Wow!
That’s what I call a “ad hominem + shifting the burden of proof + lack of argument ” combo.
Here is an advice: instead of attacking others, try answering objectively their statements. ; )
Edit: I was even called a fundamentalist protestant : /
The thing is, Aulef, there’s been this other thread on Evolution which has gone over its 2000-post limit five times. And in ten thousand comments, it’s fairly obvious that most Creationists have no knowledge of evolution to start with, and no interest in finding out any more. The fact that you have to ask “Is this fossil an example of a transitional animal” illustrates this very well. If you knew anything about evolution you wouldn’t have to ask, and if you were at all interested in finding out any more you could have Googled it and read far more than anybody could explain here.
Ad hominem - saying you don’t know anything about evolution. True.
Shifting the burden of proof - I’m not interested in proving anything. False.
Lack of argument - if you mean I’m not telling you lots of stuff you don’t want to know. True.
“Try answering objectively their statements”. I have responded to your statements. I have not answered your questions. You do not want them answered.
I was hoping that this thread might concentrate a little more on Creationism, and a little less on Evolution, but it is becoming increasingly apparent that Creationists have very little to offer about it.
Can anyone help? Why did God create dinosaurs, if all he was going to do was kill them all off again?