A
Alexius
Guest
ExactlyI am not sure I expressed myself well in one respect. It is not the Papacy, exactly, that most Protestants object to, though they may think they do. It is the Magisterium, or teaching authority, which is represented by the Papacy, to which most object; the authority to tell me that X is true and Y is not.
That’s very different from Orthodoxy, which really does object to the Papacy itself, but which very much maintains that the Church (by which they mean Orthodoxy) has the authority to teach.
Not all Protestants believe in “sola scriptura”, but all hold it to some degree. In other words, the “teacher” is the Bible alone. Since the Bible is manifestly subject to interpretation, each man is, then, his own “Pope” in a real, if not acknowledged, sense. Not all Protestants hold it in the same way, it’s more of a continuum. But all share it to some degree or they would not be Protestants at all.
Now, some Protestants might perceive Orthodoxy as less authoritarian than the RCC. In some ways it is, as with divorce and birth control. But in some ways it is greatly more so. If the EO who post in here are in any way representative, their doctrinal “lines in the sand” rival the Grand Canyon. Those Protestants who, in the sense of doctrine or belief hold their notion of “freedom of conscience” sacred, would be severely taken aback to learn how little leeway there is in the beliefs of the various Orthodox faiths.
I’m not trying to start a generalized fight here with either Orthodox or Protestants. I’m simply observing that the degree to which committed Protestants do not attack Orthodoxy likely bears a direct relationship to how little they know about it.
:byzsoc: :knight1: