C
Carmel
Guest
Actually, it was ChanaanThere is no curse of Ham in Scripture. His son Cush was cursed
Actually, it was ChanaanThere is no curse of Ham in Scripture. His son Cush was cursed
Don’t be silly. I’m a Christian. But I dare say I’d be too cowardly to lay down my life for anything voluntarily. Luckily, it’s not yet been a choice I’ve had to make.Christians are dying every day for their faith. Would you be ready to lay down your life for your theory of evolution ?
My apologies. Our discussions have not extended to the New Testament. Is there any sentence of Genesis that you do not think is literally true?You misrepresent me Hugh, and probably Nelka and Semper Catolicus also… I can tell the difference between factual and parable. However what is truth when you have to uphold your lofty theory above God’s truth ?
That’s your pre-Humani Generis interpretation of Catholicism coming out again. What do you understand by: “The Teaching Authority of the Church does not forbid that research take place with regard to the doctrine of evolution, in as far as it inquires into the origin of the human body as coming from pre-existent and living matter.”?Nothing could be more of a contradiction to the Catholic faith than to believe that Adam and Eve came from the wombs of soulless animal creatures.
He’s God. His sense of Justice is beyond ours. And Adam and Eve were in a pre-Fall state. And when they chose sin, by definition, they had to know it was wrong. So the real question is why not.How could God hold Adam and Eve accountable for sin if they were raised by soulless animal creatures?
https://www.cathinfo.com/general-discussion/anne-catherine-emmerich-the-curse-of-ham/There is no curse of Ham in Scripture. His son Cush was cursed and there is nothing said about skin colour.
Do you think Adam and Eve’s in-laws were disappointed when they got kicked out of the Garden of Eden?Techno2000:![]()
He’s God. His sense of Justice is beyond ours. And Adam and Eve were in a pre-Fall state. And when they chose sin, by definition, they had to know it was wrong. So the real question is why not.How could God hold Adam and Eve accountable for sin if they were raised by soulless animal creatures?
Because ‘accountability for sin’ is something that only ensouled humans have. So, God could do it because He gave them souls in His image and likeness.How could God hold Adam and Eve accountable for sin if they were raised by soulless animal creatures?
Because, of course, we should take the word of private revelation over the public revelation of Scripture itself? (“When Noah woke up from his wine and learned what his youngest son had done to him, he said: ‘Cursed be Canaan! The lowest of slaves shall he be to his brothers.’” (Gen 9:25-26))twf:![]()
LoginThere is no curse of Ham in Scripture. His son Cush was cursed and there is nothing said about skin colour.
Nah… they were probably more disappointed that their kids got souls, but they did not.Do you think Adam and Eve’s in-laws were disappointed when they got kicked out of the Garden of Eden?
Is it possible that this decision is part of the Great Apostasy? Yes, most definitely.
No! No it isn’t! And the Great Apostasy is an idea from Jehovah’s Witnesses and Mormons. Sects that don’t even believe in the Trinity.
In answer to your question Glark. 2 Thess 2:3 Let no one deceive you in any way, for the day of the Lord will not come unless the apostasy comes first, and the man of sin is revealed, the son of perdition.Yes,Is it possible that this decision is part of the Great Apostasy? Yes, most definitely.
Anyhow, here’s a couple verses of the New Testament for your consumptionDon’t be silly. I’m a Christian. But I dare say I’d be too cowardly to lay down my life for anything voluntarily. Luckily, it’s not yet been a choice I’ve had to make.
No way. JoseYou might even join me!
Well so do I, of course, but who knows what we might fail in extremis?No way. Jose
I intend to remain on the side of the angels
Don’t the LDS believe that?Someone on this forum once quoted from her visions as alleging that Africans were cursed with dark skin, in contrast with the “nobler” races of Europe. I wanted to vomit. Pretty sure it was from the same creation account referenced by the poster you replied to.
There’s no proof they were even her visions.
So basically, you find it really easy to go against the scientific consensus, both in terms of evidence and the scientific community. Isn’t that a bit prideful?Very, very little of evolution science entails knowing anything factual. But it delights the pride of evo-evangelists to produce elaborate smokescreens of pseudo-scientific gibberish, in order to create grand illusions of infallible knowledge.