The point is–be careful not to assume anything about Baptists. What makes them Baptists is that they encourage splitting when there are disagreements! So there are lots of splits and therefore lots of Baptists!
 
I tend to think that the absolute worst are the Free Presbyterian Church of Ulster.
 
You’re right. Good call!

And even in the worst setting, there is always at least one bright flower who demonstrates the Love of Christ in all their ways.
 
People are people, some even more than others.

Motley, often, even when gathered in groups.
 
Depends on the Anglicans you are thinking of. Likewise, which Lutherans.
Some folks associate high church with liberal and low church with conservative.

We’re too motley for such groupings.
 
There are a variety of Protestant denominations that are anti-Catholic. Some are more so than others. I have found that in many cases their objections to the Catholic Church are ill-founded. This is because they make assumptions about what we Catholics believe rather know what we do believe. I have even heard many Protestants say we are not Christians!

An example of anti-Catholic behaviour among Protestants is what they think we believe about Our Lady. A lot of people think we worship Our Lady but that worship belongs to God alone. We do not, of course, worship Her, we know worship is for God only, and it is only God we worship. Others accuse us of idolatry because we use statues of Our Lord, Our Lady and the saints in our churches. Obviously, they are not false idols that we worship.

What happens is many forget the basic rules of argument. I am not bothered if a Protestant argues against the beliefs of the Catholic Church. I would be quite happy to defend the Faith. However, I would like someone arguing against Catholicism to argue against something we do believe.
 
What happens is many forget the basic rules of argument. I am not bothered if a Protestant argues against the beliefs of the Catholic Church. I would be quite happy to defend the Faith. However, I would like someone arguing against Catholicism to argue against something we do believe.
Absolutely right. And the reverse should be true, as well, avoiding the temptation to argue against “Protestant beliefs “, instead of individual traditions, denominations, or communions.
 
Absolutely right. And the reverse should be true, as well, avoiding the temptation to argue against “Protestant beliefs “, instead of individual traditions, denominations, or communions.
This presumes that person agrees with all the beliefs of their denomination. That’s not been my observation.
 
40.png
JonNC:
Absolutely right. And the reverse should be true, as well, avoiding the temptation to argue against “Protestant beliefs “, instead of individual traditions, denominations, or communions.
This presumes that person agrees with all the beliefs of their denomination. That’s not been my observation.
Well, that’s true of the Catholic Church, too.
 
To some extent a side effect, to some extent a cause of its exacerbation. The denomination was co-founded by Ian Paisley, who became its moderator for 57 years. Paisley dominated Northern Ireland politics for more than 40 years. He founded the hardline Democratic Unionist Party, which he went on to lead for 37 years, serving as a member of the Northern Ireland Parliament, Assembly, Constitutional Convention, and Forum for Political Dialogue, the House of Commons and the House of Lords, the Privy Council, and the European Parliament. Towards the end of his long career he served briefly as First Minister of Northern Ireland. Through his patronage his wife also became a member of the House of Lords and his son received a ministerial position in the Northern Ireland government.

Although he softened somewhat in his final years, Ian Paisley’s theological and political worldview was dominated by hatred of Catholicism (typically termed ‘Popery’ and identified as the Whore of Babylon) and hatred of homosexuality (typically termed ‘sodomy’). He also entertained a fair degree of hatred for Protestants who weren’t quite Protestant enough for his liking. His earliest campaigning was undertaken under the auspices of the National Union of Protestants, which took on causes such as disrupting Anglican services (too Catholic), protesting against a Catholic Mass being broadcast on the BBC, and protesting against a Catholic priest speaking in Westminster Abbey. He made something of a name for himself by protesting against the lowering of flags to mark the death of Pope John XXIII (also known as ‘this Romish man of sin’). He also protested against the Presbyterian Church in Ireland, which he considered too Catholic.

Paisley also expounded a theory that the EU was a Vatican plot to create a Catholic superpower in Europe. For this reason the 666th seat in the European Parliament was kept vacant in anticipation of the Antichrist eventually occupying it. On the occasion of John Paul II’s visit to the Parliament Paisley had to be removed from the chamber when he disrupted proceedings to denounce him as the Antichrist (not for the first or last time). To give credit where it is due, Paisley was fearless in denouncing anybody he considered insufficiently British or Protestant, including the Queen Mother, Princess Margaret, and Margaret Thatcher.

Paisley’s main achievement was in undermining moderate Protestantism and Unionism, promoting extremism, and rejecting any compromise that had the potential to bring about peace in Northern Ireland and the British mainland. He was also active in creating paramilitary organisations and inciting violence, although he was rather careful to avoid too much direct involvement in the actual business of kidnapping and terrorism and consequently acquired only a handful of minor convictions and spent a short time in prison. Throughout his long and destructive career, theology and politics, the Free Presbyterian Church of Ulster and the Democratic Unionist Party, were inextricable.
 
True, but what I was referring to as perverse was their Christology during the time of Muhammad. As I understand, they’ve only recently moved from Nestorianism towards more orthodox doctrine.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top