Any bronies (meaning MLP fans who are male)?

  • Thread starter Thread starter rocklobster
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
I’m what is considered a “nerd” by many because of things I do, but I still have a traditional view of manliness that I follow(albeit, my form of “nerdiness” is probably different, as it comes from medieval reenactment). We should follow tradition as Catholics. I can’t speak for filipinos, but as a European I must follow what my ancestors did as best as I can, which includes being strong and fighting for our ideals, not watching shows made for female children.
Well, I’m not fond of medieval manliness either. I’m personally glad Miguel de Cervantes wrote Don Quixote. It’s a good expression of what I intensely dislike in the so-called ‘manliness’ of medieval chivalry. 👍

Ironically, those same literary devices on knighthood are used in MLP as well. Hence, another reason why I don’t like it so much. There’s only so much sugar I can take… and with anthros to boot. BP
 
Although on further reflection, I’d actually appreciate some of the values if they took out the songs and the anthro element. (Yes MLP fans I’m aware that what I’m asking for is still considered major sacrilege but hey, I can’t help my tastes ;):p).
I think the MLP ponies serve as toy examples for the virtues they represent, in much same manner as do similar cartoons with anthropomorphic animals (Care Bears). An older example is Aesop’s fables, where some of the stories have anthro animals and teach moral lessons. I guess when it comes to teaching children the virtues, animals (or talking vegetables) have a certain appeal. (Tolkien talked about “beast fables” where humans basically wore animal skins in the essay “On Fairy Stories.”)

I admit, it’s a bit strange for men to watch a children’s cartoon, but if at the very least some of these Bronies take the virtues more seriously (if they hadn’t before because of the crassness of popular culture), I think at least some good can come from this phenomenon.
 
Well, I’m not fond of medieval manliness either. I’m personally glad Miguel de Cervantes wrote Don Quixote. It’s a good expression of what I intensely dislike in the so-called ‘manliness’ of medieval chivalry. 👍

Ironically, those same literary devices on knighthood are used in MLP as well. Hence, another reason why I don’t like it so much. There’s only so much sugar I can take… and with anthros to boot. BP
I never said they must follow the medieval form of manliness, but they should follow what a man is supposed to be, a protector of land, family, and blood. I don’t know why you have an issue with “knighthood”, or how a children’s show for females would be like real knighthood.
 
I think the MLP ponies serve as toy examples for the virtues they represent, in much same manner as do similar cartoons with anthropomorphic animals (Care Bears). An older example is Aesop’s fables, where some of the stories have anthro animals and teach moral lessons. I guess when it comes to teaching children moral lesson, animals (or talking vegetables) have a certain appeal.
Yeah I get that. They’re just not my thing though and I don’t blame anyone else who still likes the genre.

In fact, when I think about it, I can actually appreciate cute stuff to an extent. I like chibis for instance:



I also liked watching stuff like Cardcaptor Sakura and Mirumo de Pon which is pretty much right up your alley when it comes teaching morals with cute stuff. :o

On the other hand, when you make something full of anthros like MLP, it just… stops.

P.S.

I see what you did there with the talking vegetables. 😉
 
I never said they must follow the medieval form of manliness, but they should follow what a man is supposed to be, a protector of land, family, and blood. I don’t know why you have an issue with “knighthood”, or how a children’s show for females would be like real knighthood.
You’ve never watched the show have you? Well, I haven’t directly but I’ve already been forced to endure it being watched by three other siblings on very loud speakers.

Trust me, your medieval values are there.

As for my attitude towards knighthood, well maybe you aren’t as much as a nerd as I am. I don’t believe a static model of physical strength, gender, or archetype/stereotype is the exclusive representation of a protector.

But before I go on, let me ask you: Do you fancy imagining yourself as the knight charging gloriously into battle to protect his homeland and whatnot?
 
Yeah I get that. They’re just not my thing though and I don’t blame anyone else who still likes the genre.

In fact, when I think about it, I can actually appreciate cute stuff to an extent. I like chibis for instance:

I also liked watching stuff like Cardcaptor Sakura and Mirumo de Pon which is pretty much right up your alley when it comes teaching morals with cute stuff. :o

On the other hand, when you make something full of anthros like MLP, it just… stops.

P.S.

I see what you did there with the talking vegetables. 😉
I just looked up both of those shows, and I’m a little shocked you could say Cardcaptor Sakura is moral… I found this on the wikipedia page for it:
“In particular, the romantic relationship between elementary student Rika Sasaki and her teacher Yoshiyuki Terada is presented in such a way that it can be seen as a sweet and innocent tale of “wish fulfillment”, or if examined more seriously, as a mildly disturbing story of pedophilic love.”

I’m sorry, but such things don’t sit well with me at all. Paedophiles should work against their thoughts, this show appears to not propose that. I’m now greatly disturbed that someone can think this is moral. Further research tells me the character is TEN! Mirmo de Pon! seems a little odd to me, but I couldn’t find anything horribly wrong with it. I’m not saying all animated shows are bad, while I haven’t watched it in awhile, the Dragon Ball series was a fairly good show from what I remember. It taught the morals of love, to not give up, fight for what you love and believe in, strong family morals, etc…
You’ve never watched the show have you? Well, I haven’t directly but I’ve already been forced to endure it being watched by three other siblings on very loud speakers.

Trust me, your medieval values are there.

As for my attitude towards knighthood, well maybe you aren’t as much as a nerd as I am. I don’t believe a static model of physical strength, gender, or archetype/stereotype is the exclusive representation of a protector.

But before I go on, let me ask you: Do you fancy imagining yourself as the knight charging gloriously into battle to protect his homeland and whatnot?
I tried to bare the first episode one time when a friend tried to show me it, I couldn’t bare it at all. I didn’t know “nerd” came to meant such things as you are making it out to be. For all proposes, I’m a highly technical person, who has fantasy related hobbies(along with ones that are intellectual in focus). By standards, the “nerd” anime thing is much newer compared to what I would be classed as by people.

A man has, at least in Europa focused morals, been defined as being a strong protector of land, faith, blood, and family. When I reenact, I do play as so things in all of my kits, as do most people.
 
I also liked watching stuff like Cardcaptor Sakura and Mirumo de Pon which is pretty much right up your alley when it comes teaching morals with cute stuff. :o

P.S.

I see what you did there with the talking vegetables. 😉
That’s OK , I don’t mind if you don’t like MLP. 🙂

Well, I do recall watching Cardcaptor Sakura back in the day. 🙂 I haven’t seen Mirumo de Pon, but I’ll check it out.

Of course, toy examples of the virtues or of the Bible (be they anthro or not) are simply learning aids for children (or perhaps for beginners), sooner or later we have to move on to more complex matters, reading the philosophical masters like Aristotle or St. Thomas Aquinas on the virtues and studying the Bible.
 
I’m sorry, but such things don’t sit well with me at all. Paedophiles should work against their thoughts, this show appears to not propose that. I’m now greatly disturbed that someone can think this is moral. Further research tells me the character is TEN!
You do know that by reacting like this, you’re falling for the second interpretation which only those who are disturbed to begin with and have a tendency to over-analyze are capable of… right?
Mirmo de Pon! seems a little odd to me, but I couldn’t find anything horribly wrong with it. I’m not saying all animated shows are bad, while I haven’t watched it in awhile, the Dragon Ball series was a fairly good show from what I remember. It taught the morals of love, to not give up, fight for what you love and believe in, strong family morals, etc…
UGH!! Dragonball! Keep. It. Away. Please! If those over-buff Super Saiyan are your idea of manliness, then that just makes you less of a nerd. I’m pretty sure oversized muscles and super strength fall under your traditional image of ‘manliness’.
A man has, at least in Europa focused morals, been defined as being a strong protector of land, faith, blood, and family. When I reenact, I do play as so things in all of my kits, as do most people.
Ah but again, those values aren’t defined (or even understood the same way) by a single archetype.

Sure, go ahead defend your values with sword in one hand and shield in the other.

I’ll defend what’s dear to me with merely a wave of my hand and a smile as I enjoy the sight of my screaming, burning foes. :cool:
 
You do know that by reacting like this, you’re falling for the second interpretation which only those who are disturbed to begin with and have a tendency to over-analyze are capable of… right?

UGH!! Dragonball! Keep. It. Away. Please! If those over-buff Super Saiyan are your idea of manliness, then that just makes you less of a nerd. I’m pretty sure oversized muscles and super strength fall under your traditional image of ‘manliness’.

Ah but again, those values aren’t defined (or even understood the same way) by a single archetype.

Sure, go ahead defend your values with sword in one hand and shield in the other.

