Antrim County hand tally affirms certified election results

  • Thread starter Thread starter 1ke
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
Whether newsmax called the election based on electoral college vote has nothing to do with the hand recount in Antrim county virtually matching the machine count.

All the ruckus about the so called audit of the dominion machines and their 68% error rate should now be put to rest. Unfortunately, for some, they will still claim fraud of some sort or another, just as the loosing candidate continues to do.
 
farronwolf said:
68% error rate
Click to expand...
The initial error in the unofficial vote counts on two occassions giving Antrim County to Biden was corrected later to Trump in the official count and attributed to the wrong version of software being on the machine.

Note that this was not the rate of error in the vote total but in the log, pointing to the great number of adjudication instances.
 
Vico said:
attributed to the wrong version of software being on the machine.
Click to expand...
Not the “wrong version of the software”. The clerk loaded the wrong ballot, or rather failed to update the ballot for all precincts.
 
1ke said:
48.png
Vico:
attributed to the wrong version of software being on the machine.
Click to expand...
Not the “wrong version of the software”. The clerk loaded the wrong ballot, or rather failed to update the ballot for all precincts.
Click to expand...
OK, but going on the Michigan Secretary of State Jocelyn Benson website states that:
The erroneous reporting of unofficial results from Antrim county was a result of accidental error on the part of the Antrim County Clerk. The equipment and software did not malfunction and all ballots were properly tabulated. However, the clerk accidentally did not update the software used to collect voting machine data and report unofficial results.
Click to expand...
 
Vico said:
OK, but going on the Michigan Secretary of State Jocelyn Benson website states that:
Click to expand...
That’s unfortunate wording. There wasn’t a software issue. The issue was that the clerk didn’t update the ballot in all precincts and that resulted in a tabulating error. Which was caught and corrected immediately, even before the canvas.
 
Last edited:
1ke said:
48.png
Vico:
OK, but going on the Michigan Secretary of State Jocelyn Benson website states that:
Click to expand...
That’s unfortunate wording. There wasn’t a software issue. The issue was that the clerk didn’t update the ballot in all precincts and that resulted in a tabulating error. Which was caught and corrected immediately, even before the canvas.
Click to expand...
I think that the ballot configuration might be broadly called software, as configuration parameters.
 
Last edited:
The OP does not dispel that an audit still showed the machines way out of whack. It is editorializing the story.


If anything, it might look suspicious if NOW, the handcount matches the original count.

State Audit:


The OP observation really has no substance. Is one saying the state audit was wrong??
 
Victoria33 said:
The OP does not dispel that an audit still showed the machines way out of whack. I
Click to expand...
Ramsland has been discredited. He made numerous errors in his so-called audit.

A hand recount shows definitively that his “audit” was bunk.
 
1ke said:
48.png
Victoria33:
The OP does not dispel that an audit still showed the machines way out of whack. I
Click to expand...
Ramsland has been discredited. He made numerous errors in his so-called audit.

A hand recount shows definitively that his “audit” was bunk.
Click to expand...
It caught the erroneous count in the unofficial results from Nov 3 and later before the final official results. Of course that was “a result of accidental error on the part of the Antrim County Clerk” per the Michigan Secretary of State.

Addition: Note that the forensic audit report differentiates between human error and “machine and/or software error” such that improper configuration is not categorized as human error. Also in one item in the forensic report im response to “The correct results always were and continue to be reflected on
the tabulator totals tape and on the ballots themselves.”:
19. The Secretary of State Jocelyn Benson’s statement is false. Our findings show
that the tabulator tape totals were significantly altered by utilization of two
different program versions, and not just the Dominion Election Management
System. This is the opposite of the claim that the Office of the Secretary of
State made on its website. The fact that these significant errors were not caught
in ballot testing and not caught by the local county clerk shows that there are
major inherent built-in vulnerabilities and process flaws in the Dominion
Election Management System, and that other townships/precincts and the
entire election have been affected.
Click to expand...
 
Last edited:
I’ll believe the elected officials who run elections for a living.
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top