E
Elias
Guest
Buddha isn’t a canonized saint. Josaphat is not Buddah and Buddha is not Josaphat. They are two different people with stories that are coincidentally similar.
See my post #6 in this thread. The Catholic Encyclopedia says that the Buddha is a Catholic saint. He is one of the early saints, so I suspect that he did not go through the modern canonization process.Buddha isn’t a canonized saint. Josaphat is not Buddah and Buddha is not Josaphat. They are two different people with stories that are coincidentally similar.
I totally agree…and feel it to be the same for a Catholic?I honestly do believe that non-Catholics could perform Miracles, if God so allowed it, although to be more precise, it wouldn’t really be them performing Miracles, it would be God performing Miracles through them.
It’s the same way as the man who was not one of Jesus’ followers was able to cast out demons in Jesus’ name.I honestly do believe that non-Catholics could perform Miracles, if God so allowed it, although to be more precise, it wouldn’t really be them performing Miracles, it would be God performing Miracles through them.
Indeed.Unfortunately, one problem we have with a lot of alleged “non-Catholic miracles” is that non-Catholic churches, with the exception of Coptic/ Orthodox, don’t seem to have a rigorous investigation process for looking into whether some happening was truly miraculous.
See the Old Testament.Hi, from what I understand, a saints miracles are like God’s stamp of approval.
Are there any miracles or supernatural event that is recognized by the Catholic Church that is associated with a person who hasn’t died Catholic? If not, what would be the closest? Someone like Rasputin? Thanks.
See my post #5 in this thread. That includes a link to the Catholic Encyclopedia’s entry for Barlaam and Josaphat. That entry explains how the Buddha became a Catholic, and Orthodox, saint.Buddha is not a Catholic saint. … Why would someone who is agnostic and makes up their own non-Catholic religion be venerated in the Catholic Church?
How do you answer the argument that Josaphat was really not Buddha but a different person with a similar life.See my post #5 in this thread. That includes a link to the Catholic Encyclopedia’s entry for Barlaam and Josaphat. That entry explains how the Buddha became a Catholic, and Orthodox, saint.
They are not available to answer questions. That is why it is appropriate to ask those who are quoting from it to support their POV.You would have to ask the Catholic Encyclopedia that.