I’ll defend what’s dear to me with merely a wave of my hand and a smile as I enjoy the sight of my screaming, burning foes. :cool:
You have a weird idea about what a nerd is. Nerds, at least back in the days when the word was starting to be used, were into fantasy stories and such, along with board/P’n’P games, comics, etc… Most MLP fans I’ve seen are Europeans, and there isn’t too much of an interest outside of the Europeans into MLP(People I know who aren’t European find the whole thing more disturbing than I do) from what I’ve seen.

As for the show, it says it’s a love story(non-platonic) between a 10-year-old and a mid-30s male. It also apparently also has same-sex relationships, which are also immoral.
 
You have a weird idea about what a nerd is. Nerds, at least back in the days when the word was starting to be used, were into fantasy stories and such, along with board/P’n’P games, comics, etc… Most MLP fans I’ve seen are Europeans, and there isn’t too much of an interest outside of the Europeans into MLP(People I know who aren’t European find the whole thing more disturbing than I do) from what I’ve seen.
No, the basest definition of a nerd is someone who is the opposite of classical ‘manliness’. As much as I find The Big Bang Theory a little exaggerated, the characters there are closer to that definition. Heck, aside from nerds, there are other archetypes that aren’t ‘manly’ but are just as good (and in some regards, better than) what you’re advocating.
As for the show, it says it’s a love story(non-platonic) between a 10-year-old and a mid-30s male. It also apparently also has same-sex relationships, which are also immoral.
I repeat: You’re over-analyzing. I haven’t even watched or read much but already I can tell I’ve seen far more of it than you have.
 
No, the basest definition of a nerd is someone who is the opposite of classical ‘manliness’. As much as I find The Big Bang Theory a little exaggerated, the characters there are closer to that definition. Heck, aside from nerds, there are other archetypes that aren’t ‘manly’ but are just as good (and in some regards, better than) what you’re advocating.

I repeat: You’re over-analyzing. I haven’t even watched or read much but already I can tell I’ve seen far more of it than you have.
You must not know the early use of the word. They didn’t fit it, but they loved stories with such things, and many wished they were manly like that. I seriously suggest you look into the origins of the words and such. Also, I’m over-analyzing? It clearly is a non-platonic situation between a ten-year-old, and a male in his mid-30s. It also has same-sex relationships, which aren’t moral. That anime preaches the very immoral.
 
You must not know the early use of the word. They didn’t fit it, but they loved stories with such things, and many wished they were manly like that. I seriously suggest you look into the origins of the words and such.
Sorry but the study of semantics does away with any relevance to origin of a term as applied to its current incarnation.

Furthermore, I already stated how much I intensely dislike the image of an overbuff male as the image of manliness.

Do I see myself as the heroic knight riding in to save a captured, ingenue princess?

No, I see myself as the aloof bishounen in the mage hood who saves that princess by just buying her before she gets sold to the local brothel.

Do I see myself as the hero fighting a dragon?

No, I see myself as the guy a dragonbecoming.

You’re free to idolize your version of manliness but please accept the fact that the Church doesn’t mandate your preferences.
Also, I’m over-analyzing? It clearly is a non-platonic situation between a ten-year-old, and a male in his mid-30s. It also has same-sex relationships, which aren’t moral. That anime preaches the very immoral.
Read the Wikipedia quote you just cited. Twice. You’re over-analyzing.
 
Sorry but the study of semantics does away with any relevance to origin of a term as applied to its current incarnation.

Furthermore, I already stated how much I intensely dislike the image of an overbuff male as the image of manliness.

Do I see myself as the heroic knight riding in to save a captured, ingenue princess?

No, I see myself as the aloof bishounen in the mage hood who saves that princess by just buying her before she gets sold to the local brothel.

Do I see myself as the hero fighting a dragon?

No, I see myself as the guy becoming dragon.

You’re free to idolize your version of manliness but please accept the fact that the Church doesn’t mandate your preferences.

Read the Wikipedia quote you just cited. Twice. You’re over-analyzing.
Well, as a non-European maybe you have a different view, but for Europeans it is a tradition for what I am saying we should become, and we must follow tradition(if we don’t, we just become Protestants). I am not over-analyzing. How is it over-analyzing to see that a non-platonic “love” between a 10-year-old and a male in his mid-30s is a story of paedophilia. How is it over-analyzing to say that same-sex relationships are immoral?
 
Well, as a non-European maybe you have a different view, but for Europeans it is a tradition for what I am saying we should become, and we must follow tradition(if we don’t, we just become Protestants).
I would actually say that the less my country and the Church draws on European influence, the worlds of art and literature would be a much better place.

Unfortunately, that has not been the historical case or else I wouldn’t have so much dislike for it.
I am not over-analyzing. How is it over-analyzing to see that a non-platonic “love” between a 10-year-old and a male in his mid-30s is a story of paedophilia. How is it over-analyzing to say that same-sex relationships are immoral?
Yes you are. It says right there that there are two ways to view the relationship you’re criticizing (a relationship that’s not much critical to the plot anyways). You’re doing the latter, the one that over-analyzes.
 
I would actually say that the less my country and the Church draws on European influence, the worlds of art and literature would be a much better place.

Unfortunately, that has not been the historical case or else I wouldn’t have so much dislike for it.

Yes you are. It says right there that there are two ways to view the relationship you’re criticizing (a relationship that’s not much critical to the plot anyways). You’re doing the latter, the one that over-analyzes.
Any love that is not platonic between a child and an adult is immoral, it’s paedophilia plain and simple. You also just avoided that there are homosexual relationships in the anime, which is COMPLETELY IMMORAL! As for the Church not being European, it will never happen. The Church is founded on European ideals, is based in Europa, and will remain such. How would it be better if it wasn’t founded on European ideals? Since Vatican II we’ve seen mass go down the drain with the influence of non-European traditions. The Church is built on tradition, if you don’t like that, don’t be a Catholic.
 
Any love that is not platonic between a child and an adult is immoral, it’s paedophilia plain and simple. You also just avoided that there are homosexual relationships in the anime, which is COMPLETELY IMMORAL!
Who’s avoiding? You’re the one not reading your own citations. If you can’t stand stop reading things seriously and over-analyzing, you’ll see pedophilia and homosexual relationships everywhere.

Oh and FYI, your medieval ancestors marked the age of consent as young as fourteen. Please reflect on that before you start derailing this thread even further.
As for the Church not being European, it will never happen. The Church is founded on European ideals, is based in Europa, and will remain such. How would it be better if it wasn’t founded on European ideals?
Oh you mean ideals like: The master race. Inferiority of the savage.
Since Vatican II we’ve seen mass go down the drain with the influence of non-European traditions. The Church is built on tradition, if you don’t like that, don’t be a Catholic.
And this is why the likes of SSPX fall into schism.

Are you done derailing the thread now?
 
Who’s avoiding? You’re the one not reading your own citations. If you can’t stand stop reading things seriously and over-analyzing, you’ll see pedophilia and homosexual relationships everywhere.

Oh and FYI, your medieval ancestors marked the age of consent as young as fourteen. Please reflect on that before you start derailing this thread even further.

Oh you mean ideals like: The master race. Inferiority of the savage.

And this is why the likes of SSPX fall into schism.

Are you done derailing the thread now?
There are clear homosexual relationships in the book(two men in non-platonic love). I didn’t over-analyze at all. My ancestors didn’t have intercourse with 10-year-olds in the medieval ages, there is a huge difference between 10 and 14, and even 14 is not acceptable in today’s societies(we now live much longer on average). Two men with non-platonic love is immoral, and to say otherwise is heretical even to Vatican II.

Are you implying that the Europeans are all into “master race” ideals? You’re the one saying Europeans are not good, and that everything would be better without us. Also, who said I even go to SSPX? I haven’t made a reference to where I go. Novus Ordo mass is nothing but degeneracy. You’re being inane to say that paedophilia is alright, or that two men in a non-platonic relationship is alright.
 
There are clear homosexual relationships in the book(two men in non-platonic love).
Says the one who hasn’t even read one chapter or a single episode. Then again, you’re on a thread about a show with which you’ve had little experience with either.
I didn’t over-analyze at all. My ancestors didn’t have intercourse with 10-year-olds in the medieval ages, there is a huge difference between 10 and 14, and even 14 is not acceptable in today’s societies(we now live much longer on average). Two men with non-platonic love is immoral, and to say otherwise is heretical even to Vatican II.
Oh wait, my mistake. It wasn’t fourteen…

… it was twelve:
In the 12th century Gratian, the influential founder of Canon law in medieval Europe, accepted age of puberty for marriage to be between 12 and 14 but acknowledged consent to be meaningful if the children were older than 7.
-source: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Age_of_consent
Are you implying that the Europeans are all into “master race” ideals?
Seeing as how it was you guys who were all bent on owning the world, I would say yes. The only non-Europeans I knew who had the same ambitions were the Mongols and the Persians.

