Any young earth creationists out there?

  • Thread starter Thread starter semper_catholicus
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
Christians are dying every day for their faith. Would you be ready to lay down your life for your theory of evolution ?
Don’t be silly. I’m a Christian. But I dare say I’d be too cowardly to lay down my life for anything voluntarily. Luckily, it’s not yet been a choice I’ve had to make.
You misrepresent me Hugh, and probably Nelka and Semper Catolicus also… I can tell the difference between factual and parable. However what is truth when you have to uphold your lofty theory above God’s truth ?
My apologies. Our discussions have not extended to the New Testament. Is there any sentence of Genesis that you do not think is literally true?
Nothing could be more of a contradiction to the Catholic faith than to believe that Adam and Eve came from the wombs of soulless animal creatures.
That’s your pre-Humani Generis interpretation of Catholicism coming out again. What do you understand by: “The Teaching Authority of the Church does not forbid that research take place with regard to the doctrine of evolution, in as far as it inquires into the origin of the human body as coming from pre-existent and living matter.”?
 
Last edited:
In that case The Catechism, commissioned by Pope John Paul II written with (name removed by moderator)ut of the bishops states that Genesis uses figurative language. Not to mention the bishops aren’t arguing that evolution contradicts Christian faith.
And finally, the pope is able to resolve disputes. Disputes aren’t going to get unamity from disputing bishops. He has authority to clarify matters of Teaching.
 
How could God hold Adam and Eve accountable for sin if they were raised by soulless animal creatures?
He’s God. His sense of Justice is beyond ours. And Adam and Eve were in a pre-Fall state. And when they chose sin, by definition, they had to know it was wrong. So the real question is why not.
 
40.png
Techno2000:
How could God hold Adam and Eve accountable for sin if they were raised by soulless animal creatures?
He’s God. His sense of Justice is beyond ours. And Adam and Eve were in a pre-Fall state. And when they chose sin, by definition, they had to know it was wrong. So the real question is why not.
Do you think Adam and Eve’s in-laws were disappointed when they got kicked out of the Garden of Eden?
 
How could God hold Adam and Eve accountable for sin if they were raised by soulless animal creatures?
Because ‘accountability for sin’ is something that only ensouled humans have. So, God could do it because He gave them souls in His image and likeness.
40.png
twf:
There is no curse of Ham in Scripture. His son Cush was cursed and there is nothing said about skin colour.
Login
Because, of course, we should take the word of private revelation over the public revelation of Scripture itself? (“When Noah woke up from his wine and learned what his youngest son had done to him, he said: ‘Cursed be Canaan! The lowest of slaves shall he be to his brothers.’” (Gen 9:25-26))
Do you think Adam and Eve’s in-laws were disappointed when they got kicked out of the Garden of Eden?
Nah… they were probably more disappointed that their kids got souls, but they did not. 😉 🤣
 
Is it possible that this decision is part of the Great Apostasy? Yes, most definitely.

No! No it isn’t! And the Great Apostasy is an idea from Jehovah’s Witnesses and Mormons. Sects that don’t even believe in the Trinity.
In answer to your question Glark. 2 Thess 2:3 Let no one deceive you in any way, for the day of the Lord will not come unless the apostasy comes first, and the man of sin is revealed, the son of perdition.
 
Is it possible that this decision is part of the Great Apostasy? Yes, most definitely.
Yes,
The truth is the truth , even if no-one believes it
and a lie is a lie, even if everyone believes it
Archbishop Fulton Sheen, still uncanonised !
 
You linked to a thread that expresses a wide range of views. Is it your view that dark skin is a curse that was gradually placed upon all Africans for the sins of their ancestors?

It’s interesting that the Acts records the supernatural evangelization of an Ethiopian and his baptism… many “blacks” were saintly Catholics at a time when Northern Europeans were barbaric pagan savages.
 
Don’t be silly. I’m a Christian. But I dare say I’d be too cowardly to lay down my life for anything voluntarily. Luckily, it’s not yet been a choice I’ve had to make.
Anyhow, here’s a couple verses of the New Testament for your consumption
Rev.21V7- He who overcomes shall posess these things and I will be his God and he shall be my son. But ,as for the cowardly and unbelieving and abominable and murderers and fornicators and sorcerers and idolaters and all liars, their portion shall be in the pool that burns with fire and brimstone, which is the second death
 
Cruel, but maybe true. I hope it doesn’t come to that. However, if I was tested, and I chickened out, I should no doubt be in crowded company in the pool that burns with fire and brimstone. You might even join me!
 
Last edited:
I don’t believe we are just judged on our last moment. It must be on what our lives have been about up until that last moment
 
Someone on this forum once quoted from her visions as alleging that Africans were cursed with dark skin, in contrast with the “nobler” races of Europe. I wanted to vomit. Pretty sure it was from the same creation account referenced by the poster you replied to.

There’s no proof they were even her visions.
Don’t the LDS believe that?
 
Very, very little of evolution science entails knowing anything factual. But it delights the pride of evo-evangelists to produce elaborate smokescreens of pseudo-scientific gibberish, in order to create grand illusions of infallible knowledge.
So basically, you find it really easy to go against the scientific consensus, both in terms of evidence and the scientific community. Isn’t that a bit prideful?
 
Last edited:
As someone else said, I ask this to other creationists on here:

What do you understand by:

“The Teaching Authority of the Church does not forbid that research take place with regard to the doctrine of evolution, in as far as it inquires into the origin of the human body as coming from pre-existent and living matter.”
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top