E
edwest211
Guest
Yes, I’ve read that many times. I am in awe when God does things only God can do. Like raising the dead or giving sight to the blind, instantly.
In this case, there is a direct link between science and atheism. For some, science is the justification for it. If that all fell apart tomorrow then one pillar of support for atheism would have fallen, which is why this has been discussed for years. Science does in fact claim to be the answer. Otherwise, there would be more scientists giving voice in opposition to people like Richard Dawkins and The God Delusion. But such is not the way today.
Those who claim the church does not speak about science should tell those who quote Popes to stop doing it. Why would what they say matter anyway? It matters in order to convince Catholics. To align Catholic thinking with atheist thinking. Science was always my favorite subject but in this case there is a lot of reasonable doubt. I’ve grown more skeptical because science ignores anomalies. Actual things that are alive now but went missing for millions of years. I am more skeptical of the dating methods. And as more and more complexity is found in the genome, the odds of chance events drops by an order of magnitude. This strongly suggests there was not enough time. Not enough time for even an apparently simple change.
In this case, there is a direct link between science and atheism. For some, science is the justification for it. If that all fell apart tomorrow then one pillar of support for atheism would have fallen, which is why this has been discussed for years. Science does in fact claim to be the answer. Otherwise, there would be more scientists giving voice in opposition to people like Richard Dawkins and The God Delusion. But such is not the way today.
Those who claim the church does not speak about science should tell those who quote Popes to stop doing it. Why would what they say matter anyway? It matters in order to convince Catholics. To align Catholic thinking with atheist thinking. Science was always my favorite subject but in this case there is a lot of reasonable doubt. I’ve grown more skeptical because science ignores anomalies. Actual things that are alive now but went missing for millions of years. I am more skeptical of the dating methods. And as more and more complexity is found in the genome, the odds of chance events drops by an order of magnitude. This strongly suggests there was not enough time. Not enough time for even an apparently simple change.
Last edited: