Anti-Islam Minister Terry Jones Says He Feels No Responsibility for U.S. Ambassador’s Death

  • Thread starter Thread starter JustaServant
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
The radical element of Islam isn’t going to tolerate calculated insults to its beliefs and is “going to live in a world that has free societies” by murdering whoever they feel represents the source of the insult. That’s how its been for centuries and how its going to be for the foreseeable future. How the U.S. co-exists with these with radicals shouldn’t be complicated by a guy acting like a teenager throwing gasoline on a fire so he can get on the news, which is what Jones is doing, except Jones knows that violence and death will follow.

do you honestly think that burning a koran will somehow teach radical Muslims anything?

Westerby
Co-exist? Don’t tell me that was inspired by a bumper sticker…

At any rate, that would be like putting a bunch of child sex offenders next to your school and if there’s an issue, the police just say “can’t we all just get along?”

I don’t think you understand the mentality of jihadists and other fanatics:

These guys and gals really do think they can change or conquer the world, and the demographics and changing political attitudes in places like the EU are downright frightening.

Do you realize that groups like the Muslim Brotherhood want to set-up a Caliphate over the entire Western world? And do you realize that their numbers are surging in the face of American foreign apologetics and the Muslim birth-rate is nearly twice the world average?

Do the math!
 
How do they dare to tell you what to say in your own country? And to kill (try to kill in other places) the ambassadeur for this?
Because the democrats tolerate it as another viewpoint.

Believe it or not, it is possible to stand up to fanatics without going to war with other countries or religions.
 
I appreciate your points and our discussion, but I really think its run its course at this point. You have a tendency to take a situation and then apply an extreme example and say the two are the same. The fact of the matter is that while this style of argument is effective in legal theory, it’s not applicable to real world situations. There is no need to “answer” your questions because, quite frankly, it’s not even an accurate portrayal of the real world.

Where you going to answer my questions or acknowledge the fact that you misread my posts and the entire topic of the thread to begin with, or are we ignoring that?
Wow…hey, can I borrow some of those quotes?
 
Islam is a violent religion and always will be no matter what we do good or bad:coffeeread:
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top