I don’t even want to start on how you guys trashed my country’s pre-colonial culture and how we now only have little that we can really call our own, not influenced by the likes of Spain.
You’re the one saying Europeans are not good, and that everything would be better without us. Also, who said I even go to SSPX? I haven’t made a reference to where I go. Novus Ordo mass is nothing but degeneracy.
I would say as far as cultural arts go, yeah I would think people would do well to stop giving you all too much credit. You don’t own the world and while I’ve acknowledged Europe’s place in it, it’s high time people like you realize that neither it nor the Church will revolve around your culture.

P.S.

Care to go back on topic now? Start your own thread if you really like to boast about the so-called superiority of ‘manly’ Europe.
 
Says the one who hasn’t even read one chapter or a single episode. Then again, you’re on a thread about a show with which you’ve had little experience with either.

Oh wait, my mistake. It wasn’t fourteen…

… it was twelve:

-source: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Age_of_consent

Seeing as how it was you guys who were all bent on owning the world, I would say yes. The only non-Europeans I knew who had the same ambitions were the Mongols and the Persians.

I don’t even want to start on how you guys trashed my country’s pre-colonial culture and how we now only have little that we can really call our own, not influenced by the likes of Spain.

I would say as far as cultural arts go, yeah I would think people would do well to stop giving you all too much credit. You don’t own the world and while I’ve acknowledged Europe’s place in it, it’s high time people like you realize that neither it nor the Church will revolve around your culture.

P.S.

Care to go back on topic now? Start your own thread if you really like to boast about the so-called superiority of ‘manly’ Europe.
Ahh, avoiding that you promote homosexual relationships now? You’re country also had a lower AoC, doesn’t make it right now in today’s societies. The only non-Europeans who wanted that were the Mongols and Persians? Let’s just forget the Ottomans, the Moors, the Huns, etc… The Church is based in Rome, it is above the nations, it’s based in LATIN culture, it speaks a LATIN language, and these things won’t change. The Church will continue to remain to be European, as it always has been and always will be, or are you saying the Church should be destroyed, moved away from Rome, and that it should no longer keep the tradition of Latin being used? That’s not very Catholic, remember the Church wasn’t built to change, it was built on tradition. Also, without colonialism you wouldn’t have Catholicism, the one, holy, catholic, and apostolic faith. I guess you just don’t want the faith of tradition, and want something else. It seems like you’d be best with Protestantism if you feel that the tradition should be destroyed and the church should be based around your people.

“Rome is above the nations”
 
Ahh, avoiding that you promote homosexual relationships now?
Do you even know what Yukito actually is? :rolleyes:

And frankly, I hate yaoi. Each time guys like you accuse me of homosexuality, I feel tempted to pull something out of the darker parts of my mind that will prove the complete opposite.
You’re country also had a lower AoC, doesn’t make it right now in today’s societies.
Now who’s the one in denial? :rolleyes:
The only non-Europeans who wanted that were the Mongols and Persians? Let’s just forget the Ottomans, the Moors, the Huns, etc… The Church is based in Rome, it is above the nations, it’s based in LATIN culture, it speaks a LATIN language, and these things won’t change.
Ah yes, Rome. One of the greatest conquering empires in the world. So tell me, how far did the empires of your examples reach? By the way, last time I checked, Turkey’s part of Europe as well. 😉
The Church will continue to remain to be European, as it always has been and always will be, or are you saying the Church should be destroyed, moved away from Rome, and that it should no longer keep the tradition of Latin being used?
Church =/= Europe.

Christ Himself was a Jew.

Our faith originated from the Middle East, not Europe.

And for goodness sake, start your own thread if you want to proclaim the glory of Europe and how it seems to be divinely bound to the Church. I’m sure you’ll attract more who would like to contest you or is that what you’re afraid of?
That’s not very Catholic, remember the Church wasn’t built to change, it was built on tradition. Also, without colonialism you wouldn’t have Catholicism, the one, holy, catholic, and apostolic faith. I guess you just don’t want the faith of tradition, and want something else. It seems like you’d be best with Protestantism if you feel that the tradition should be destroyed and the church should be based around your people.

“Rome is above the nations”
The only point I see in Latin is either through church ceremony or as clippings for fictional magic spells.

You’re lucky that the Church was the only good thing that the Spaniards gave us or I would have cursed Magellan’s arrival in its entirety.

Now, please, if you know what’s good for this thread, you’d start your own.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top